In-Bore Transrectal MRI-Guided Biopsy With Robotic Assistance in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of 57 Patients

被引:14
|
作者
Barral, Matthias [1 ]
Lefevre, Arnaud [2 ]
Camparo, Philippe [3 ]
Hoogenboom, Martijn [4 ]
Pierre, Thibaut [1 ]
Soyer, Philippe [1 ,5 ]
Cornud, Francois [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Cochin, AP HP, Dept Radiol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Clin Alma, Paris, France
[3] Ctr Pathol, Amiens, France
[4] Soteria Med, Arnhem, Netherlands
[5] Paris Descartes Univ, Paris, France
关键词
in-bore MRI guidance; prostatic cancer; robotic assistance; transrectal prostate biopsy; DATA SYSTEM; ULTRASOUND; FUSION; REGISTRATION; ACCURACY; FEASIBILITY; MANIPULATOR; VISIBILITY; STANDARD; LESIONS;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.19.21145
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to analyze the feasibility and potential role of robotic-assisted transrectal MRI-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 57 patients (mean age, 67 +/- 6 [SD] years; age range, 57-83 years; mean prostate-specific antigen level, 10.7 +/- 6.1 ng/mL) with a single prostatic lesion visible on biparametric MRI (T2-weighted and DW images) underwent robotic-assisted MRI-guided transrectal biopsy. The procedure was analyzed in terms of technical success, defined by an accurate alignment of the needle guide with the lesion; occupation time of the MRI room; number of cores; cancer detection rate (CDR); and complications. RESULTS. The biparametric MRI score was 3, 4, and 5 in 11 (19%), 30 (53%), and 16 (28%) of the 57 patients, respectively. Twenty-three lesions (23/57, 40%) originated in the peripheral zone and 34 (34/57, 60%) in the transition zone. Software-based adjustments of the robot allowed the needle guide to be aligned with the target in all lesions. The number of cores was one, two, three, and four in one (2%), 36 (63%), 18 (32%), and three (5%) patients, respectively. Obtaining more than two cores had no incremental value in determining the Gleason score or the maximum cancer core length (MCCL). The overall CDR for any cancer was 67% (38/57). It was 95% (36/38) for tumors with Gleason grade of more than 3 or MCCL greater than 3 mm and 53% (20/38) for tumors with Gleason score greater than 6. No complications were observed. The median occupation time of the MRI room was 37.8 +/- 9.7 minutes (range, 32-74 minutes). CONCLUSION. Robotic-assisted MRI-guided biopsy yields 100% technical success rate with a short MRI room occupation time and high CDRs using one or two cores.
引用
收藏
页码:W171 / W179
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical feasibility of MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsies at 0.55T
    Kaur, Tejinder
    Jiang, Yun
    Seiberlich, Nicole
    Hussain, Hero
    Wells, Shane
    Wei, John
    Caoili, Elaine
    Gulani, Vikas
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2025,
  • [32] MRI in-bore biopsy following MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy in patients with persistent suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer
    Quentin, M.
    Boschheidgen, M.
    Radtke, J. P.
    Spohn, F.
    Ullrich, T.
    Drewes, L.
    Valentin, B.
    Lakes, J.
    Al-Monajjed
    Arsov, C.
    Esposito, I
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 175
  • [33] The role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions who underwent in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy
    Mert Kilic
    Serdar Madendere
    Metin Vural
    Ersin Koseoglu
    Mevlana Derya Balbay
    Tarik Esen
    World Journal of Urology, 2023, 41 : 449 - 454
  • [34] The role of the size and number of index lesion in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS 4 lesions who underwent in-bore MRI-guided prostate biopsy
    Kilic, Mert
    Madendere, Serdar
    Vural, Metin
    Koseoglu, Ersin
    Balbay, Mevlana Derya
    Esen, Tarik
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2023, 41 (02) : 449 - 454
  • [35] Prostate cancer detection in patients with prior negative biopsy undergoing cognitive-, robotic- or in-bore MRI target biopsy
    Sascha Kaufmann
    Giorgio I. Russo
    Fabian Bamberg
    Lorenz Löwe
    Giuseppe Morgia
    Konstantin Nikolaou
    Arnulf Stenzl
    Stephan Kruck
    Jens Bedke
    World Journal of Urology, 2018, 36 : 761 - 768
  • [36] MRI-guided and robotic-assisted prostate biopsy
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2012, 22 (04) : 316 - 319
  • [37] Accuracy validation for MRI-guided robotic prostate biopsy
    Xu, Helen
    Lasso, Andras
    Vikal, Siddharth
    Guion, Peter
    Krieger, Axel
    Kaushal, Aradhana
    Whitcomb, Louis L.
    Fichtinger, Gabor
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2010: VISUALIZATION, IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, AND MODELING, 2010, 7625
  • [38] Comparison between "In-bore" MRI guided prostate biopsy and standard ultrasound guided biopsy in the patient with suspicious prostate cancer: Preliminary results
    D'Agostino, Daniele
    Bianchi, Federico Mineo
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Corsi, Paolo
    Giampaoli, Marco
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Artibani, Walter
    Porreca, Angelo
    ARCHIVIO ITALIANO DI UROLOGIA E ANDROLOGIA, 2019, 91 (02) : 87 - 92
  • [39] Prostate cancer detection in patients with prior negative biopsy undergoing cognitive-, robotic- or in-bore MRI target biopsy
    Kaufmann, Sascha
    Russo, Giorgio I.
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Loewe, Lorenz
    Morgia, Giuseppe
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Stenzl, Arnulf
    Kruck, Stephan
    Bedke, Jens
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (05) : 761 - 768
  • [40] Design of an MRI-Compatible Modularized Needle Driver for In-Bore MRI-Guided Prostate Interventions
    Kim, Ki-Young
    Li, Meng
    Gonenc, Berk
    Shang, Weijian
    Eslami, Sohrab
    Iordachita, Iulian
    2015 15TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON CONTROL, AUTOMATION AND SYSTEMS (ICCAS), 2015, : 1520 - 1525