In-Bore Transrectal MRI-Guided Biopsy With Robotic Assistance in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: An Analysis of 57 Patients

被引:14
|
作者
Barral, Matthias [1 ]
Lefevre, Arnaud [2 ]
Camparo, Philippe [3 ]
Hoogenboom, Martijn [4 ]
Pierre, Thibaut [1 ]
Soyer, Philippe [1 ,5 ]
Cornud, Francois [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Hop Cochin, AP HP, Dept Radiol, 27 Rue Faubourg St Jacques, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] Clin Alma, Paris, France
[3] Ctr Pathol, Amiens, France
[4] Soteria Med, Arnhem, Netherlands
[5] Paris Descartes Univ, Paris, France
关键词
in-bore MRI guidance; prostatic cancer; robotic assistance; transrectal prostate biopsy; DATA SYSTEM; ULTRASOUND; FUSION; REGISTRATION; ACCURACY; FEASIBILITY; MANIPULATOR; VISIBILITY; STANDARD; LESIONS;
D O I
10.2214/AJR.19.21145
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to analyze the feasibility and potential role of robotic-assisted transrectal MRI-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 57 patients (mean age, 67 +/- 6 [SD] years; age range, 57-83 years; mean prostate-specific antigen level, 10.7 +/- 6.1 ng/mL) with a single prostatic lesion visible on biparametric MRI (T2-weighted and DW images) underwent robotic-assisted MRI-guided transrectal biopsy. The procedure was analyzed in terms of technical success, defined by an accurate alignment of the needle guide with the lesion; occupation time of the MRI room; number of cores; cancer detection rate (CDR); and complications. RESULTS. The biparametric MRI score was 3, 4, and 5 in 11 (19%), 30 (53%), and 16 (28%) of the 57 patients, respectively. Twenty-three lesions (23/57, 40%) originated in the peripheral zone and 34 (34/57, 60%) in the transition zone. Software-based adjustments of the robot allowed the needle guide to be aligned with the target in all lesions. The number of cores was one, two, three, and four in one (2%), 36 (63%), 18 (32%), and three (5%) patients, respectively. Obtaining more than two cores had no incremental value in determining the Gleason score or the maximum cancer core length (MCCL). The overall CDR for any cancer was 67% (38/57). It was 95% (36/38) for tumors with Gleason grade of more than 3 or MCCL greater than 3 mm and 53% (20/38) for tumors with Gleason score greater than 6. No complications were observed. The median occupation time of the MRI room was 37.8 +/- 9.7 minutes (range, 32-74 minutes). CONCLUSION. Robotic-assisted MRI-guided biopsy yields 100% technical success rate with a short MRI room occupation time and high CDRs using one or two cores.
引用
收藏
页码:W171 / W179
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [2] "In-Bore" MRI-Guided Prostate Biopsy for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Results from 140 Consecutive Patients
    D'Agostino, Daniele
    Romagnoli, Daniele
    Giampaoli, Marco
    Bianchi, Federico Mineo
    Corsi, Paolo
    Del Rosso, Alessandro
    Schiavina, Riccardo
    Brunocilla, Eugenio
    Artibani, Walter
    Porreca, Angelo
    CURRENT UROLOGY, 2020, 14 (01) : 22 - 31
  • [3] In-bore transrectal MRI-guided prostate biopsies: Are there risk factors for complications?
    Meier-Schroers, Michael
    Homsi, Rami
    Kukuk, Guido
    Wolter, Karsten
    Decker, Georges
    Fischer, Stefan
    Marx, Christian
    Schmeel, Frederic Carsten
    Block, Wolfgang
    Sprinkart, Alois Martin
    Traeber, Frank
    Schild, Hans Heinz
    Willinek, Winfried
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 85 (12) : 2169 - 2173
  • [4] Comparison of analgesic techniques in MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsy
    Quentin, M.
    Arsov, C.
    Ullrich, T.
    Valentin, B.
    Hiester, A.
    Blondin, D.
    Albers, P.
    Antoch, G.
    Schimmoeller, L.
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (12) : 6965 - 6970
  • [5] Comparison of analgesic techniques in MRI-guided in-bore prostate biopsy
    M. Quentin
    C. Arsov
    T. Ullrich
    B. Valentin
    A. Hiester
    D. Blondin
    P. Albers
    G. Antoch
    L. Schimmöller
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 6965 - 6970
  • [6] MRI-Guided Transrectal Robotic Prostate Biopsy Validation
    Xu, H.
    Lasso, A.
    Vikal, S.
    Guion, P.
    Krieger, A.
    Kaushal, A.
    Whitcomb, L.
    Fichtinger, G.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (06) : 3128 - +
  • [7] Patients' experience with MRI-guided in-bore biopsy versus TRUS-guided biopsy in prostate cancer: a pilot study
    Pizzoli, Silvia Francesca Maria
    Marton, Giulia
    Pricolo, Paola
    Oliveri, Serena
    Summers, Paul
    Petralia, Giuseppe
    Pravettoni, Gabriella
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [8] COMPLICATION RATES FOR OUTPATIENT, TRANSRECTAL, IN-BORE MRI-GUIDED BIOPSY: SEVEN YEARS' EXPERIENCE
    Feller, John
    Greenwood, Bernadette
    May, Stuart
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2017, 197 (04): : E820 - E820
  • [9] MRI-guided in-bore biopsy of the prostate - defining the optimal number of cores needed
    Gross, Moritz
    Eisenhuber, Edith
    Assinger, Petra
    Schima, Raphael
    Susani, Martin
    Doblhammer, Stefan
    Schima, Wolfgang
    CANCER IMAGING, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [10] Open Source Platform for Transperineal In-Bore MRI-Guided Targeted Prostate Biopsy
    Herz, Christian
    Tuncali, Kemal
    Fedorov, Andriy
    MacNeil, Kyle
    Behringer, Peter A.
    Tokuda, Junichi
    Mehrtash, Alireza
    Mousavi, Parvin
    Kikinis, Ron
    Fennessy, Fiona M.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2020, 67 (02) : 565 - 576