High-power short-duration ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation protocol using a single catheter

被引:11
|
作者
Badertscher, Patrick [1 ,2 ]
Knecht, Sven [1 ,2 ]
Spies, Florian [1 ,2 ]
Vollmin, Gian [1 ,2 ]
Schaer, Beat [1 ,2 ]
Scharli, Nicolas [1 ,2 ]
Bosshard, Flurina [1 ,2 ]
Osswald, Stefan [1 ,2 ]
Sticherling, Christian [1 ,2 ]
Kuhne, Michael [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Basel, Dept Cardiol, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Basel, Cardiovasc Res Inst Basel, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Efficacy; PAROXYSMAL ATRIAL-FIBRILLATION; CRYOBALLOON; FEASIBILITY; LESIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s10840-022-01226-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly performed electrophysiological procedure. To improve healthcare utilization, we aimed to compare the efficacy, efficiency, and safety of a minimalistic, streamlined single catheter ablation approach using a high-power short-duration ablation index-guided protocol (HPSD) vs. a control single-catheter protocol (SP). Methods Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a single transseptal puncture without a multipolar mapping catheter was performed in 91 patients. Left atrial mapping was performed with the ablation catheter, only. Pacing maneuvers were used to confirm exit block. Procedural characteristics and success rates were compared using HPSD (n = 34) vs. a control (n = 57) ablation protocol. Freedom from recurrence was defined as a 1-year absence of AF episodes > 30 s, beyond the 3-month blanking period. Results Using the HPSD protocol the median procedure and RF ablation time were significantly shorter compared to the SP, 84 (IQR 76-100) vs. 118 min (IQR 104-141) and 1036 (898-1184) vs. 1949s (IQR 1693-2261), respectively, p < .001 for all. First-pass PVI was achieved using the HPSD protocol in 88% and using the SP in 87% of patients, p = 1.0. No procedural complications were observed. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin levels were significantly higher in patients using the HPSD protocol compared to the SP. At 12 months follow-up, 87% patients remained free from AF with no differences between groups. Conclusions A minimalistic, HPSD ablation index-guided PVI with a single-catheter approach is very efficient, safe, and associated with excellent clinical outcomes at 1 year.
引用
收藏
页码:633 / 642
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] High-power short-duration ablation index–guided pulmonary vein isolation protocol using a single catheter
    Patrick Badertscher
    Sven Knecht
    Florian Spies
    Gian Völlmin
    Beat Schaer
    Nicolas Schärli
    Flurina Bosshard
    Stefan Osswald
    Christian Sticherling
    Michael Kühne
    Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2022, 65 : 633 - 642
  • [2] Lower contact force predicts right pulmonary vein carina breakthrough after ablation index-guided pulmonary vein isolation using high-power short-duration
    Chen, Wei-Tso
    Chung, Fa-Po
    Lin, Yenn-Jiang
    Chang, Shih-Lin
    Lo, Li-Wei
    Hu, Yu-Feng
    Tuan, Ta-Chuan
    Chao, Tze-Fan
    Liao, Jo-Nan
    Lin, Chin-Yu
    Chang, Ting-Yung
    Kuo, Ling
    Wu, Cheng-, I
    Liu, Chih-Min
    Liu, Shin-Huei
    Hsieh, Yu-Cheng
    Li, Cheng-Hung
    Chen, Shih-Ann
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2024, 35 (01) : 60 - 68
  • [3] Update on high-power short-duration ablation for pulmonary vein isolation
    Qiu, Jie
    Wang, Yan
    Wang, Dao W.
    Hu, Mei
    Chen, Guangzhi
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2020, 31 (09) : 2499 - 2508
  • [4] High-Power Short-Duration Lesion Index-Guided Posterior Wall Isolation beyond Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
    Conti, Sergio
    Sabatino, Francesco
    Fortunato, Fabrizio
    Ferrara, Giuliano
    Cascino, Antonio
    Sgarito, Giuseppe
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (16)
  • [5] High-Power Short-Duration Lesion Index-Guided Posterior Wall Isolation on Top of Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation
    Conti, Sergio
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2023, 34 (04) : 1056 - 1057
  • [6] High-power short-duration ablation: The new standard for pulmonary vein isolation?
    Chaldoupi, Sevasti-Maria
    Luermans, Justin
    Vernooy, Kevin
    Linz, Dominik
    IJC HEART & VASCULATURE, 2021, 36
  • [7] High-Power and Short-Duration Ablation for Pulmonary Vein Isolation Biophysical Characterization
    Leshem, Eran
    Zilberman, Israel
    Tschabrunn, Cory M.
    Barkagan, Michael
    Contreras-Valdes, Fernando M.
    Govari, Assaf
    Anter, Elad
    JACC-CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2018, 4 (04) : 467 - 479
  • [8] Biophysical parameters of pulmonary vein isolation with very high-power short-duration compared to conventional radiofrequency ablation guided by ablation index
    Duarte, F. Fabiana
    Silva-Teixeira, R.
    Almeida, J. Goncalves
    Fonseca, P.
    Oliveira, M.
    Goncalves, H.
    Primo, J.
    Fontes-Carvalho, R.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2024, 26 : 6 - 6
  • [9] Effectiveness of first-pass pulmonary vein isolation with index-guided ablation compared to very-high-power, short-duration ablation: A retrospective single-center study
    Peller, Michal
    Dzwinacka, Julia
    Krzowski, Bartosz
    Marchel, Michal
    Maciejewski, Cezary
    Mitrzak, Karolina
    Opolski, Grzegorz
    Grabowski, Marcin
    Balsam, Pawel
    Lodzinski, Piotr
    POLISH HEART JOURNAL-KARDIOLOGIA POLSKA, 2025, 83 (01): : 35 - 42
  • [10] Procedural efficacy and safety of standardized, ablation index guided fixed 50 W high-power short-duration pulmonary vein isolation and substrate modification using the CLOSE protocol
    Francke, Alexander
    Taha, Nadja S.
    Scharfe, Frank
    Schoen, Steffen
    Wunderlich, Carsten
    Christoph, Marian
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2021, 32 (09) : 2408 - 2417