Electron scattering loss in Earth's inner magnetosphere - 2. Sensitivity to model parameters

被引:117
|
作者
Abel, B [1 ]
Thorne, RM
机构
[1] Olympic Coll, Dept Appl Phys, Bremerton, WA 98810 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Atmospher Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
来源
关键词
D O I
10.1029/97JA02920
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
The sensitivity of the rate of energetic electron pitch angle scattering and precipitation loss in the Earth's magnetosphere due to Coulomb interactions with thermal plasma and resonant wave-particle interactions with plasmaspheric hiss, lightning-generated whistlers and VLF transmitter signals is computed for a realistic range of plasma and wave parameters. The computed scattering rates are most sensitive to the choice of mean wave frequency and the average angle of propagation; the frequency bandwidth and angular spread in propagation direction are relatively unimportant. Variations in plasma density can also strongly modulate the effectiveness of wave-particle interactions. The average intensity of plasma waves controls electron lifetimes, but has little effect on the shape of the equilibrium pitch angle distribution function. All three classes of waves must be included together with Coulomb collisions in any realistic analysis of inner magnetospheric electron scattering. The long-term energetic electron population beyond the inner belt is largely controlled by plasmaspheric hiss and, to a lesser extent, by lightning-generated whistlers, while VLF transmitter signals constitute the principal loss mechanism over the range 1.3 less than or equal to L less than or equal to 2.4. The region below L = 1.3 is dominated by Coulomb collisions.
引用
收藏
页码:2397 / 2407
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Observational features of charge distribution in Earth's inner magnetosphere
    Gao, Lai
    Shen, Chao
    Zhou, Yufei
    Ji, Yong
    Pu, Zuyin
    Parks, George
    Russell, Christopher T.
    Zeng, Gang
    Ma, Lan
    Torbert, Roy B.
    Yang, Yanyan
    Burch, James L.
    COMMUNICATIONS PHYSICS, 2024, 7 (01)
  • [22] Chapman Conference on the Earth's radiation belts and the inner magnetosphere
    Baker, Daniel N.
    Summers, Danny
    Mann, Ian R.
    SPACE WEATHER-THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2011, 9
  • [23] Modeling the Dynamics of Energetic Protons in Earth's Inner Magnetosphere
    Lyu, Xingzhi
    Tu, Weichao
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2022, 127 (03)
  • [24] Observational features of charge distribution in Earth’s inner magnetosphere
    Lai Gao
    Chao Shen
    Yufei Zhou
    Yong Ji
    Zuyin Pu
    George Parks
    Christopher T. Russell
    Gang Zeng
    Lan Ma
    Roy B. Torbert
    Yanyan Yang
    James L. Burch
    Communications Physics, 7
  • [25] Modeling of Plasma Density in the Earth's Dayside Inner Magnetosphere
    V. V. Domrachev
    D. V. Chugunin
    Cosmic Research, 2002, 40 : 411 - 417
  • [26] How the Earth's inner magnetosphere works: An evolving picture
    Wolf, R. A.
    Spiro, R. W.
    Sazykin, S.
    Toffoletto, F. R.
    JOURNAL OF ATMOSPHERIC AND SOLAR-TERRESTRIAL PHYSICS, 2007, 69 (03) : 288 - 302
  • [27] Modeling of plasma density in the earth's dayside inner magnetosphere
    Domrachev, VV
    Chugunin, DV
    COSMIC RESEARCH, 2002, 40 (04) : 411 - 417
  • [28] Formation process of relativistic electron flux through interaction with chorus emissions in the Earth's inner magnetosphere
    Omura, Yoshiharu
    Miyashita, Yu
    Yoshikawa, Masato
    Summers, Danny
    Hikishima, Mitsuru
    Ebihara, Yusuke
    Kubota, Yuko
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2015, 120 (11) : 9545 - 9562
  • [29] The envelope soliton for the nonlinear interaction of Langmuir waves with electron acoustic waves in the Earth's inner magnetosphere
    Liu, Yong
    Zhou, Jiang
    PHYSICS OF PLASMAS, 2022, 29 (09)
  • [30] Empirical model of proton fluxes in the equatorial inner magnetosphere: 2. Properties and applications
    Milillo, A
    Orsini, S
    Delcourt, DC
    Mura, A
    Massetti, S
    De Angelis, E
    Ebihara, Y
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2003, 108 (A5)