Formulation of Bacillus spp. for biological control of plant diseases

被引:162
|
作者
Schisler, DA [1 ]
Slininger, RJ [1 ]
Behle, RW [1 ]
Jackson, MA [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Natl Ctr Agr Utilizat Res, Peoria, IL 61604 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1094/PHYTO.2004.94.11.1267
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Maximizing the potential for successfully developing and deploying a biocontrol product begins with a carefully crafted microbial screening procedure, proceeds with developing mass production protocols that optimize product quantity and quality, and ends with devising a product formulation that preserves shelf-life, aids product delivery, and enhances bioactivity. Microbial selection procedures that require prospective biocontrol agents to possess both efficacy and amenability to production in liquid culture increase the likelihood of selecting agents with enhanced commercial development potential. Scale-up of biomass production procedures must optimize product quantity without compromise of product efficacy or amenability to stabilization and formulation. Formulation of Bacillus spp. for use against plant pathogens is an enormous topic in general terms but limited in published specifics regarding formulations used in commercially available products. Types of formulations include dry products such as wettable powders, dusts, and granules, and liquid products including cell suspensions in water, oils, and emulsions. Cells can also be microencapsulated. Considerations critical to designing successful formulations of microbial biomass are many fold and include preserving biomass viability during stabilization, drying, and rehydration; aiding biomass delivery, target coverage, and target adhesion; and enhancing biomass survival and efficacy after delivery to the target. Solutions to these formulation considerations will not necessarily be compatible. Data from several biocontrol systems including the use of B. subtilis OH 131.1 (NRRL B-30212) to reduce Fusarium head blight of wheat are used to illustrate many of these issues. Using our recently described assay for efficiently evaluating biomass production and formulation protocols, we demonstrate the effectiveness, in vitro, of UV protectant compounds lignin (PC 1307) and Blankophor BBH in reducing OH 131.1 morbidity when cells were exposed to UV light from artificial sunlight.
引用
收藏
页码:1267 / 1271
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Screening of antagonistic fungi from Trichoderma spp. for biological control of important plant pathogens
    Naydenov, M.
    Draganova, D.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AND ECOLOGY, 2007, 8 (03): : 616 - 624
  • [32] Pseudomonas spp. in biological plant protection and growth promotion
    Nerek, Ewelina
    Sokolowska, Barbara
    AIMS ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2022, 9 (04) : 493 - 504
  • [33] Biological control of Gibberella zeae with Trichoderma spp.
    Cabrera, M.
    Pereyra, S. A.
    Vero, S.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2008, 98 (06) : S29 - S29
  • [34] Using Pseudomonas spp. for integrated biological control
    Stockwell, V. O.
    Stack, J.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2005, 95 (06) : S145 - S145
  • [35] Using Pseudomonas spp. for integrated biological control
    Stockwell, Virginia O.
    Stack, James P.
    PHYTOPATHOLOGY, 2007, 97 (02) : 244 - 249
  • [36] Biological control of plant diseases
    Alabouvette, C
    BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT: CONNECTING SCIENCE AND POLICY, 2000, : 257 - 264
  • [37] Biological control of plant diseases
    Philip A. O’Brien
    Australasian Plant Pathology, 2017, 46 : 293 - 304
  • [38] Biological control of plant diseases
    O'Brien, Philip A.
    AUSTRALASIAN PLANT PATHOLOGY, 2017, 46 (04) : 293 - 304
  • [39] Control potential of Meloidogyne java']javanica and Ditylenchus spp. using fluorescent Pseudomonas and Bacillus spp.
    Turatto, Marcielly F.
    Dourado, Fernanda dos S.
    Zulli, Jerri E.
    Botelho, Gloria R.
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 49 (01) : 54 - 58
  • [40] In vitro selection and identification of isolated of Trichoderma spp. and Bacillus spp. native to control Phymatotrichopsis omnivora
    Lopez-Valenzuela, B. E.
    Armenta-Bojorquez, A. D.
    Hernandez-Verdugo, S.
    Apodaca-Sanchez, M. A.
    Samaniego-Gaxiola, J. A.
    Leyva-Madrigal, K. Y.
    Valdez-Ortiz, A.
    ITEA-INFORMACION TECNICA ECONOMICA AGRARIA, 2015, 111 (04): : 310 - 325