High-power short-duration ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation protocol using a single catheter

被引:11
|
作者
Badertscher, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Knecht, Sven [1 ,2 ]
Spies, Florian [1 ,2 ]
Vollmin, Gian [1 ,2 ]
Schaer, Beat [1 ,2 ]
Scharli, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
Bosshard, Flurina [1 ,2 ]
Osswald, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Sticherling, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Kuhne, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Cardiol, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Basel, Cardiovasc Res Inst Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Efficacy; PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; CRYOBALLOON; FEASIBILITY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-022-01226-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly performed electrophysiological procedure. To improve healthcare utilization, we aimed to compare the efficacy, efficiency, and safety of a minimalistic, streamlined single catheter ablation approach using a high-power short-duration ablation index-guided protocol (HPSD) vs. a control single-catheter protocol (SP). Methods Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a single transseptal puncture without a multipolar mapping catheter was performed in 91 patients. Left atrial mapping was performed with the ablation catheter, only. Pacing maneuvers were used to confirm exit block. Procedural characteristics and success rates were compared using HPSD (n = 34) vs. a control (n = 57) ablation protocol. Freedom from recurrence was defined as a 1-year absence of AF episodes > 30 s, beyond the 3-month blanking period. Results Using the HPSD protocol the median procedure and RF ablation time were significantly shorter compared to the SP, 84 (IQR 76-100) vs. 118 min (IQR 104-141) and 1036 (898-1184) vs. 1949s (IQR 1693-2261), respectively, p < .001 for all. First-pass PVI was achieved using the HPSD protocol in 88% and using the SP in 87% of patients, p = 1.0. No procedural complications were observed. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels were significantly higher in patients using the HPSD protocol compared to the SP. At 12 months follow-up, 87% patients remained free from AF with no differences between groups. Conclusions A minimalistic, HPSD ablation index-guided PVI with a single-catheter approach is very efficient, safe, and associated with excellent clinical outcomes at 1 year.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 642
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Actual tissue temperature during ablation index-guided high-power short-duration ablation versus standard ablation: Implications in terms of the efficacy and safety of atrial fibrillation ablation
    Otsuka, Naoto
    Okumura, Yasuo
    Kuorkawa, Sayaka
    Nagashima, Koichi
    Wakamatsu, Yuji
    Hayashida, Satoshi
    Ohkubo, Kimie
    Nakai, Toshiko
    Hao, Hiroyuki
    Takahashi, Rie
    Taniguchi, Yoshiki
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2022, 33 (01) : 55 - 63
  • [32] Impact of combining ablation index-guided and very high-power short-duration ablation at posterior wall adjacent to esophagus during perioperative period on procedural factors
    Yano, Masamichi
    Egami, Yasuyuki
    Abe, Masaru
    Osuga, Mizuki
    Nohara, Hiroaki
    Kawanami, Shodai
    Ukita, Kohei
    Kawamura, Akito
    Yasumoto, Koji
    Okamoto, Naotaka
    Matsunaga-Lee, Yasuharu
    Nishino, Masami
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2025, 36 (01) : 85 - 94
  • [33] Durable pulmonary vein isolation with optimized high-power and very high-power short-duration temperature-controlled ablation: A step-by-step guide
    De Potter, Tom J. R.
    De Becker, Benjamin
    Duytschaever, Mattias
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (05) : 886 - 894
  • [34] The use of a high-power (50 W), ablation index-guided protocol for ablation of the cavotricuspid isthmus
    Tscholl, Verena
    Kamieniarz, Paul
    Nagel, Patrick
    Landmesser, Ulf
    Attanasio, Philipp
    Huemer, Martin
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2020, 36 (06) : 1045 - 1050
  • [35] Procedural characteristics of pulmonary vein isolation with high-power short-duration setting compared to conventional setting
    Hijioka, Naoko
    Kaneshiro, Takashi
    Nehashi, Takeshi
    Amami, Kazuaki
    Nodera, Minoru
    Yamada, Shinya
    Kamioka, Masashi
    Ishida, Takafumi
    Takeishi, Yasuchika
    BMC CARDIOVASCULAR DISORDERS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [36] High-power short duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: simply cranking up the energy?
    Deneke, Thomas
    Halbfass, Philipp
    Puererfellner, Helmut
    EUROPACE, 2020, 22 (03): : 335 - 337
  • [37] High-power, short-duration ablation during Box isolation for atrial fibrillation
    Kumagai, Koichiro
    Toyama, Hideko
    JOURNAL OF ARRHYTHMIA, 2020, 36 (05) : 899 - 904
  • [38] Procedural characteristics of pulmonary vein isolation with high-power short-duration setting compared to conventional setting
    Naoko Hijioka
    Takashi Kaneshiro
    Takeshi Nehashi
    Kazuaki Amami
    Minoru Nodera
    Shinya Yamada
    Masashi Kamioka
    Takafumi Ishida
    Yasuchika Takeishi
    BMC Cardiovascular Disorders, 22
  • [39] Pulmonary vein isolation durability after very high-power short-duration ablation utilizing a very-close protocol - The FAST AND FURIOUS redo study
    Heeger, Christian-H.
    Subin, Behnam
    Eitel, Charlotte
    Popescu, Sorin Stefan
    Phan, Huong-Lan
    Mamaev, Roman
    Bartoli, Lorenzo
    Grosse, Niels
    Reincke, Samuel
    Traub, Anna
    Lopez, Delgado
    Kirstein, Bettina
    Hatahet, Sascha
    Kuck, Karl-Heinz
    Vogler, Julia
    Tilz, Roland R.
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2024, 50
  • [40] High-power short-duration versus low-power long-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation: A substudy of the AWARE randomized controlled trial
    Joza, Jacqueline
    Nair, Girish M.
    Birnie, David H.
    Nery, Pablo B.
    Redpath, Calum J.
    Sarrazin, Jean-Francois
    Champagne, Jean
    Bernick, Jordan
    Wells, George A.
    Essebag, Vidal
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (01) : 136 - 145