Improving robust model selection tests for dynamic models

被引:9
|
作者
Choi, Hwan-Sik [1 ]
Kiefer, Nicholas M. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Econ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[2] Cornell Univ, Dept Econ, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[3] Cornell Univ, Dept Stat Sci, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
[4] Univ Aarhus, CREATES, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
来源
ECONOMETRICS JOURNAL | 2010年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
Autocorrelation; Bootstrap; Fixed-b asymptotics; Heteroscedasticity; Model selection; NONNESTED REGRESSION-MODELS; HETEROSKEDASTICITY; BEHAVIOR; KERNEL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1368-423X.2010.00313.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
P>We propose an improved model selection test for dynamic models using a new asymptotic approximation to the sampling distribution of a new test statistic. The model selection test is applicable to dynamic models with very general selection criteria and estimation methods. Since our test statistic does not assume the exact form of a true model, the test is essentially non-parametric once competing models are estimated. For the unknown serial correlation in data, we use a Heteroscedasticity/Autocorrelation-Consistent (HAC) variance estimator, and the sampling distribution of the test statistic is approximated by the fixed-b asymptotic approximation. The asymptotic approximation depends on kernel functions and bandwidth parameters used in HAC estimators. We compare the finite sample performance of the new test with the bootstrap methods as well as with the standard normal approximations, and show that the fixed-b asymptotics and the bootstrap methods are markedly superior to the standard normal approximation for a moderate sample size for time series data. An empirical application for foreign exchange rate forecasting models is presented, and the result shows the normal approximation to the distribution of the test statistic considered appears to overstate the data's ability to distinguish between two competing models.
引用
收藏
页码:177 / 204
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Composing Efficient, Robust Tests for Policy Selection
    Morrill, Dustin
    Walsh, Thomas J.
    Hernandez, Daniel
    Wurman, Peter R.
    Stone, Peter
    UNCERTAINTY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2023, 216 : 1456 - 1466
  • [22] Robust estimation and moment selection in dynamic fixed-effects panel data models
    Cizek, P.
    Aquaro, M.
    COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS, 2018, 33 (02) : 675 - 708
  • [23] Robust estimation and moment selection in dynamic fixed-effects panel data models
    P. Čížek
    M. Aquaro
    Computational Statistics, 2018, 33 : 675 - 708
  • [24] Dynamic robust portfolio selection with copulas
    Han, Yingwei
    Li, Ping
    Xia, Yong
    FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2017, 21 : 190 - 200
  • [25] Dynamic specification tests for dynamic factor models
    Fiorentini, Gabriele
    Sentana, Enrique
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2019, 34 (03) : 325 - 346
  • [26] Robust inference in sample selection models
    Zhelonkin, Mikhail
    Genton, Marc G.
    Ronchetti, Elvezio
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 2016, 78 (04) : 805 - 827
  • [27] Robust Bayesian analysis of selection models
    Bayarri, MJ
    Berger, J
    ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1998, 26 (02): : 645 - 659
  • [28] GOODNESS-OF-FIT TESTS AND MODEL SELECTION PROCEDURES FOR DIAMETER DISTRIBUTION MODELS
    REYNOLDS, MR
    BURK, TE
    HUANG, WC
    FOREST SCIENCE, 1988, 34 (02) : 373 - 399
  • [29] Model selection and averaging of nonlinear mixed-effect models for robust phase III dose selection
    Aoki, Yasunori
    Roshammar, Daniel
    Hamren, Bengt
    Hooker, Andrew C.
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS, 2017, 44 (06) : 581 - 597
  • [30] Model selection and averaging of nonlinear mixed-effect models for robust phase III dose selection
    Yasunori Aoki
    Daniel Röshammar
    Bengt Hamrén
    Andrew C. Hooker
    Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, 2017, 44 : 581 - 597