In vitro embryotoxicity assessment with dental restorative materials

被引:101
|
作者
Schwengberg, S
Bohlen, H
Kleinsasser, N
Kehe, K
Seiss, M
Walther, UI
Hickel, R
Reichl, FX
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Walther Straub Inst Pharmakol & Toxikol, D-80336 Munich, Germany
[2] Axiogenesis AG, D-50931 Cologne, Germany
[3] Univ Regensburg, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, D-8400 Regensburg, Germany
[4] Sanitatsakad Bunderswehr, Inst Pharmacol & Toxicol, D-80937 Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Munich, Dept Operat Restorat Dent Periodontol & Pedodont, D-80336 Munich, Germany
关键词
dental materials; embryotoxicity; teratogenesis; mouse embryonic stem cells;
D O I
10.1016/j.jdent.2004.08.001
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives. Resin (co)monomers; may be released from restorative dental materials and can diffuse into the tooth pulp or the gingiva, and can reach the saliva and the circulating blood. Genotoxic potential of some dental composite components has been clearly documented. The genotoxic effects of xenobiotics can represent a possible step in tumor initiation and/or embryotoxicity/teratogenesis. A modified fluorescent mouse embryonic stem cell test (R.E.Tox((R))) was used to test the embryotoxic potential of following dental restorative materials: Bisphenol A glycidylmethacrylate (BisGMA), urethanedimethacrylate (UDMA), hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA), and triethyleneglycoldimethacrylate (TEGDMA), as wet( as some of their metabolic intermediates 2,3-epoxy-2-methyl-propionicacid-methylester (EMPME), methacrylic acid (MA), and 2,3-epoxy-2-methylpropionic acid (EMPA). Methods. Mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells stably transfected with a vector containing the gene for the green fluorescent protein under control of the cardiac alpha-myosin heavy chain promoter were differentiated in the presence of various concentrations of the test compounds for 12 days. Fluorescence was measured using the TECAN Safire((R)) and values were expressed as percent of control values. To distinguish between cytotoxic and embryotoxic effects, all compounds were tested in a standard MTT assay. Results. HEMA, TEGDMA and EMPME did not influence the differentiation process of ES cells towards cardiac myocytes. No cytotoxic effects were observed at any of the concentration levels tested. Exposure to BisGMA resulted in a 50% decrease in cell Embryotoxic effects were also present at 10(-6) and 10(-7) M (p < 0.05). EMPA induced a decrease in ES cell differentiation at 10(-5) M (p < 0.01) without cytotoxic effects. No embryotoxic effects were induced at tower concentrations. Exposure to UDMA resulted in a slight decrease of cell differentiation at 10(-5) M (p < 0.05). Exposure of cells to MA resulted in an increase of cardiac differentiation up to 150% (p < 0.05) at 10(-5) M without cytotoxic effects. Conclusions. BisGMA induced a significant high embryotoxic/teratogenic effect over a large range of concentration. Therefore attention should be focused on this dental monomer, which should be investigated further by in vivo experiments. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 55
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of histamine release and immunomodulation induced by restorative dental materials
    Babakhin, AA
    Volozhin, AI
    Kazarina, LN
    Guschina, OO
    Babakhina, JA
    DuBuske, LM
    JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 2006, 117 (02) : S205 - S205
  • [22] Development of technique for in vitro embryotoxicity of dental biomaterials
    Imai, Koichi
    JAPANESE DENTAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2016, 52 (03) : 54 - 62
  • [23] IN-VITRO LIBERATION OF FLUORIDE FROM VARIOUS DENTAL RESTORATIVE MATERIALS
    LEGRAND, M
    DECARLIN.C
    CIMASONI, G
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1973, 52 (03) : 589 - 589
  • [24] Mechanical properties of modern restorative "bioactive" dental materials - an in vitro study
    Radwanski, Mateusz
    Zmyslowska-Polakowska, Ewa
    Osica, Karolina
    Krasowski, Michal
    Sauro, Salvatore
    Hardan, Louis
    Lukomska-Szymanska, Monika
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2025, 15 (01):
  • [25] In-vitro-cytotoxicity of self-adhesive dental restorative materials
    Ohlsson, Ella
    Bolay, Carola
    Arabulan, Sevgi
    Galler, Kerstin M.
    Buchalla, Wolfgang
    Schmalz, Gottfried
    Widbiller, Matthias
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2024, 40 (04) : 739 - 746
  • [26] In vitro dentin barrier cytotoxicity testing of some dental restorative materials
    Jiang, R. D.
    Lin, H.
    Zheng, G.
    Zhang, X. M.
    Du, Q.
    Yang, M.
    JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2017, 58 : 28 - 33
  • [27] Evaluation of wear behavior of dental restorative materials against zirconia in vitro
    Maier, Eva
    Grottschreiber, Christine
    Knepper, Ines
    Opdam, Niek
    Petschelt, Anselm
    Loomans, Bas
    Lohbauer, Ulrich
    DENTAL MATERIALS, 2022, 38 (05) : 778 - 788
  • [28] Methacrylates in dental restorative materials
    Henriks-Eckerman, ML
    Suuronen, K
    Jolanki, R
    Alanko, K
    CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2004, 50 (04) : 233 - 237
  • [29] RESTORATIVE DENTAL MATERIALS - FOREWORD
    WORNER, HK
    METALS FORUM, 1980, 3 (04): : 198 - 199
  • [30] Tribology in restorative dental materials
    Fukui, Hisao
    JOURNAL OF JAPANESE SOCIETY OF TRIBOLOGISTS, 2006, 51 (10) : 695 - 700