Diverse effects of wideband intense, non-ionizing radiation on cells and tissues

被引:0
|
作者
Beebe, S. J. [1 ]
Hall, E. H. [1 ]
Schoenbach, K. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Old Dominion Univ, Frank Reidy Res Ctr Bioelect, Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH INTERNATIONAL POWER MODULATOR SYMPOSIUM AND 2006 HIGH VOLTAGE WORKSHOPS | 2006年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Ionizing radiation can be an environmental health risk as well as a cancer therapeutic, but similar roles for non-ionizing radiation are controversial. We have examined effects of wideband, intense non-ionizing radiation applied to cells and tissues as nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs). Compared to conventional electroporation pulses, nsPEFs have shorter pulse durations (>= 10ns) and higher electric fields (similar to 300kV/cm). In spite of the high electric field, measured thermal changes are negligible. For these short pulses we have observed a number of nsPEF-induced effects on biological cells and tissues, including apoptosis induction and tumor regression at high electric fields, as well as calcium mobilization, platelet aggregation and enhanced gene transcription at lower, sublethal electric fields. When nsPEFs are below the plasma membrane (PM) charging time constant (similar to 100ns), effects on intracellular membranes are appreciable. Thus, it is possible to observe effects on intracellular structures (membranes) and functions without observing effects on the PM. For Jurkat or HL-60 cells exposed to 10ns or 60ns pulses, mobilization of calcium from intracellular stores is observed at significantly lower electric fields than electric fields needed for PM electroporation or transport. However, as the electric field and/or the pulse duration are increased, it is possible to observe effects on the PM. Thus, as the pulse duration increases there is a cell type-specific increase in effects at the PM, as well as on intracellular structures and functions. To determine nsPEF characteriastics that are responsible for these diverse cell responses, we designed experiments to determine if pulse duration, electric field, or energy density was the stimulus that recruited responses from cells to nsPEFs. The results indicate that nsPEF effects are not due to dose effects, but instead follow a scaling law (E tau) defined by the product of electric field (E) and pulse duration (tau, tau), which can be derived from circuit equations that describe membrane charging for pulses short compared to the membrane charging time constant. For both increases in ethidium homodimer fluorescence, which is used as a marker for plasma membrane electroporation and/or transport, and increases in phosphatidylserine externalization measured by Annexin-V-FITC fluorescence, which is a marker for plasma membrane lipid translocation, a threshold response to increases in both markers exhibited the same E tau value. This law also holds true for intracellular effects that are measured on isolated cells and intact tissues. Thus, the intracellular activation of caspase proteases, which are the executioners for programmed cell death by apoptosis, was independent of the energy density when pulses were applied at 10, 60 and 300ns, but directly proportional to ET. Furthermore, caspase activation in intact fibrosarcoma tumors at 300ns was directly proportional to the electric field. Finally, for apoptosis markers and nsPEF-induced cell death in HCT116 colon carcinoma cells, the E tau scaling law was extended to include pulse number (n) into the equation (E tau n). Thus, nsPEF effects are due to charging of the plasma membrane, as well as effects on intracellular structures and functions in cells and tissues that are defined by the E tau scaling law. It is anticipated that when tau significantly diminishes and charging mechanisms are not likely to predominate, the E tau scaling law will not hold and a new paradigm of ultrashort pulsed electric field effects is expected.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effects of Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation on Oxidative Stress and the Total Antioxidant Status in Humans Working in Radiation Environments
    Celik, Hakim
    Koyuncu, Ismail
    Karakilcik, Ali Ziya
    Gonel, Ataman
    Musa, Davud
    BEZMIALEM SCIENCE, 2016, 4 (03): : 106 - 109
  • [42] Redox Status in Workers Occupationally Exposed to Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Radiation
    Ahmad, Iman
    Bartenhagen, Lisa
    Michael, Kimberly
    Abdalla, Maher
    FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 180 : 58 - 58
  • [43] Mutation Effect of Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation on Drosophila melanogaster
    Yu. R. Akhmadullina
    E. V. Styazhkina
    Yu. V. Gainetdinova
    A. V. Petrova
    Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 2023, 174 : 670 - 673
  • [44] On the production of secondary ionizing particles by non-ionizing agents in cosmic radiation
    Rossi, B
    Janossy, L
    Rochester, GD
    Bound, M
    PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1940, 58 (09): : 761 - 766
  • [45] The Responsibilities of the Radiation Protection Commission (SSK) in the Non-Ionizing Radiation
    Lerchl, A.
    GESUNDHEITSWESEN, 2012, 74 (03)
  • [46] Radiation protection in non-ionizing and ionizing body composition assessment procedures
    Cornacchia, Samantha
    La Tegola, Luciana
    Maldera, Arcangela
    Pierpaoli, Elena
    Tupputi, Umberto
    Ricatti, Giovanni
    Eusebi, Laura
    Salerno, Sergio
    Guglielmi, Giuseppe
    QUANTITATIVE IMAGING IN MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2020, 10 (08) : 1723 - 1738
  • [47] ON THE PRODUCTION OF PENETRATING IONIZING PARTICLES BY THE NON-IONIZING COMPONENT OF COSMIC RADIATION
    DEVOS, PJG
    DUTOIT, SJ
    PHYSICAL REVIEW, 1946, 70 (3-4): : 229 - 230
  • [48] Occupational exposure to ionizing and non-ionizing radiation and risk of glioma - Reply
    Karipidis, Ken
    Benke, Geza
    Sim, Malcolm
    Kauppinen, Timo
    OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE-OXFORD, 2008, 58 (02): : 149 - 149
  • [49] Mutation Effect of Ionizing and Non-Ionizing Electromagnetic Radiation on Drosophila melanogaster
    Akhmadullina, Yu. R.
    Styazhkina, E. V.
    Gainetdinova, Yu. V.
    Petrova, A. V.
    BULLETIN OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2023, 174 (05) : 670 - 673
  • [50] EFFECTS OF NON-IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION ON GENE EXPRESSION IN RAT'S BRAIN
    Kumar, N.
    Sharma, V. P.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2013, 16 (03) : A109 - A110