Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy

被引:32
|
作者
Vachon-Marceau, Chantale [1 ]
Demers, Suzanne [1 ,2 ]
Bujold, Emmanuel [1 ,2 ]
Roberge, Stephanie [2 ]
Gauthier, Robert J. [3 ]
Pasquier, Jean-Charles [4 ]
Girard, Mario [2 ]
Chaillet, Nils [1 ,2 ]
Boulvain, Michel [5 ]
Jastrow, Nicole [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[2] Univ Laval, CHU Quebec, Ctr Rech, Quebec City, PQ, Canada
[3] Univ Montreal, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Univ Sherbrooke, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Geneva, Hop Univ Geneve, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
cesarean; pregnancy; surgical technique; ultrasound; uterine scar; INTERDELIVERY INTERVAL; VAGINAL BIRTH; RUPTURE; RISK; DELIVERY; SECTION; TRIAL; LABOR; INCISION; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.042
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: Uterine rupture is a potential life-threatening complication during a trial of labor after cesarean delivery. Single-layer closure of the uterus at cesarean delivery has been associated with an increased risk of uterine rupture compared with double-layer closure. Lower uterine segment thickness measurement by ultrasound has been used to evaluate the quality of the uterine scar after cesarean delivery and is associated with the risk of uterine rupture. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the impact of previous uterine closure on lower uterine segment thickness. STUDY DESIGN: Women with a previous single low-transverse cesarean delivery were recruited at 34-38 weeks' gestation. Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasound evaluation of the lower uterine segment thickness was performed by a sonographer blinded to clinical data. Previous operative reports were reviewed to obtain the type of previous uterine closure. Third-trimester lower uterine segment thickness at the next pregnancy was compared according to the number of layers sutured and according to the type of thread for uterine closure, using weighted mean differences and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Of 1613 women recruited, with operative reports available, 495 (31%) had a single-layer and 1118 (69%) had a double-layer closure. The mean third-trimester lower uterine segment thickness was 3.3 +/- 1.3 mm and the proportion with lower uterine segment thickness <2.0 mm was 10.5%. Double-layer closure of the uterus was associated with a thicker lower uterine segment than single-layer closure (weighted mean difference: 0.11 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02 to 0.21 mm). In multivariate logistic regression analyses, a double-layer closure also was associated with a reduced risk of lower uterine segment thickness <2.0 mm (odd ratio [OR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.90). Compared with synthetic thread, the use of catgut for uterine closure had no significant impact on third-trimester lower uterine segment thickness (WMD: -0.10 mm; 95% CI, -0.22 to 0.02 mm) or on the risk of lower uterine segment thickness <2.0 mm (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.67 to 1.33). Finally, double-layer closure was associated with a reduced risk of uterine scar defect (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.61) at birth. CONCLUSION: Compared with single-layer closure, a double-layer closure of the uterus at previous cesarean delivery is associated with a thicker third-trimester lower uterine segment and a reduced risk of lower uterine segment thickness <2.0 mm in the next pregnancy. The type of thread for uterine closure has no significant impact on lower uterine segment thickness.
引用
收藏
页码:65.e1 / 65.e5
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Sonographic evaluation of the wall thickness of the lower uterine segment in patients with previous cesarean section
    Tanik, A
    Ustun, C
    Cil, E
    Arslan, A
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1996, 24 (07) : 355 - 357
  • [42] Sonographic assessment of lower uterine segment thickness at term in women with previous cesarean delivery
    Uharcek, Peter
    Brestansky, Alexander
    Ravinger, Jozef
    Manova, Andrea
    Zajacova, Maria
    ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2015, 292 (03) : 609 - 612
  • [43] Relationship between Ultrasonographic Lower Uterine Segment Thickness and Uterine Scar Defect in Pregnant Women with Previous Cesarean Section
    Ayan, Fatma Turkan
    Cakmak, Bullent
    KONURALP TIP DERGISI, 2015, 7 (02): : 103 - 107
  • [44] Labour Before a Caesarean Section and the Morphology of the Lower Uterine Segment in the Next Pregnancy
    Boutin, Amelie
    Berube, Laurie
    Girard, Mario
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2011, 33 (02) : 105 - 105
  • [45] The risk of uterine rupture is not increased with single- compared with double-layer closure: a Swedish cohort study
    Hesselman, S.
    Hogberg, U.
    Ekholm-Selling, K.
    Rassjo, E-B
    Jonsson, M.
    BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2015, 122 (11) : 1535 - 1541
  • [46] Impact of adding a second layer to a single unlocked closure of a Cesarean uterine incision: randomized controlled trial
    Bennich, G.
    Rudnicki, M.
    Wilken-Jensen, C.
    Lousen, T.
    Lassen, P. D.
    Wojdemann, K.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 47 (04) : 417 - 422
  • [47] A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Single vs. Double Layer Closure of Hysterotomy at the Time of Cesarean Delivery: The Effect on Uterine Scar Thickness
    Bamberg, Christian
    Dudenhausen, Joachim W.
    Bujak, Verena
    Rodekamp, Elke
    Brauer, Martin
    Hinkson, Larry
    Kalache, Karim
    Henrich, Wolfgang
    ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2018, 39 (03): : 343 - 351
  • [48] Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial
    Roberge, Stephanie
    Demers, Suzanne
    Girard, Mario
    Vikhareva, Olga
    Markey, Stephanie
    Chaillet, Nils
    Moore, Lynne
    Paris, Gaetan
    Bujold, Emmanuel
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (04) : 507.e1 - 507.e6
  • [49] Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial
    Ahn, Jun-Woo
    Lee, Soo-Jeong
    Kwon, Yong-Soon
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 216 (01) : 81 - 82
  • [50] Sonographic Assessment of the Lower Uterine Segment (LUS) Thickness and Integrity in Patients with Previous Cesarean Delivery
    Mutlaq, Jamal Mohammad
    Hamad, Hesham Mohamad
    BAHRAIN MEDICAL BULLETIN, 2021, 43 (01) : 357 - 360