The chlamydia screening studies: rationale and design

被引:40
|
作者
Low, N
McCarthy, A
Macleod, J
Salisbury, C
Horner, PJ
Roberts, TE
Campbell, R
Herring, A
Skidmore, S
Sanford, E
Sterne, JAC
Smith, GD
Graham, A
Huengsberg, M
Ross, J
Egger, M
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Social Med, Bristol BS8 2PR, Avon, England
[2] Univ Birmingham, Dept Primary Care, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol BS6 6JL, Avon, England
[4] United Bristol Healthcare Trust, Milne Ctr, Bristol BS2 8HW, Avon, England
[5] Publ Hlth Lab Serv, Bristol Lab, Bristol BS2 8EL, Avon, England
[6] Publ Hlth Lab Serv, Birmingham Lab, Birmingham B9 5ST, W Midlands, England
[7] Univ Birmingham, Hlth Serv Management Ctr, Birmingham B15 2RT, W Midlands, England
[8] Heart Birmingham Primary Care Trust, Whittall St Clin, Birmingham B4 6DH, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1136/sti.2003.006197
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Background: Screening has been recommended to reduce the prevalence and morbidity associated with genital chlamydia infection in the United Kingdom. Methods: We describe the rationale and study design of the Chlamydia Screening Studies (ClaSS), a collaborative project designed to evaluate screening outside genitourinary medicine clinics. A nonselective, active screening approach in 16-39 year olds randomly sampled from 27 general practice lists in the Bristol and Birmingham areas formed the basis of interlinked studies: a case-control study was used to investigate factors to improve the targeting of screening; participants with chlamydia were invited to enrol in a randomised controlled trial to evaluate partner notification conducted in primary care; and laboratory based studies were used to assess the best specimens and tests. We also explored psychosocial effects of screening and partner notification and modelled the cost effectiveness of the programme. Conclusion: Results from four pilot practices show that mailing of specimens for chlamydia testing is feasible but that it is difficult to achieve high response rates with postal screening. The high prevalence of asymptomatic infection in men suggests that efforts to screen men for chlamydia should be strengthened.
引用
收藏
页码:342 / 348
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Design of future intervention studies for Chlamydia pneumoniae in atherosclerosis
    Grayston, JT
    AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1999, 138 (05) : S556 - S557
  • [22] Chlamydia screening - National chlamydia screening programme in England: making progress
    Fenton, KA
    Ward, H
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2004, 80 (05) : 331 - 333
  • [23] SCREENING FOR CHLAMYDIA Opportunistic or population register based programmes for chlamydia screening?
    Bone, Angie
    Soldan, Kate
    Woodhall, Sarah
    Clarke, Janette
    Gill, O. Noel
    BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 345
  • [24] Chlamyweb Study I: rationale, design and acceptability of an internet-based chlamydia testing intervention
    Lydie, Nathalie
    de Barbeyrac, Bertille
    Bluzat, Lucile
    Le Roy, Chloe
    Kersaudy-Rahib, Delphine
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2017, 93 (03) : 179 - 187
  • [25] Evaluation of a New Website Design for Iwantthekit for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Trichomonas Screening
    Kuder, Margaret
    Goheen, Mary Jett
    Dize, Laura
    Barnes, Mathilda
    Gaydos, Charlotte A.
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES, 2015, 42 (05) : 243 - 245
  • [26] Pitfalls of chlamydia screening
    Hocking, J. S.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 : 367 - 368
  • [27] Screening op Chlamydia?
    不详
    Huisarts en Wetenschap, 2001, 44 (4) : 617 - 617
  • [28] The future of chlamydia screening
    Tobin, JM
    Harindra, V
    Tucker, LJ
    SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS, 2000, 76 (04) : 233 - 234
  • [29] Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis
    Andersen, Berit
    Olesen, Frede
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
  • [30] Screening for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea
    Marrazzo, Jeanne
    Dionne-Odom, Jodie
    JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2021, 326 (10): : 913 - 915