Comparative study of the sensing performance of orthogonal fluxgate sensors with different amorphous sensing elements

被引:15
|
作者
Zhao, Z. J.
Li, X. P.
Fan, J.
Seet, H. L.
Qian, X. B.
Ripka, P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Czech Tech Univ, Fac Elect Engn, CR-16635 Prague, Czech Republic
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Mech Engn, Singapore 117548, Singapore
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Div Bioengn, Singapore 117548, Singapore
关键词
magnetic sensors; giant magneto-impedance effect; high sensitivity;
D O I
10.1016/j.sna.2006.10.054
中图分类号
TM [电工技术]; TN [电子技术、通信技术];
学科分类号
0808 ; 0809 ;
摘要
A comparative study of the sensing performance of orthogonal fluxgate sensors using different amorphous wires as sensing elements is presented. The sensing elements used are Co-based amorphous wire with and without glass-coating. The results show that the sensor with amorphous wire sensing element made by cold draw is more sensitive when the excitation ac passing through the wire is of low frequency, and the sensor with glass-coated wire is more sensitive when the excitation ac is of high frequency. The results are explained by considering the magnetic properties of the wires, such as the magnetic softness of the wires, indicated by the hysteresis loops, as well as by the magneto-impedance (MI) effect ratios that tell the ac magnetic properties of the wires under the influence of "skin effect". The M1 spectrum results show that the Ml ratio of the cold-draw amorphous wire is larger at low frequency and smaller at high frequency, compared to that of the glass-coated wire, which reveals that the circumferential permeability plays a key role in the sensor sensitivity and the skin effect is related to the frequency characteristics. (C) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:90 / 94
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sensing elements of optical sensors based on polystyrene with covalently immobilized reagents
    Kuznetsov, V. V.
    Sheremet'ev, S. V.
    JOURNAL OF ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 62 (03) : 270 - 278
  • [42] Structural Properties and Sensing Performance of CeYxOy Sensing Films for Electrolyte–Insulator–Semiconductor pH Sensors
    Tung-Ming Pan
    Chih-Wei Wang
    Ching-Yi Chen
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [43] Comparative Study of Different Methods for Soot Sensing and Filter Monitoring in Diesel Exhausts
    Feulner, Markus
    Hagen, Gunter
    Hottner, Kathrin
    Redel, Sabrina
    Mueller, Andreas
    Moos, Ralf
    SENSORS, 2017, 17 (02)
  • [44] Optimizing the sensing performance of a single-rod fluxgate magnetometer using thin magnetic wires
    Can, Hava
    Svec, Peter, Jr.
    Tanriseven, Sercan
    Bydzovsky, Jan
    Birlikseven, Cengiz
    Sozeri, Huseyin
    Svec, Peter, Sr.
    Topal, Ugur
    MEASUREMENT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 26 (11)
  • [45] Comparative study of the giant stress impedance behavior of commercial amorphous ribbons for strain sensing applications
    Pan, Patrick
    Hayward, T. J.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSICS, 2022, 131 (21)
  • [46] Compressed Sensing for Different Sensors: A Real Scenario for WSN and IoT
    Amarlingam, M.
    Mishra, Pradeep Kumar
    Prasad, K. V. V. Durga
    Rajalakshmi, P.
    2016 IEEE 3RD WORLD FORUM ON INTERNET OF THINGS (WF-IOT), 2016, : 289 - 294
  • [47] Progress of Different Sensing Materials Modified QCM Gas Sensors
    Wang Zhenqiang
    Yang Mingqing
    He Junhui
    Yang Qinowen
    PROGRESS IN CHEMISTRY, 2015, 27 (2-3) : 251 - 266
  • [48] Comparative performance analysis of mixed metal oxide sensors for dual-sensing leveraging machine learning
    Binowesley, R.
    Savarimuthu, Kirubaveni
    Emimal, M.
    NANOTECHNOLOGY, 2025, 36 (09)
  • [49] Comparative study on sensing abilities of polyaniline and graphene polyaniline composite sensors toward methylamine and ammonia
    Farooqi, Bilal Ahmad
    Ashraf, Ayesha
    Farooq, Umar
    Ayub, Khurshid
    POLYMERS FOR ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, 2020, 31 (12) : 3351 - 3360
  • [50] Performance analysis and experiment study of redundant orthogonal six-dimensional force sensing mechanism
    Yao J.
    Ruan H.
    Cai D.
    Shan J.
    Zhao Y.
    Yi Qi Yi Biao Xue Bao/Chinese Journal of Scientific Instrument, 2020, 41 (01): : 162 - 169