Exploring facilitators and barriers to medication error reporting among healthcare professionals in Qatar using the theoretical domains framework: A mixed-methods approach

被引:23
|
作者
Stewart, Derek [1 ]
Thomas, Binny [1 ,2 ]
MacLure, Katie [1 ]
Wilbur, Kerry [3 ]
Wilby, Kyle [3 ]
Pallivalapila, Abdulrouf [2 ]
Dijkstra, Andrea [4 ]
Ryan, Cristin [5 ]
El Kassem, Wessam [2 ]
Awaisu, Ahmed [3 ]
McLay, James S. [6 ]
Singh, Rajvir [4 ]
Al Hail, Moza [2 ]
机构
[1] Robert Gordon Univ, Sch Pharm & Life Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
[2] Hamad Med Corp, Womens Hosp, Doha, Qatar
[3] Qatar Univ, Coll Pharm, Doha, Qatar
[4] Hamad Med Corp, Doha, Qatar
[5] Royal Coll Surgeons Ireland, Sch Pharm, Dublin, Ireland
[6] Univ Aberdeen, Inst Med Sci, Aberdeen, Scotland
来源
PLOS ONE | 2018年 / 13卷 / 10期
关键词
ATTITUDES;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0204987
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background There is a need for theory informed interventions to optimise medication reporting. This study aimed to quantify and explain behavioural determinants relating to error reporting of healthcare professionals in Qatar as a basis of developing interventions to optimise the effectiveness and efficiency of error reporting. Methods A sequential explanatory mixed methods design comprising a cross-sectional survey followed by focus groups in Hamad Medical Corporation, Qatar. All doctors, nurses and pharmacists were invited to complete a questionnaire that included items of behavioural determinants derived from the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF), an integrative framework of 33 theories of behaviour change. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify components, with total component scores computed. Differences in total scores among demographic groupings were tested using Mann-Whitney U test (2 groups) or Kruskal-Wallis (>2 groups). Respondents expressing interest in focus group participation were sampled purposively, and discussions based on survey findings using the TDF to provide further insight to survey findings. Ethical approval was received from Hamad Medical Corporation, Robert Gordon University, and Qatar University. Results One thousand, six hundred and four questionnaires were received (67.9% nurses, 13.3% doctors, 12.9% pharmacists). Questionnaire items clustered into six components of: knowledge and skills related to error reporting; feedback and support; action and impact; motivation; effort; and emotions. There were statistically significant higher scores in relation to age (older more positive, p<0.001), experience as a healthcare professional (more experienced most positive apart from those with the highest level of experience, p<0.001), and profession (pharmacists most positive, p<0.05). Fifty-four healthcare professionals from different disciplines participated in the focus groups. Themes mapped to nine of fourteen TDF domains. In terms of emotions, the themes that emerged as barriers to error reporting were: fear and worry on submitting a report; that submitting was likely to lead to further investigation that could impact performance evaluation and career progression; concerns over the impact on working relationships; and the potential lack of confidentiality. Conclusions This study has quantified and explained key facilitators and barriers of medication error reporting. Barriers appeared to be largely centred on issues relating to emotions and related beliefs of consequences. Quantitative results demonstrated that while these were issues for all healthcare professionals, those younger and less experienced were most concerned. Qualitative findings highlighted particular concerns relating to these emotional aspects. These results can be used to develop theoretically informed interventions with the aims of improving the effectiveness and efficiency of the medication reporting systems impacting patient safety.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pharmacists' perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study
    Yeung, Kingston W. C. M.
    Lee, Samantha K. M.
    Bin, Yu Sun
    Cheung, Janet M. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACY, 2023, 45 (05) : 1153 - 1166
  • [42] Barriers and facilitators to healthcare professional behaviour change in clinical trials using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a case study of a trial of individualized temperature-reduced haemodialysis
    Justin Presseau
    Brittany Mutsaers
    Ahmed A. Al-Jaishi
    Janet Squires
    Christopher W. McIntyre
    Amit X. Garg
    Manish M. Sood
    Jeremy M. Grimshaw
    Trials, 18
  • [43] Evaluating barriers and facilitators to healthcare providers' use of an emergency department electronic referral portal for high-risk children with asthma using the Theoretical Domains Framework
    Shukla, Meghna
    Carcone, April
    Mooney, Michael
    Kannikeswaran, Nirupama
    Ellis, Deborah A.
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 2024, 61 (03) : 184 - 193
  • [44] Barriers and enablers to the management of osteoarthritis in primary care in Ireland from the perspective of healthcare professionals and individuals with osteoarthritis: a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework
    Cunningham, Joice
    Doyle, Frank
    Cadogan, Cathal
    Clyne, Barbara
    Ryan, Jennifer
    Smith, Susan M.
    French, Helen P.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [45] Barriers and facilitators to healthcare professional behaviour change in clinical trials using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a case study of a trial of individualized temperature-reduced haemodialysis
    Presseau, Justin
    Mutsaers, Brittany
    Al-Jaishi, Ahmed A.
    Squires, Janet
    McIntyre, Christopher W.
    Garg, Amit X.
    Sood, Manish M.
    Grimshaw, Jeremy M.
    TRIALS, 2017, 18
  • [46] Pharmacists’ perspectives and attitudes towards the 2021 down-scheduling of melatonin in Australia using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a mixed-methods study
    Kingston W. C. M. Yeung
    Samantha K. M. Lee
    Yu Sun Bin
    Janet M. Y. Cheung
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2023, 45 : 1153 - 1166
  • [47] Job motivation and associated factors among healthcare professionals serving in primary hospitals in the Central Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia: a mixed-methods approach
    Legesse, Mandefro Tadesse
    Abuhay, Habtamu Wagnew
    Worku, Nigusu
    Dellie, Endalkachew
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2025, 13
  • [48] Factors influencing patient safety competence among Chinese vocational nursing students: A mixed-methods study using COM-B model and theoretical domains framework
    Zhou, Lu
    Sun, Yinsong
    Xiao, Mingzhao
    Yang, Runli
    Zheng, Shuang
    Shen, Jun
    Zhao, Qinghua
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING STUDIES ADVANCES, 2025, 8
  • [49] Barriers to childhood cataract services across India. A mixed methods study using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) of behaviour change
    Sethu, Sheeladevi
    Lawrenson, John
    Fielder, Alistair R.
    Kekunnaya, Ramesh
    Ali, Rahul
    Borah, Rishi R.
    Suttle, Catherine M.
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2017, 58 (08)
  • [50] Personal Genomes in Practice: Exploring Citizen and Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Personalized Genomic Medicine and Personal Health Data Spaces Using a Mixed-Methods Design
    Tommel, Judith
    Kenis, Daan
    Lambrechts, Nathalie
    Brohet, Richard M.
    Swysen, Jordy
    Mollen, Lotte
    Hoefmans, Marie-Jose F.
    Pusparum, Murih
    Evers, Andrea W. M.
    Ertaylan, Goekhan
    Roos, Marco
    Hens, Kristien
    Houwink, Elisa J. F.
    GENES, 2023, 14 (04)