The Distress Thermometer for screening for severe fatigue in newly diagnosed breast and colorectal cancer patients

被引:14
|
作者
Abrahams, H. J. G. [1 ]
Gielissen, M. F. M. [2 ]
de Lugt, M. [3 ]
Kleijer, E. F. W. [4 ]
de Roos, W. K. [5 ]
Balk, E. [6 ]
Verhagen, C. A. H. H. V. M. [7 ]
Knoop, H. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Expert Ctr Chron Fatigue, POB 9101,916, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Med Psychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Hosp Gelderse Vallei, Dept Med Psychol, Ede, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Educ & Training, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Hosp Gelderse Vallei, Dept Surg, Ede, Netherlands
[6] Hosp Gelderse Vallei, Dept Med Oncol, Ede, Netherlands
[7] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Dept Med Oncol, Med Ctr, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; EMOTION REGULATION; POSITIVE EMOTIONS; MINDFULNESS; DEPRESSION; QUESTIONNAIRE; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; SYMPTOMS; RECOVERY;
D O I
10.1002/pon.4208
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective Internationally, the Distress Thermometer and associated Problem List are increasingly used in oncology as screening tools for psychological distress. Cancer-related fatigue is common but often overlooked in clinical practice. We examined if severe fatigue in cancer patients can be identified with the fatigue item of the Problem List. Methods Newly diagnosed breast (N = 334) and colorectal (N = 179) cancer patients were screened for severe fatigue, which was defined as having a positive score on the fatigue item of the Problem List. The Fatigue Severity subscale of the Checklist Individual Strength was used as gold standard measure for severe fatigue. Results In total, 78% of breast cancer patients and 81% of colorectal cancer patients were correctly identified with the fatigue item. The sensitivity was 89% in breast cancer patients and 91% in colorectal cancer patients. The specificity was 75% in breast cancer patients and 77% in colorectal cancer patients. The positive predictive value was 53% in breast cancer patients and 64% in colorectal cancer patients, whereas the negative predictive value was 95% in both tumor types. Conclusions The fatigue item of the Problem List performs satisfactorily as a quick screening tool for severe fatigue. However, a positive screen should be followed up with a more thorough assessment of fatigue, ie, a questionnaire with a validated cutoff point. Given time pressure of clinicians, this already implemented and brief screening tool may prevent severe fatigue from going undetected in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 697
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Swedish Version of the Distress Thermometer: Validity Evidence in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    Sarenmalm, Elisabeth Kenne
    Nasic, Salmir
    Hakanson, Cecilia
    Ohlen, Joakim
    Carlsson, Eva
    Pettersson, Monica E.
    Sawatzky, Richard
    JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2018, 16 (08): : 959 - 966
  • [42] Higher risk of colorectal cancer in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus before the age of colorectal cancer screening initiation
    Sander de Kort
    Ad A. M. Masclee
    Silvia Sanduleanu
    Matty P. Weijenberg
    Myrthe P. P. van Herk-Sukel
    Nico J. J. Oldenhof
    Joop P. W. van den Bergh
    Harm R. Haak
    Maryska L. Janssen-Heijnen
    Scientific Reports, 7
  • [43] Higher risk of colorectal cancer in patients with newly diagnosed diabetes mellitus before the age of colorectal cancer screening initiation
    de Kort, Sander
    Masclee, Ad A. M.
    Sanduleanu, Silvia
    Weijenberg, Matty P.
    van Herk-Sukel, Myrthe P. P.
    Oldenhof, Nico J. J.
    van den Bergh, Joop P. W.
    Haak, Harm R.
    Janssen-Heijnen, Maryska L.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [44] Measuring Distress in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Olmstead, Allie
    Wexelman, Barbara
    Fellner, Angela
    Hubbard, Sean
    Smith, Karen
    Sauer, Mary Lou
    Bothe, Kellie
    Mangino, Jennifer
    Raque, Kathleen
    Kuritzky, Anne
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (SUPPL 2) : S266 - S267
  • [45] Screening for distress in women with gynaecological cancer: Adaptation of the distress thermometer for gynaecological oncology patients
    Harbeck, Emma
    Chambers, Suzanne
    Porter-Steele, Janine
    Anderson, Debra
    Sanmugarajah, Jasotha
    Hughes, Felicity
    Nehill, Caroline
    Seib, Charrlotte
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2021, 30 (06)
  • [46] Assessment of psychosocial distress in newly diagnosed gastrointestinal, breast, and lung cancer patients in an outpatient clinic
    Marll, Michael
    Davis, Kimberly
    Hughes, Cheryl
    Assarsson, Joanne
    Ellentuck, Leonard
    Liao, Ted
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2017, 26 : 56 - 56
  • [47] Distress Screening in Lung Cancer Patients using a Distress Thermometer: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhang, L.
    Liu, X.
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (03) : S170 - S170
  • [48] Subclinical atherosclerosis in newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients
    Levy, Julia A.
    Nadri, Maimoona
    Kazemian, Elham
    Atkins, Katelyn M.
    Gasho, Jordan O.
    Silos, Katrina D.
    Ramin, Cody
    Nikolova, Andriana P.
    Siegel, Erin M.
    Gigic, Biljana
    Toriola, Adetunji T.
    Ose, Jennifer
    Li, Christopher I.
    Shibata, David
    Ulrich, Cornelia M.
    Figueiredo, Jane C.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (06)
  • [49] Psycho-oncological screening in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsing breast cancer.
    Karthaus, Meinolf
    Schuth, I. C.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2012, 30 (27)
  • [50] Prevalence of emotional distress in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients
    Tracy Steinberg
    Michelle Roseman
    Goulnar Kasymjanova
    Sarah Dobson
    Lucie Lajeunesse
    Esther Dajczman
    Harvey Kreisman
    Neil MacDonald
    Jason Agulnik
    Victor Cohen
    Zeev Rosberger
    Martin Chasen
    David Small
    Supportive Care in Cancer, 2009, 17 : 1493 - 1497