Operation mode selection of NIMBY facility Public Private Partnership projects

被引:8
|
作者
Zhao, Hui [1 ]
Zhang, Jingqi [1 ]
Ge, Yuanyuan [1 ]
机构
[1] Qingdao Univ Technol, Sch Management Engn, Qingdao, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2021年 / 16卷 / 07期
关键词
POLICY;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0254046
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Construction of not in my back yard (NIMBY) facility Public Private Partnership (PPP) projects are feasible measures to realize sustainable urbanization. In order to ensure the smooth development of the NIMBY facility PPP projects, the problem of choosing the most suitable operation mode among many PPP modes is still scarce and unscientific. In order to select the operation mode of the PPP projects that best fits the characteristics of the project, this paper constructs the operation mode selection of the NIMBY facility PPP project. Firstly, the index system of operation mode selection of the NIMBY facility PPP project is determined. G1 subjective weighting method and information entropy objective weighting method are introduced to solve the optimal weight of each index. Grey correlation theory is used to improve TOPSIS method, and the calculation form of relative proximity degree is optimized to determine the most suitable operation mode for the project. In this paper, combined weighting and TOPSIS method are applied to the research of NIMBY facility PPP project, and the operation mode selection of NIMBY facility PPP project is established, which makes up the blank of this part. Finally, a PPP project in Qingdao, Shandong Province, China, is taken as an example to verify the applicability of the model. The effectiveness of this model was tested by comparing the results of TOPSIS method, Grey target model, Extended matter-element mode and GRA-TOPSIS. It is hoped to provide useful reference for the operation mode selection of NIMBY facility PPP project.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] RISK IN PUBLIC - PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS
    Grisakova, Nora
    AKTUALNE PROBLEMY PODNIKOVEJ SFERY 2013, 2013, : 170 - 175
  • [2] Public-Private Partnership Highway Projects: Identifying Project Selection Factors
    Fathi, Medya
    Shrestha, Pramen P.
    JOURNAL OF LEGAL AFFAIRS AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION, 2023, 15 (01)
  • [3] THE EVOLUTION OF PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP PROJECTS IN ROMANIA
    Mandruleanu, Anca
    Coretchi, Dora
    BUSINESS EXCELLENCE CHALLENGES DURING THE ECONOMIC CRISIS, VOL 1, 2012, : 290 - 292
  • [4] Evaluating success of public private partnership projects
    Kusljic, Danijel
    Marenjak, Sasa
    GRADEVINAR, 2011, 63 (12): : 1079 - 1085
  • [5] Evaluation of Public Private Partnership in Infrastructure Projects
    Loganathan, Karthikeyan
    Najafi, Mohammad
    Kaushal, Vinayak
    Agyemang, Pius
    PIPELINES 2021: PLANNING, 2021, : 151 - 159
  • [6] Sustainable supplier selection for water environment treatment public-private partnership projects
    Li, Huimin
    Wang, Fuqiang
    Zhang, Chengyi
    Wang, Lunyan
    An, Xiaowei
    Dong, Guanghua
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2021, 324
  • [7] An Ordinal Game Theory Approach to the Analysis and Selection of Partners in Public–Private Partnership Projects
    Jamal Ouenniche
    Aristotelis Boukouras
    Mohammad Rajabi
    Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 2016, 169 : 314 - 343
  • [8] Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of moral hazard and adverse selection of public private partnership projects
    Owusu-Manu, De-Graft
    Kukah, Augustine Senanu Komla
    Edwards, David John
    Ameyaw, Ernest Effah
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, 2023, 23 (11) : 1805 - 1814
  • [9] Private-sector partner selection for public-private partnership projects of electric vehicle charging infrastructure
    Zhang, Lihui
    Zhao, Zhenli
    Kan, Zhinan
    ENERGY SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (05) : 1469 - 1484
  • [10] Risk Factors in IT Public-Private Partnership Projects
    Ghribi, Souhir
    Hudon, Pierre-Andre
    Mazouz, Bachir
    PUBLIC WORKS MANAGEMENT & POLICY, 2019, 24 (04) : 321 - 343