Reducing the carbon footprint of Australian milk production by mitigation of enteric methane emissions

被引:39
|
作者
Moate, Peter J. [1 ]
Deighton, Matthew H. [1 ]
Williams, S. Richard O. [1 ]
Pryce, Jennie E. [2 ]
Hayes, Ben J. [2 ]
Jacobs, Joe L. [1 ]
Eckard, Richard J. [1 ,3 ]
Hannah, Murray C. [1 ]
Wales, William J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dept Econ Dev Jobs Transport & Resources, 1301 Hazeldean Rd, Ellinbank, Vic 3821, Australia
[2] AgriBio, Dept Econ Dev Jobs Transport & Resources, 5 Ring Rd, Bundoora, Vic 3086, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Fac Vet & Agr Sci, Parkville, Vic 3010, Australia
关键词
abatement; climate change; dairy; GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; SULFUR-HEXAFLUORIDE TRACER; DRY-MATTER INTAKE; CONTROLLED-RELEASE CAPSULES; SPECIAL TOPICS-MITIGATION; NITROUS-OXIDE EMISSIONS; RESIDUAL FEED-INTAKE; GRAZING DAIRY-COWS; PERENNIAL RYEGRASS; SF6; TRACER;
D O I
10.1071/AN15222
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This review examines research aimed at reducing enteric methane emissions from the Australian dairy industry. Calorimeter measurements of 220 forage-fed cows indicate an average methane yield of 21.1 g methane (CH4)/kg dry matter intake. Adoption of this empirical methane yield, rather than the equation currently used in the Australian greenhouse gas inventory, would reduce the methane emissions attributed to the Australian dairy industry by similar to 10%. Research also indicates that dietary lipid supplements and feeding high amounts of wheat substantially reduce methane emissions. It is estimated that, in 1980, the Australian dairy industry produced similar to 185000 t of enteric methane and total enteric methane intensity was similar to 33.6 g CH4/kg milk. In 2010, the estimated production of enteric methane was 182000 t, but total enteric methane intensity had declined similar to 40% to 19.9 g CH4/kg milk. This remarkable decline in methane intensity and the resultant improvement in the carbon footprint of Australian milk production was mainly achieved by increased per-cow milk yield, brought about by the on-farm adoption of research findings related to the feeding and breeding of dairy cows. Options currently available to further reduce the carbon footprint of Australian milk production include the feeding of lipid-rich supplements such as cottonseed, brewers grains, cold-pressed canola, hominy meal and grape marc, as well as feeding of higher rates of wheat. Future technologies for further reducing methane emissions include genetic selection of cows for improved feed conversion to milk or low methane intensity, vaccines to reduce ruminal methanogens and chemical inhibitors of methanogenesis.
引用
收藏
页码:1017 / 1034
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Methane in Australian agriculture: current emissions, sources and sinks, and potential mitigation strategies
    Finn, Damien
    Dalal, Ram
    Klieve, Athol
    CROP & PASTURE SCIENCE, 2015, 66 (01): : 1 - 22
  • [32] Weak global warming mitigation by reducing black carbon emissions
    Toshihiko Takemura
    Kentaroh Suzuki
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [33] Weak global warming mitigation by reducing black carbon emissions
    Takemura, Toshihiko
    Suzuki, Kentaroh
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)
  • [34] Development and validation of a biophysical model of enteric methane emissions from Australian beef feedlots
    Muir, S. K.
    Chen, D.
    Rowell, D.
    Hill, J.
    MODELLING NUTRIENT DIGESTION AND UTILISATION IN FARM ANIMALS, 2010, : 412 - 420
  • [35] Carbon Footprint of Telemedicine Solutions - Unexplored Opportunity for Reducing Carbon Emissions in the Health Sector
    Holmner, Asa
    Ebi, Kristie L.
    Lazuardi, Lutfan
    Nilsson, Maria
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [36] SPECIAL TOPICS-Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: I. A review of enteric methane mitigation options
    Hristov, A. N.
    Oh, J.
    Firkins, J. L.
    Dijkstra, J.
    Kebreab, E.
    Waghorn, G.
    Makkar, H. P. S.
    Adesogan, A. T.
    Yang, W.
    Lee, C.
    Gerber, P. J.
    Henderson, B.
    Tricarico, J. M.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2013, 91 (11) : 5045 - 5069
  • [37] Review: Reducing enteric methane emissions improves energy metabolism in livestock: is the tenet right?
    Morgavi, D. P.
    Cantalapiedra-Hijar, G.
    Eugene, M.
    Martin, C.
    Noziere, P.
    Popova, M.
    Ortigues-Marty, I.
    Munoz-Tamayo, R.
    Ungerfeld, E. M.
    ANIMAL, 2023, 17
  • [38] Recent Advances in Enteric Methane Mitigation and the Long Road to Sustainable Ruminant Production
    Roques, Simon
    Martinez-Fernandez, Gonzalo
    Ramayo-Caldas, Yuliaxis
    Popova, Milka
    Denman, Stuart
    Meale, Sarah J.
    Morgavi, Diego P.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANIMAL BIOSCIENCES, 2024, 12 : 321 - 343
  • [39] Current state of enteric methane and the carbon footprint of beef and dairy cattle in the United States
    Dillon, Jasmine A.
    Stackhouse-Lawson, Kim R.
    Thoma, Greg J.
    Gunter, Stacey A.
    Rotz, C. Alan
    Kebreab, Ermias
    Riley, David G.
    Tedeschi, Luis O.
    Villalba, Juan
    Mitloehner, Frank
    Hristov, Alexander N.
    Archibeque, Shawn L.
    Ritten, John P.
    Mueller, Nathaniel D.
    ANIMAL FRONTIERS, 2021, 11 (04) : 57 - 68
  • [40] Current Perspectives on Achieving Pronounced Enteric Methane Mitigation From Ruminant Production
    Ungerfeld, Emilio M.
    Beauchemin, Karen A.
    Munoz, Camila
    FRONTIERS IN ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2022, 2