Capital assets underpinning economic well-being - The example of whale ecosystem services in Arctic coastal communities

被引:9
|
作者
Cook, David [1 ]
Malinauskaite, Laura [2 ]
Daviosdottir, Brynhildur [3 ]
Ogmundardottir, Helga [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iceland, Sch Engn & Nat Sci, Environm & Nat Resources, Gimli, Saemundargotu 2, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Univ Iceland, Fac Life & Environm Sci, Environm & Nat Resources, Gimli, Saemundargotu 2, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[3] Univ Iceland, Fac Econ, Fac Life & Environm Sci, Environm & Nat Resources, Saemundargotu 2, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
[4] Univ Iceland, Fac Social & Human Sci, Gimli, Saemundargotu 2, IS-102 Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
Capital assets; Well-being; Ecosystem services; Whales; Resilience; Sustainability; CLIMATE-CHANGE; COPRODUCTION; SUSTAINABILITY; RESILIENCE; CASCADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101432
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Arctic coastal communities are a part of co-evolving marine social-ecological systems (SES), which support livelihoods, provide sustenance and underpin cultural identity. Whale ecosystem services (ES) represent a useful lens for gaining greater understanding of the linkages between marine ecosystems and human well-being, in the Arctic and beyond. The increasingly popular well-being economy paradigm recognises the contribution of different capital assets to human well-being and how these underpin the pursuit of sustainability domains: environmental, social and economic. This study explores the ways in which capital assets (natural, social, human, and financial and physical) provide essential natural and non-natural inputs into the delivery of whale ES in Arctic coastal communities. Through the deployment of a well-being economy framework linking capital assets to well-being goals and domains, examples are reported from three Arctic coastal communities in Iceland, Norway and Greenland. These case studies are based on data collected using multiple qualitative research methods: stakeholder mapping, participant and non-participant observations, literature reviews, and 54 semi structured interviews with various stakeholders. The findings affirm that non-natural capital assets interact with natural capital in order to supply various whale ES, which include but are not limited to provisioned food products, recreational tourism, education, and artistic expressions. These results are significant since they provide a basis for understanding when, where and how decision-makers should intervene in whale ES delivery to maximise well-being and sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Scientific research on ecosystem services and human well-being: A bibliometric analysis
    Wang, Bojie
    Zhang, Qin
    Cui, Fengqi
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2021, 125
  • [42] Insights into the importance of ecosystem services to human well-being in reservoir landscapes
    Jones, Sarah K.
    Boundaog, Mansour
    DeClerck, Fabrice A.
    Estrada-Carmona, Natalia
    Mirumachi, Naho
    Mulligan, Mark
    ECOSYSTEM SERVICES, 2019, 39
  • [43] A bibliographic review of the relationship between ecosystem services and human well-being
    Zhou, Yuchen
    Huang, Qingxu
    He, Chunyang
    Chen, Peiyuan
    Yin, Dan
    Zhou, Yihan
    Bai, Yansong
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024,
  • [44] Reflections on the ecosystem services of whales and valuing their contribution to human well-being
    Cook, David
    Malinauskaite, Laura
    Davidsdottir, Brynhildur
    Ogmundardottir, Helga
    Roman, Joe
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 186 (186)
  • [45] Subjective Well-Being and Social Capital in Belgian Communities. The Impact of Community Characteristics on Subjective Well-Being Indicators in Belgium
    Hooghe, Marc
    Vanhoutte, Bram
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2011, 100 (01) : 17 - 36
  • [46] Subjective Well-Being and Social Capital in Belgian Communities. The Impact of Community Characteristics on Subjective Well-Being Indicators in Belgium
    Marc Hooghe
    Bram Vanhoutte
    Social Indicators Research, 2011, 100 : 17 - 36
  • [47] Intangible Capital: Its Contribution to Economic Growth, Well-being and Rationality
    Yang, Benhua
    REVIEW OF SOCIAL ECONOMY, 2011, 69 (01) : 134 - 137
  • [48] Intangible Capital: Its Contribution to Economic Growth, Well-Being and Rationality
    Robbins, Carol
    EASTERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2012, 38 (02) : 279 - 281
  • [49] Parallel Subjective Well-Being and Choice Experiment Evaluation of Ecosystem Services: Marine and Forest Reserves in Coastal Oregon, USA
    Lindberg, Kreg
    Swearingen, Tommy
    White, Eric M.
    SOCIAL INDICATORS RESEARCH, 2020, 149 (01) : 347 - 374
  • [50] The structure of human well-being related to ecosystem services in coastal areas: A comparison among the six North Pacific countries
    Hori, Juri
    Makino, Mitsutaku
    MARINE POLICY, 2018, 95 : 221 - 226