Biophysical response of young pomegranate trees to surface and sub-surface drip irrigation and deficit irrigation

被引:35
|
作者
Zhang, Huihui [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Dong [1 ]
Ayars, James E. [1 ]
Phene, Claude J. [3 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, San Joaquin Valley Agr Sci Ctr, 9611 South Riverbend Ave, Parlier, CA 93648 USA
[2] ARS, USDA, Ctr Agr Resources Res, 2150 Ctr Ave,Bldg D, Ft Collins, CO 80526 USA
[3] SDI, POB 314, Clovis, CA 93613 USA
关键词
WATER; YIELD; EVAPOTRANSPIRATION; TEMPERATURE; STRESS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.1007/s00271-017-0551-y
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Due to recurring agricultural water shortages, many farmers are looking for crops such as pomegranate that have both some degree of drought resistance and a higher economic value. To manage limited water effectively, it is necessary to know how pomegranate trees respond to varying levels of applied water and the type of irrigation system used. This study was conducted in experimental orchards located at the University of California Kearney Agricultural Research and Extension (UC KARE) Center and the USDA-ARS San Joaquin Valley Agricultural Sciences Center in Parlier, California. The impact of surface drip (DI) and subsurface drip irrigation (SDI) at the UC KARE orchard and irrigation levels (35, 50, 75, 100% of crop water use) at the USDA-ARS orchard on tree canopy size [fractional canopy ground cover (f(c)), normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), normalized difference infrared index (NDII)], canopy-to-air temperature difference, and fruit yield was determined during the 2012-2014 growing seasons. There was no difference in tree canopy size between the DI and SDI systems at the UC KARE site; but trees under SDI produced larger fruit in 2013 and higher yield whilst saving about 10% of water application. The difference in water application highlights an advantage of SDI over DI systems to conserve water without creating negative impacts on tree size or yield. At the USDA-ARS site, the 35 and 50% irrigation treatments significantly reduced tree canopy size in 2013 and 2014, compared to the 75 and 100% irrigation treatments. In 2014, trees irrigated with 75% of crop water use produced more yield than trees irrigated at 35% of crop water use. Furthermore, NDVI and NDII were correlated to f(c). The relationships between NDVI to f(c) and f(c) to pomegranate crop coefficient were established. The derived crop coefficient from ground-based remotely sensed data may potentially be used as a tool by farmers and water managers to estimate pomegranate tree water use on a field or regional scale using aerial or satellite imagery.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 435
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Estimate of wetted bulb dimensions in surface drip irrigation using response surface model
    Maia, Celsemy Eleuterio
    Aguilar Levien, Sergio Luiz
    CIENCIA RURAL, 2010, 40 (06): : 1302 - 1308
  • [32] Shifting the imbalance: Intentional reuse of Dutch sewage effluent in sub-surface irrigation
    Narain-Ford, Dominique M.
    Bartholomeus, Ruud P.
    Raterman, Bernard W.
    van Zaanen, Ian
    ter Laak, Thomas T.
    van Wezel, Annemarie P.
    Dekker, Stefan C.
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 752
  • [33] Regulated deficit irrigation and rectification of irrigation scheduling in young pear trees:: an evaluation based on vegetative and productive response
    Marsal, J
    Mata, M
    Arbonés, A
    Rufat, J
    Girona, J
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2002, 17 (02) : 111 - 122
  • [34] Experiences of deficit irrigation strategies on young orange trees: effects physiological response
    Barbagallo, S.
    Cirelli, G.
    Consoli, S.
    Parisi, R.
    Stagno, F.
    Intrigliolo, F.
    Roccuzzo, G.
    VII CONGRESO IBERICO DE AGROINGENIERIA Y CIENCIAS HORTICOLAS: INNOVAR Y PRODUCIR PARA EL FUTURO. INNOVATING AND PRODUCING FOR THE FUTURE, 2014, : 1038 - 1043
  • [35] Approach to Yield Response of Young Almond Trees to Deficit Irrigation and Biostimulant Applications
    Gutierrez-Gordillo, Saray
    Francisco Garcia-Tejero, Ivan
    Garcia-Escalera, Amelia
    Galindo, Pedro
    del Carmen Arco, Maria
    Duran Zuazo, Victor Hugo
    HORTICULTURAE, 2019, 5 (02)
  • [36] Sub-surface drip irrigation reduced N2O emissions via inhibiting denitrification pathways in northern China
    Liang, Qing
    Liu, Yang
    Zhang, Haowen
    Peng, Zhengping
    Zhang, Xin
    APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY, 2023, 191
  • [37] Water Use Efficiency of Surface Drip Irrigation versus an Alternative Subsurface Drip Irrigation Method
    Martinez, J.
    Reca, J.
    JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2014, 140 (10)
  • [38] Wet bulb dimensions in surface drip irrigation
    Maia, Celsemy Eleuterio
    Aguilar Levien, Sergio Luiz
    de Medeiros, Jose Francismar
    Dantas Neto, Jose
    REVISTA CIENCIA AGRONOMICA, 2010, 41 (01): : 149 - 158
  • [39] Yield and water productivity response of quinoa to various deficit irrigation regimes applied with surface and subsurface drip systems
    Colak, Y. Bozkurt
    Yazar, A.
    Alghory, A.
    Tekin, S.
    JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE, 2021, 159 (1-2): : 116 - 127
  • [40] PERFORMANCE OF SUGARCANE (SACCHARUM-OFFICINARUM L) UNDER SURFACE DRIP, SUB SURFACE DRIP (BIWALL) AND FURROW METHODS OF IRRIGATION
    RAMESH, P
    KAILASAM, C
    SRINIVASAN, TR
    JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY AND CROP SCIENCE-ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ACKER UND PFLANZENBAU, 1994, 172 (04): : 237 - 241