When comparing two independent groups, psychology researchers commonly use Student's t-tests. Assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance underlie this test. More often than not, when these conditions are not met, Student's t-test can be severely biased and lead to invalid statistical inferences. Moreover, we argue that the assumption of equal variances will seldom hold in psychological research, and choosing between Student's t-test and Welch's t-test based on the outcomes of a test of the equality of variances often fails to provide an appropriate answer. We show that the Welch's t-test provides a better control of Type 1 error rates when the assumption of homogeneity of variance is not met, and it loses little robustness compared to Student's t-test when the assumptions are met. We argue that Welch's t-test should be used as a default strategy.
机构:
NTNU, Reg Kunnskapssenter Barn & Unge Psykisk Helse Bar, Inst Psykisk Helse, Trondheim, NorwayNTNU, Reg Kunnskapssenter Barn & Unge Psykisk Helse Bar, Inst Psykisk Helse, Trondheim, Norway
Lydersen, Stian
Fagerland, Morten Wang
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Oslo Univ Sykehus, Seksjon Biostat & Epidemiol, Oslo Senter Biostat & Epidemiol, Oslo, NorwayNTNU, Reg Kunnskapssenter Barn & Unge Psykisk Helse Bar, Inst Psykisk Helse, Trondheim, Norway