A feedback latching controller for two-body wave energy converters under irregular wave conditions

被引:4
|
作者
Liu, Kun [1 ,2 ]
Wang, DongJiao [1 ]
Qiu, ShouQiang [1 ]
Ye, JiaWei [1 ]
Ou, JinPing [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] South China Univ Technol, Sch Civil & Transportat Engn, Guangzhou 510640, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[2] Dalian Univ Technol, State Key Lab Coastal & Offshore Engn, Dalian 116024, Peoples R China
[3] Harbin Inst Technol, Sch Civil Engn, Harbin 150090, Heilongjiang, Peoples R China
基金
中国博士后科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
wave energy converter; latching control; feedback control; average annual power; PREDICTION; CONVERSION; SYSTEM; HEAVE; SEA;
D O I
10.1007/s11431-017-9308-9
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Latching control is considered to be an effective way to improve the energy absorption of a wave energy converter (WEC). Recently, a latching control method was realized in a hydraulic power take-off (PTO) system and was demonstrated to be effective in one-body WECs. However, the effectiveness of latching control for two-body WECs still needs to be tested. In this paper, a feedback latching controller is proposed for a conceptual two-body WEC. In this conceptual design, a permanent-magnet linear generator (PMLG) is adopted as the PTO system, and a pure water hydraulic cylinder system is designed for performing the latching control. A feedback control strategy based on the measurement of latching force is established, formulated and tested numerically under realistic irregular wave conditions. The effects of the wave peak period and the PTO damping coefficient on the effectiveness of the latching control is also investigated. The results indicate that the proposed feedback latching control is effective for improving the annual power absorption of the two-body WEC. Furthermore, compared to another latching control, the proposed control is more practical because it does not require any knowledge of the wave conditions or the dynamics of the whole WEC system.
引用
收藏
页码:1114 / 1126
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] DESIGN OF A TWO-BODY WAVE ENERGY CONVERTER FEATURING CONTROLLABLE GEOMETRY
    Tom, Nathan
    Ogden, David
    Byrne, Michaela
    PROCEEDINGS OF ASME 2023 42ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON OCEAN, OFFSHORE & ARCTIC ENGINEERING, OMAE2023, VOL 8, 2023,
  • [32] Layout optimisation of the two-body heaving wave energy converter array
    Han, Meng
    Cao, Feifei
    Shi, Hongda
    Zhu, Kai
    Dong, Xiaochen
    Li, Demin
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2023, 205 : 410 - 431
  • [33] Wave Energy Converters Under Mild Wave Climates
    Martinelli, Luca
    OCEANS 2011, 2011,
  • [34] Wave Prediction and Fuzzy Logic Control of Wave Energy Converters in Irregular Waves
    Schoen, Marco P.
    Hals, Jorgen
    Moan, Torgeir
    2008 MEDITERRANEAN CONFERENCE ON CONTROL AUTOMATION, VOLS 1-4, 2008, : 413 - 418
  • [35] On improving the wave-to-wire efficiency of a two-body hinge-barge wave energy converter
    Wang, LiGuo
    Wu, ShiXuan
    Huang, TianHao
    Chen, WenChuang
    OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2023, 278
  • [36] Numerical modelling and wave tank testing of a self-reacting two-body wave energy device
    Kurniawan, Adi
    Grassow, Matthias
    Ferri, Francesco
    SHIPS AND OFFSHORE STRUCTURES, 2019, 14 (sup1) : S344 - S356
  • [37] Latching Control of Wave Energy Converters using Derivative-Free Optimization
    Feng, Zhe
    Kerrigan, Eric C.
    2013 IEEE 52ND ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON DECISION AND CONTROL (CDC), 2013, : 7474 - 7479
  • [38] Adaptive Power Control of Wave Energy Converters for Maximum Power Absorption under Irregular Sea-state Conditions
    Cantarellas, Antoni M.
    Remon, Daniel
    Koch-Ciobotaru, Cosmin
    Rodriguez, Pedro
    2015 IEEE ENERGY CONVERSION CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION (ECCE), 2015, : 6655 - 6659
  • [39] New Strategy on Power Absorption of a Concentric Two-Body Wave Energy Converter
    Natarajan, Senthil Kumar
    Cho, Ilhyoung
    ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (09)
  • [40] Modelling, control and Pontryagin Maximum Principle for a two-body wave energy device
    Candido, Jose J.
    Justino, Paulo A. P. S.
    RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (05) : 1545 - 1557