Diverse effects of wideband intense, non-ionizing radiation on cells and tissues

被引:0
|
作者
Beebe, S. J. [1 ]
Hall, E. H. [1 ]
Schoenbach, K. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Old Dominion Univ, Frank Reidy Res Ctr Bioelect, Eastern Virginia Med Sch, Norfolk, VA 23529 USA
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 27TH INTERNATIONAL POWER MODULATOR SYMPOSIUM AND 2006 HIGH VOLTAGE WORKSHOPS | 2006年
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
Ionizing radiation can be an environmental health risk as well as a cancer therapeutic, but similar roles for non-ionizing radiation are controversial. We have examined effects of wideband, intense non-ionizing radiation applied to cells and tissues as nanosecond pulsed electric fields (nsPEFs). Compared to conventional electroporation pulses, nsPEFs have shorter pulse durations (>= 10ns) and higher electric fields (similar to 300kV/cm). In spite of the high electric field, measured thermal changes are negligible. For these short pulses we have observed a number of nsPEF-induced effects on biological cells and tissues, including apoptosis induction and tumor regression at high electric fields, as well as calcium mobilization, platelet aggregation and enhanced gene transcription at lower, sublethal electric fields. When nsPEFs are below the plasma membrane (PM) charging time constant (similar to 100ns), effects on intracellular membranes are appreciable. Thus, it is possible to observe effects on intracellular structures (membranes) and functions without observing effects on the PM. For Jurkat or HL-60 cells exposed to 10ns or 60ns pulses, mobilization of calcium from intracellular stores is observed at significantly lower electric fields than electric fields needed for PM electroporation or transport. However, as the electric field and/or the pulse duration are increased, it is possible to observe effects on the PM. Thus, as the pulse duration increases there is a cell type-specific increase in effects at the PM, as well as on intracellular structures and functions. To determine nsPEF characteriastics that are responsible for these diverse cell responses, we designed experiments to determine if pulse duration, electric field, or energy density was the stimulus that recruited responses from cells to nsPEFs. The results indicate that nsPEF effects are not due to dose effects, but instead follow a scaling law (E tau) defined by the product of electric field (E) and pulse duration (tau, tau), which can be derived from circuit equations that describe membrane charging for pulses short compared to the membrane charging time constant. For both increases in ethidium homodimer fluorescence, which is used as a marker for plasma membrane electroporation and/or transport, and increases in phosphatidylserine externalization measured by Annexin-V-FITC fluorescence, which is a marker for plasma membrane lipid translocation, a threshold response to increases in both markers exhibited the same E tau value. This law also holds true for intracellular effects that are measured on isolated cells and intact tissues. Thus, the intracellular activation of caspase proteases, which are the executioners for programmed cell death by apoptosis, was independent of the energy density when pulses were applied at 10, 60 and 300ns, but directly proportional to ET. Furthermore, caspase activation in intact fibrosarcoma tumors at 300ns was directly proportional to the electric field. Finally, for apoptosis markers and nsPEF-induced cell death in HCT116 colon carcinoma cells, the E tau scaling law was extended to include pulse number (n) into the equation (E tau n). Thus, nsPEF effects are due to charging of the plasma membrane, as well as effects on intracellular structures and functions in cells and tissues that are defined by the E tau scaling law. It is anticipated that when tau significantly diminishes and charging mechanisms are not likely to predominate, the E tau scaling law will not hold and a new paradigm of ultrashort pulsed electric field effects is expected.
引用
收藏
页码:558 / +
页数:2
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Radiation Proteomics The effects of ionizing and non-ionizing radiation on cells and tissues Preface
    Leszczynski, Dariusz
    RADIATION PROTEOMICS: THE EFFECTS OF IONIZING AND NON-IONIZING RADIATION ON CELLS AND TISSUES, 2013, 990 : V - VI
  • [2] Towards bridging non-ionizing, ultra intense, laser radiation and ionizing radiation in cancer therapy
    Serafetinides, Alexandros
    Makropoulou, Mersini
    20TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE AND SCHOOL ON QUANTUM ELECTRONICS: LASER PHYSICS AND APPLICATIONS, 2019, 11047
  • [3] Detector for non-ionizing radiation
    Giurma, I.
    Telisca, M.
    Antohi, C.
    Giurma, C.-R.
    Management of Technological Changes, Book 1, 2005, : 255 - 260
  • [4] NON-IONIZING RADIATION DETECTION
    Navas, Gustavo
    Tarazona, Jairo
    Correa, Rodrigo
    DYNA-COLOMBIA, 2009, 76 (160): : 71 - 81
  • [5] WORKSHOP ON NON-IONIZING RADIATION
    REPACHOLI, MH
    HEALTH PHYSICS, 1983, 44 (06): : 711 - 711
  • [6] ADVERSE CUTANEOUS EFFECTS OF IONIZING AND NON-IONIZING ELECTROMAGNETIC-RADIATION
    TESTA, ER
    COOPER, JS
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGIC SURGERY AND ONCOLOGY, 1980, 6 (03): : 210 - 213
  • [7] Effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation on the eye lens
    Dovrat, A
    Berenson, R
    Bormusov, E
    Lahav, A
    Lustman, T
    Sharon, N
    Schachter, L
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2004, 45 : U177 - U177
  • [8] Abscopal and immune-effects with non-ionizing radiation
    Szasz, O.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2016, 192 : 102 - 102
  • [9] Radiobiological effects and medical applications of non-ionizing radiation
    Omer, Hiba
    SAUDI JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2021, 28 (10) : 5585 - 5592
  • [10] EXPOSURE LIMITS FOR NON-IONIZING RADIATION
    不详
    LANCET, 1983, 1 (8320): : 371 - 371