Monopsony in the Labor Market New Empirical Results and New Public Policies

被引：0
|
作者：
Ashenfelter, Orley [1 ]
Card, David [2 ]
Farber, Henry [1 ]
Ransom, Michael R. [3 ]
机构：
[1] Princeton Univ, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[3] Brigham Young Univ, Provo, UT 84602 USA
来源：
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES | 2022年 / 57卷
关键词：
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
F [经济];
学科分类号：
02 ;
摘要：
引用
收藏
页码：S1 / S10
页数：10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] New employment relationships and the labor market
    Kosters, MH
    JOURNAL OF LABOR RESEARCH, 1997, 18 (04) : 551 - 559
  • [42] The Labor Market for New Law Professors
    George, Tracey E.
    Yoon, Albert H.
    JOURNAL OF EMPIRICAL LEGAL STUDIES, 2014, 11 (01) : 1 - 38
  • [43] New employment relationships and the labor market
    Marvin H. Kosters
    Journal of Labor Research, 1997, 18 : 551 - 559
  • [44] New Directions for Labor Market Research
    Armstrong, Charles M.
    INDUSTRIAL & LABOR RELATIONS REVIEW, 1951, 4 (03): : 413 - 414
  • [45] Labor market policy in the new economy
    Berthold, N
    Fehn, R
    ECONOMIC POLICY ISSUES OF THE NEW ECONOMY, 2002, : 105 - 136
  • [46] A new model of labor market dynamics
    Aoki, M
    Yoshikawa, H
    APPLICATION OF ECONOPHYSICS, PROCEEDINGS, 2004, : 316 - 321
  • [47] A New Labor Market for People with 'Coolabilities'
    Nordfors, David
    Grundwag, Chally
    Ferose, V. R.
    COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 2019, 62 (07) : 26 - 28
  • [48] UNDERSTANDING UNEMPLOYMENT - NEW PERSPECTIVES ON ACTIVE LABOR-MARKET POLICIES. - MCLAUGHLIN,E
    PIACHAUD, D
    JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 1994, 23 : 105 - 106
  • [49] FROM THE LABOR MARKET TO THE EMPLOYMENT MARKET: A NEW REALITY
    Karapetyan, Ruben V.
    Tarando, Elena E.
    SOTSIOLOGICHESKIE ISSLEDOVANIYA, 2023, (07): : 148 - 150
  • [50] THE INTERRELATIONS BETWEEN LABOR MARKET POLICIES AND DEMOGRAPHIC BEHAVIOR WITH SPECIAL EMPHASIS ON NEW MEMBERS OF EU
    Boboc, Cristina
    Pele, Daniel
    Titan, Emilia
    ECONOMIC WORLD DESTINY: CRISIS AND GLOBALIZATION?, SECTION I: GLOBALIZATION AND POST-GLOBALIZATION, 2010, : 111 - 119
12345