Randomized, controlled trial comparing clinical outcomes of 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: an interim report

被引:29
|
作者
Lu, Jun [1 ]
Zheng, Chao-Hui [1 ]
Zheng, Hua-Long [1 ]
Li, Ping [1 ]
Xie, Jian-Wei [1 ]
Wang, Jia-Bin [1 ]
Lin, Jian-Xian [1 ]
Chen, Qi-Yue [1 ]
Cao, Long-Long [1 ]
Lin, Mi [1 ]
Tu, Ru-Hong [1 ]
Huang, Chang-Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Fujian Med Univ, Dept Gastr Surg, Union Hosp, 29 Xinquan Rd, Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, Peoples R China
关键词
Gastric cancer; 3D Laparoscopic gastrectomy; Randomized; controlled trial; 3-DIMENSIONAL LAPAROSCOPY; SURGICAL SKILLS; SINGLE-SURGEON; GASTRECTOMY; PERFORMANCE; SYSTEM; CLASSIFICATION; COMPLICATIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s00464-016-5310-2
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective In this study, we evaluated the short-term outcomes following three-dimensional (3D) or two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic surgery for patients with gastric cancer. Background There is a lack of prospective evidence regarding the safety and efficacy of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic surgery for patients with gastric cancer. Therefore, we conducted a phase III single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled trial to compare 3D and 2D laparoscopic surgery for patients with gastric cancer. Methods We compared operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph node dissections, morbidity, and mortality between the 3D and 2D groups following laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with ID number NCT02327481. Results A total of 228 patients were randomized (3D group 115 cases; 2D group 113 cases) between January 1, 2015 and September 1, 2015. Seven patients who underwent exploratory operations were excluded. Finally, a total of 221 patients were analyzed (3D group 109 cases, 2D group 112 cases). There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the clinical pathological characteristics, operating time (3D vs. 2D, 184 +/- 36 vs. 178 +/- 37 min, P = 0.288), number of lymph node dissections (36 +/- 14 vs. 37 +/- 13, P = 0.698), time to first ambulation (2.27 +/- 1.60 vs. 2.04 +/- 0.84, P = 0.18), flatus (3.89 +/- 1.49 vs. 3.69 +/- 1.12, P = 0.255), liquid diet (4.88 +/- 1.88 vs. 4.79 +/- 1.57, P = 0.684), or duration of postoperative hospital stay (12.52 +/- 4.83 vs. 12.63 +/- 7.32, P = 0.903). The postoperative complication rates of the 3D and 2D groups were 18.3 and 16.1%, respectively, P = 0.723. No patients died during the postoperative hospital stay. However, the intraoperative blood loss in the 3D group was significantly lower than the 2D group (58 +/- 75 vs. 78 +/- 72 ml, P = 0.047). Conclusion There was no significant difference in operation time and number of lymph node harvested between the 3D and 2D groups; however, 3D laparoscopic surgery may reduce the intraoperative blood loss compared to 2D procedure. Therefore, we conclude that this trial is safe and is thus ongoing.
引用
收藏
页码:2939 / 2945
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer
    Lujan, J.
    Valero, G.
    Hernandez, Q.
    Sanchez, A.
    Frutos, M. D.
    Parrilla, P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 96 (09) : 982 - 989
  • [42] Comparing 2D and 3D crystallization of Phenanthrene derivatives
    Helzy, Fatima
    Marris, Thierry
    Wuest, James D.
    ABSTRACTS OF PAPERS OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 2011, 241
  • [43] Standard D2 versus extended D2 (D2+) lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer: an interim safety analysis of a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial
    Kulig, Jan
    Popiela, Tadeusz
    Kolodziejczyk, Piotr
    Sierzega, Marek
    Szczepanik, Antoni
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 193 (01): : 10 - 15
  • [44] Clinical outcomes of three-dimensional versus two-dimensional laparoscopic surgery for gastric cancer: A single center, prospective, randomized trial-An interim report.
    Lin, Jian-Xian
    Huang, Changming
    Zheng, Chaohui
    Li, Ping
    Xie, Jianwei
    Wang, Jiabin
    Lu, Jun
    Chen, Qiyue
    Cao, Longlong
    Lin, Mi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (04)
  • [45] From 2D to 3D: the future of surgery?
    McLachlan, Greta
    LANCET, 2011, 378 (9800): : 1368 - 1368
  • [46] Dosimetric and Clinical Influence of 3D Versus 2D Planning in Postoperative Radiation Therapy for Gastric Cancer
    Lee, Jung Ae
    Ahn, Yong Chan
    Lim, Do Hoon
    Park, Hee Chul
    Asranbaeva, Margarita S.
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 47 (04): : 727 - 737
  • [47] 2D TO 3D VIDEO CONVERSION IMPACT ON FUNDAMENTALS OF LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY SKILLS TRAINING
    Huang, Jason
    Shapiro, Moshe
    Crivellaro, Simone
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2019, 201 (04): : E288 - E288
  • [48] 3D versus 2D laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Lima Fonseca Rodrigues, Amanda Cyntia
    Shojaeian, Fatemeh
    Thanawiboonchai, Theethawat
    Zevallos, Alba
    Greer, Jonathan
    Adrales, Gina L. L.
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (10): : 7914 - 7922
  • [49] 3D versus 2D laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Amanda Cyntia Lima Fonseca Rodrigues
    Fatemeh Shojaeian
    Theethawat Thanawiboonchai
    Alba Zevallos
    Jonathan Greer
    Gina L. Adrales
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 7914 - 7922
  • [50] Intraoperative and clinical outcomes in 3D versus 2D completely minimally invasive oesophagectomy for oesophageal cancer
    Abbasi, Omar
    Patel, Krashna
    Gundkalli, Zobia
    Tang, Cheuk Bong
    Lorenzi, Bruno
    Kadirkamanathan, Sritharan
    Jayanthi, Naga Venkatesh
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 106 : 80 - 80