Bile in the esophagus: A factor in the pathogenesis of reflux esophagitis in children

被引:16
|
作者
Orel, R
Markovic, T
机构
关键词
gastroesophageal reflux disease; reflux esophagitis; children; bile reflux; duodenogastroesophageal reflux;
D O I
10.1097/00005176-200302000-00020
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Bile reflux has been postulated to be an important factor contributing to gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults. The purpose of this study was to investigate its role in children. Methods: Sixty-five children with symptoms of gastroesophaeal reflux disease were classified on the basis of the endoscopic grade of reflux esophagitis: no esophagitis (n = 26) mild to moderate esophagitis (n = 26), and severe esophagitis (n = 13). Simultaneous 24-hour esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring with Bilitec 2000 was performed. Results: Both bile and acid reflux increased with the severity of esophagitis. The differences between all groups were significant for the percentage of total (P < 0.0005), Upright (P < 0.05), and supine time (P < 0.0005) bilirubin absorbance 0.14, as well as for the percentage of total and supine time pH < 4, and DeMeester score (P < 0.0005). Combined pathologic acid and bile reflux was found in 11% of children with mild esophagitis and in 70% of children with severe esophagitis, while isolated bile reflux was found in 31% and 7.5%, respectively. Combined pH and bilirubin monitoring, compared with ph-monitoring alone, increased the sensitivity from 56% to 79%, and the accuracy from 69% to 83%. Conclusions: Both bile and acid reflux increase stepwise with the severity of esophagitis. Combined acid and bile reflux is associated with severe esophagitis. Isolated acid or bile reflux is usually present in mild esophagitis. Simultaneous esophageal pH and bilirubin monitoring has a higher sensitivity, as well as predictive values and accuracy than ph monitoring alone. JPGN 36:266-273, 2003. Key Words: Gastroesophageal reflux disease-Reflux esophagitis-Children-Bile reflux-Duodeno,,astroesophageal reflux. (C) 2003 Lippincott Williams Wilkins, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:266 / 273
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] DYNAMIC SCINTIGRAPHY OF THE ESOPHAGUS IN THE EVALUATION OF REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS
    BABIC, Z
    UGARKOVIC, B
    IVANCEVIC, D
    BABIC, D
    NUKLEARMEDIZIN-NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 1990, 29 (05): : 204 - 209
  • [22] BARRETTS ESOPHAGUS IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS
    MANN, NS
    TSAI, MF
    NAIR, PK
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1989, 84 (12): : 1494 - 1496
  • [23] SYMPTOMATIC REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS AND BARRETT-ESOPHAGUS
    MANN, NS
    TSAI, MF
    NAIR, FK
    CLINICAL RESEARCH, 1987, 35 (03): : A415 - A415
  • [24] Importance of bile reflux to the esophagus in reflux esophagitis and the meaning of establishing a new endoscopy EP-0002 system to visualize bilirubin
    Sugimoto, Mitsushige
    Murata, Masaki
    Kawai, Takashi
    DIGESTIVE ENDOSCOPY, 2024, 36 (08) : 915 - 917
  • [25] Increased acid and bile reflux in patients with Barrett's esophagus compared with reflux esophagitis - Response to acid suppressant therapy.
    Menges, M
    Mueller, M
    Zeitz, M
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 118 (04) : A226 - A226
  • [26] Timing of bile and acid reflux into the esophagus
    Netzer, P
    Inauen, W
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 97 (01): : 207 - 207
  • [27] BILE REFLUX IN BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS
    IFTIKHAR, SY
    EVANS, DF
    STEELE, RJC
    LEDINGHAM, S
    ATKINSON, M
    HARDCASTLE, JD
    GUT, 1991, 32 (05) : A554 - A554
  • [28] BILE-SALTS IN THE ESOPHAGUS OF PATIENTS WITH ESOPHAGITIS
    JOHNSSON, F
    JOELSSON, B
    FLOREN, CH
    NILSSON, A
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1988, 23 (06) : 712 - 716
  • [29] DUODENOGASTRIC REFLUX (DGR) IN BARRETTS-ESOPHAGUS (BE) AND REFLUX ESOPHAGITIS (RE)
    JOHNSON, DA
    DRANE, WE
    KARVELIS, KC
    WINTERS, C
    SILVERMAN, ED
    CATTAU, EL
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1986, 90 (05) : 1793 - 1793
  • [30] Pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux and Barrett esophagus
    Buttar, NS
    Falk, GW
    MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 76 (02) : 226 - 234