Use of Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:15
|
作者
Kim, Tae-Hun [1 ,2 ]
Kang, Jung Won [3 ]
Jeon, Sae-Rom [2 ]
Ang, Lin [4 ,5 ]
Lee, Hye Won [6 ]
Lee, Myeong Soo [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Korean Med Hosp, Korean Med Clin Trial Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Kyung Hee Univ, Grad Sch, Dept ofClin Korean Med, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Kyung Hee Univ, Coll Korean Med, Dept Acupuncture & Moxibust, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Korea Inst Oriental Med, KM Sci Res Div, Daejeon, South Korea
[5] Univ Sci & Technol, Korean Convergence Med, Daejeon, South Korea
[6] Korea Inst Oriental Med, KM Convergence Res Div, Daejeon, South Korea
关键词
prevalence of usage; complementary and alternative medicine; systematic review; meta-analysis; STROBE statement; Traditional Complementary and Integrative Medicine; TCIM; DISEASE; 2019; COVID-19; CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ASSOCIATION; KNOWLEDGE; PROVINCE; CARE;
D O I
10.3389/fmed.2022.884573
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Traditional, Complementary and Integrative Medicine (TCIM) has been reported to use for symptom management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The objective of this review was to identify the overall usage prevalence of TCIM interventions for COVID-19. Methods: Surveys on the general population and observational studies on the COVID-19 patient chart review were located in the search of PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases in September 2021. Observational studies, such as cross-sectional studies, surveys, cohort studies and hospital-based patient case reviews, published in any language, reporting the usage of TCIM in the patients with COVID-19 or the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic were included in this review. Data screening and extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The reporting quality of the included studies was assessed with the STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. To conduct a meta-analysis of the usage prevalence of various TCIM interventions, the effect size of the proportion for each intervention was calculated with the inverse variance method. The main outcome was usage prevalence of TCIM interventions among patients with COVID-19 or the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results: A total of 62 studies were included in this review. The overall TCIM usage prevalence was estimated to be 0.64 (95% CI 0.54-0.73). The overall prevalence did not differ between the population-based survey (0.65, 95% CI 0.48-0.81) and the hospital-based patient case review (0.63, 95% CI 0.52-0.73). Statistical heterogeneity and comparatively low quality in reporting were observed, which should be cautiously considered when interpreting the results. Conclusion: Various TCIM interventions were reported to be used with comparatively high frequency. Future international collaborative research might overcome the main limitation of this study, i.e., the heterogeneity of the included data.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Changes in appendicitis treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic - A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Koehler, Franziska
    Mueller, Sophie
    Hendricks, Anne
    Kastner, Carolin
    Reese, Lena
    Boerner, Kevin
    Flemming, Sven
    Lock, Johan F.
    Germer, Christoph-Thomas
    Wiegering, Armin
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 95
  • [32] Global Excess Mortality during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Shang, Weijing
    Wang, Yaping
    Yuan, Jie
    Guo, Zirui
    Liu, Jue
    Liu, Min
    VACCINES, 2022, 10 (10)
  • [33] Acute Cholecystitis Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic - A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shahramian, Iraj
    Parooie, Fateme
    Salarzaei, Morteza
    POLISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2020, 94 (04) : 6 - 14
  • [34] Effects of different Chinese traditional exercises on mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Shiqing
    Liu, Min
    Zhao, Lijin
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 12
  • [35] A public survey of traditional, complementary and integrative medicine use during the COVID-19 outbreak in Hong Kong
    Lam, Chun Sing
    Koon, Ho Kee
    Chung, Vincent Chi-Ho
    Cheung, Yin Ting
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (07):
  • [36] Thyroxine changes in COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Ziqi
    Hou, Pengwei
    Mu, Shuwen
    Wang, Renzhi
    Miao, Hui
    Feng, Ming
    Wang, He
    Zhang, Wentai
    Chen, Yihao
    Feng, Tianshun
    Wang, Shousen
    Fang, Yi
    FRONTIERS IN ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2023, 14
  • [37] Digital Media Use and Adolescents' Mental Health During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Marciano, Laura
    Ostroumova, Michelle
    Schulz, Peter Johannes
    Camerini, Anne-Linda
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 9
  • [38] Psychotropic use for behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yoon, Jung Min
    Kim, Eunjin
    Trinkoff, Alison M.
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [39] Traditional, complementary and integrative medicine for fatigue post COVID-19 infection: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Xiao-ying
    Lu, Chun-li
    Wang, Qian-yun
    Pan, Xing-ru
    Zhang, Yang-yang
    Wang, Jia-le
    Liao, Jun-Ya
    Hu, Nai-chong
    Wang, Chen-yang
    Duan, Bing-jie
    Liu, Xue-han
    Jin, Xin-yan
    Hunter, Jennifer
    Liu, Jian-ping
    INTEGRATIVE MEDICINE RESEARCH, 2024, 13 (02)
  • [40] Problematic Gaming during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression
    Imperato, Chiara
    Giardina, Alessandro
    Manari, Tommaso
    Albano, Antonio
    Franceschini, Christian
    Schimmenti, Adriano
    Musetti, Alessandro
    HEALTHCARE, 2023, 11 (24)