Tumor Characteristics and Molecular Subtypes in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: The Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial

被引:31
|
作者
Johnson, Kristin [1 ]
Zackrisson, Sophia [1 ]
Rosso, Aldana [1 ]
Sartor, Hanna [1 ]
Saal, Lao H. [2 ]
Andersson, Ingvar [1 ]
Lang, Kristina [1 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Translat Med, Diagnost Radiol, Inga Marie Nilssons Gata 49, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[2] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Sci Lund, Div Oncol & Pathol, Translat Oncogen Unit, Lund, Sweden
基金
瑞典研究理事会;
关键词
MAMMOGRAPHY; GRADE; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1148/radiol.2019190132
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Screening accuracy can be improved with digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). To further evaluate DBT in screening, it is important to assess the molecular subtypes of the detected cancers. Purpose: To describe tumor characteristics, including molecular subtypes, of cancers detected at DBT compared with those detected at digital mammography (DM) in breast cancer screening. Materials and Methods: The Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial is a prospective, population-based screening trial comparing one-view DBT with two-view DM. Tumor characteristics were obtained, and invasive cancers were classified according to St Gallen as follows: luminal A-like, luminal B-like human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2-negative/HER2-positive, HER2-positive, and triple-negative cancers. Tumor characteristics were compared by mode of detection: DBT alone or DM (ie, DBT and DM or DM alone). chi(2) test was used for data analysis. Results: Between January 2010 and February 2015, 14 848 women were enrolled (mean age, 57 years +/- 10; age range, 40-76 years). In total, 139 cancers were detected; 118 cancers were invasive and 21 were ductal carcinomas in situ. Thirty-seven additional invasive cancers (36 cancers with complete subtypes and stage) were detected at DBT alone, and 81 cancers (80 cancers with complete stage) were detected at DM. No differences were seen between DBT and DM in the distribution of tumor size 20 mm or smaller (86% [31 of 36] vs 85% [68 of 80], respectively; P = .88), node-negative status (75% [27 of 36] vs 74% [59 of 80], respectively; P = .89), or luminal A-like subtype (53% [19 of 36] vs 46% [37 of 81], respectively; P = .48). Conclusion: The biologic profile of the additional cancers detected at digital breast tomosynthesis in a large prospective population-based screening trial was similar to those detected at digital mammography, and the majority were early-stage luminal A-like cancers. This indicates that digital breast tomosynthesis screening does not alter the predictive and prognostic profile of screening-detected cancers. (C) RSNA, 2019
引用
收藏
页码:273 / 281
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Role of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis in Screening and Diagnostic Breast Imaging
    Destounis, Stamatia
    SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2018, 39 (01) : 35 - 44
  • [32] MAMMA - Breast cancer screening: Mammography vs. digital breast tomosynthesis
    Graewert, Stephanie
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2024, 196 (02):
  • [33] Breast Cancer Screening Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Not All Mammography Is Equal
    Bahl, Manisha
    Lehman, Constance D.
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2019, 5 (05) : 642 - 643
  • [34] CHANGES IN BREAST CANCER SCREENING COSTS AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF DIGITAL BREAST TOMOSYNTHESIS
    Richman, Ilana B.
    Long, Jessica
    Kunst, Natalia
    Hoag, Jessica
    Xu, Xiao
    Kyanko, Kelly A.
    Aminawung, Jenerius
    Busch, Susan
    Gross, Cary
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (SUPPL 1) : S53 - S54
  • [35] Artificial Intelligence for Reducing Workload in Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Shoshan, Yoel
    Bakalo, Ran
    Gilboa-Solomon, Flora
    Ratner, Vadim
    Barkan, Ella
    Ozery-Flato, Michal
    Amit, Mika
    Khapun, Daniel
    Ambinder, Emily B.
    Oluyemi, Eniola T.
    Panigrahi, Babita
    DiCarlo, Philip A.
    Rosen-Zvi, Michal
    Mullen, Lisa A.
    RADIOLOGY, 2022, 303 (01) : 69 - 77
  • [36] Screening for Dense Breasts: Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Destounis, Stamatia V.
    Morgan, Renee
    Arieno, Andrea
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2015, 204 (02) : 261 - 264
  • [37] Outcomes by Race in Breast Cancer Screening With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Versus Digital Mammography
    Alsheik, Nila
    Blount, Linda
    Qiong, Qiu
    Talley, Melinda
    Pohlman, Scott
    Troeger, Kathleen
    Abbey, Genevieve
    Mango, Victoria L.
    Pollack, Erica
    Chong, Alice
    Donadio, Greg
    Behling, Michael
    Mortimer, Kathleen
    Conant, Emily
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 18 (07) : 906 - 918
  • [38] Racial Disparities in Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening
    Fung, Melanie
    Ray, Kimberly
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2021, 3 (04):
  • [39] Sustainable Benefits of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening
    Bae, Min Sun
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (01) : 58 - 59
  • [40] Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Controversies
    Funaro, Kimberly
    Drukteinis, Jennifer
    Falcon, Shannon
    SOUTHERN MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2017, 110 (10) : 607 - 613