Sunitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Experience from single center study, efficacy and safety

被引:7
|
作者
Patel, K. B. [1 ]
Panchal, H. P. [1 ]
Karanwal, A. B. [1 ]
Parekh, B. B. [1 ]
Shah, S. [1 ]
Prasad, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Gujarat Canc Res Inst, Dept Med & Paediat Oncol, Ahmadabad, Gujarat, India
关键词
Efficacy; metastatic renal cell carcinoma; safety; sunitinib; TYROSINE KINASE INHIBITOR; ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; ANTITUMOR-ACTIVITY; IN-VIVO; SU11248; CANCER; INTERFERON; DISEASE; GENE;
D O I
10.4103/0019-509X.180844
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The 5-year survival rate for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is estimated to be <10%. RCC is highly resistant to chemotherapy. Targeted agents are now first choice of therapy for metastatic RCC such as sunitinib and sorafenib. METHODS: This study is a retrospective analysis of 15 patients having metastatic RCC treated with sunitinib. Apart from three patients, all had clear cell histology. Thirteen patients received dosage of 50 mg/d (4 weeks on/2 weeks off cycles). In 14 patients sunitinib was used as 1st line. The primary end point was objective response rate. Secondary end points were progression free survival (PFS) and safety. RESULTS: Until date of reporting, 3 out of 15 patients are currently on sunitinib. The most common Memorial Sloan = Kettering Cancer Centre poor prognostic factor was an interval of < 1 year between diagnosis and starting of treatment (80%). The objective response rate was 13.66% (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR] = 0 + 2). Clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + stable disease) was 60% (n = 9). Median PFS in this study was 7.5 months, with a range of 2-22 month. Median overall survival (OS) of patients in this study was 12 months with a range of 3-24 month. An impact of the dose or/and number of cycles on response was seen in this study, with patients having average cycles >3 showing better response rates, PFS and OS. Major toxicities seen were fatigue (n = 7), diarrhea (n = 3) and skin rash (n = 4) with majority patients experienced Grade 1-2 toxicities. While Grade 3-4 toxicities include fatigue (n = 1), mucositis (n = 1) and nausea (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm efficacy and safety profile of sunitinib in metastatic RCC, particularly as a first line. Sunitinib produced a 60% disease control rate for metastatic RCC in Indian patients, with acceptable rates of toxicity at a dose of 50 mg daily. Response rates were well matched to other studies confirming the efficacy of sunitinib.
引用
收藏
页码:118 / +
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Sunitinib scheduling in metastatic renal cell cancer: A single-center experience.
    Picardo, Sarah Louise
    Collins, Dearbhaile
    Al Khamis, Amnah
    Mallett, Victoria Teresa
    Keegan, Niamh M.
    Ismail, Irnani
    Hennessy, Bryan
    Breathnach, Oscar S.
    Grogan, William
    Morris, Patrick G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (02)
  • [22] SUNITINIB (SU) RECHALLENGE IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA (MRCC): A SINGLE INSTITUTION EXPERIENCE
    Febbraro, Antonio
    Giordano, Guido
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (05) : 2626 - 2627
  • [23] Safety and efficacy of axitinib in pretreated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A single center experience of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria
    Vogl, Ursula Maria
    Ponhold, Lothar
    Locker, Gottfried J.
    Zielinski, Christoph
    Klingler, Christoph
    Kramer, Gero
    Schmidinger, Manuela
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2013, 31 (15)
  • [24] Sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Birmingham experience
    Ansari, Jawaher
    Fatima, Arfeen
    Fernando, Kieran
    Collins, Stuart
    James, Nicholas D.
    Porfiri, Emilio
    ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2010, 24 (02) : 507 - 510
  • [25] SUNITINIB IN METASTATIC RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: RESULTS OF A MONOCENTRIC EXPERIENCE
    Zanardi, Elisa
    Maruzzo, Marco
    Basso, Umberto
    Zustovich, Fable
    Fiduccia, Pasquale
    Brunello, Antonella
    Roma, Anna
    Farina, Patrizia
    Bezzon, Elisabetta
    Banzato, Alberto
    Zattoni, Filiberto
    Zagonel, Vittorina
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 33 (05) : 2333 - 2334
  • [26] New biomarkers of sunitinib efficacy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma
    Bolzacchini, E.
    Dentali, F.
    Tartaro, T.
    Tuzi, A.
    Proserpio, I.
    Pinotti, G.
    ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2015, 26 : 66 - 66
  • [27] A Phase II Study of Sunitinib in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: Insights into the Treatment, Efficacy and Safety
    Uemura, Hirotsugu
    Shinohara, Nobuo
    Yuasa, Takeshi
    Tomita, Yoshihiko
    Fujimoto, Hiroyuki
    Niwakawa, Masashi
    Mugiya, Soichi
    Miki, Tsuneharu
    Nonomura, Norio
    Takahashi, Masayuki
    Hasegawa, Yoshihiro
    Agata, Naoki
    Houk, Brett
    Naito, Seiji
    Akaza, Hideyuki
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 40 (03) : 194 - 202
  • [28] Safety and efficacy of nivolumab in combination with sunitinib or pazopanib in advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: the CheckMate 016 study
    Amin, Asim
    Plimack, Elizabeth R.
    Ernstoff, Marc S.
    Lewis, Lionel D.
    Bauer, Todd M.
    McDermott, David F.
    Carducci, Michael
    Kollmannsberger, Christian
    Rini, Brian I.
    Heng, Daniel Y. C.
    Knox, Jennifer
    Voss, Martin H.
    Spratlin, Jennifer
    Berghorn, Elmer
    Yang, Lingfeng
    Hammers, Hans J.
    JOURNAL FOR IMMUNOTHERAPY OF CANCER, 2018, 6
  • [29] Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of an Alternative Schedule of Sunitinib for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
    Buti, Sebastiano
    Donini, Maddalena
    Bersanelli, Melissa
    Gattara, Alessia
    Leonardi, Francesco
    Passalacqua, Rodolfo
    DRUGS IN R&D, 2017, 17 (04) : 585 - 596
  • [30] Feasibility, Safety, and Efficacy of an Alternative Schedule of Sunitinib for the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Study
    Sebastiano Buti
    Maddalena Donini
    Melissa Bersanelli
    Alessia Gattara
    Francesco Leonardi
    Rodolfo Passalacqua
    Drugs in R&D, 2017, 17 : 585 - 596