共 50 条
Implementation of a Psychoeducational Program for Cancer Survivors and Family Caregivers at a Cancer Support Community Affiliate A Pilot Effectiveness Study
被引:29
|作者:
Dockham, Bonnie
[1
]
Schafenacker, Ann
[2
]
Yoon, Hyojin
[3
]
Ronis, David L.
[2
]
Kershaw, Trace
[4
]
Titler, Marita
[2
]
Northouse, Laurel
[2
]
机构:
[1] Canc Support Community Greater Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Nursing, 400 N Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Loyola Univ, Sch Nursing, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Yale Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, New Haven, CT USA
关键词:
Benefits of illness;
Cancer survivors;
Caregivers Effectiveness study;
Evidence-based program;
Implementation and dissemination;
Intervention study;
Quality of life;
Self-efficacy;
QUALITY-OF-LIFE;
RANDOMIZED CLINICAL-TRIAL;
RECURRENT BREAST-CANCER;
PROSTATE-CANCER;
SELF-EFFICACY;
INTERVENTION;
WOMEN;
METAANALYSIS;
TRANSLATION;
MANAGEMENT;
D O I:
10.1097/NCC.0000000000000311
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Background: Psychoeducational interventions, tested for efficacy in randomized clinical trials, are seldom implemented in clinical practice where cancer survivors and their family caregivers can benefit from them. Objective: This study examined the effectiveness of the FOCUS Program on cancer survivors' and their family caregivers' outcomes when implemented at a Cancer Support Community (CSC) affiliate by agency social workers. Study aims were to (1) test effects of the program on survivor and caregiver outcomes as a unit and (2) determine program feasibility in terms of enrollment, retention, intervention fidelity, and satisfaction. Methods: A preintervention and postintervention pilot effectiveness study was conducted with 34 cancer survivor-caregiver dyads (ie, pairs). The FOCUS Program, originally delivered by nurses in dyads' homes, was modified to a small-group format and delivered by CSC social workers. The primary outcome was quality of life (QOL). Intermediary outcomes were benefits of illness/caregiving, communication, support, and self-efficacy. Analyses included repeated-measures analysis of variance. Results: Dyads had significant improvements in total QOL; physical, emotional, and functional QOL; benefits of illness; and self-efficacy. Effect sizes were similar to prior randomized clinical trial findings. Although dyads were difficult to recruit (enrollment, 60%), both retention (92%) and intervention fidelity (94%) were high. Conclusions: It was possible to implement the FOCUS Program at a CSC affiliate by agency staff, obtain positive intervention effects, and maintain intervention fidelity. Implications for Practice: Researchers and clinicians need to collaborate to implement more evidence-based interventions in practice settings for cancer survivors and their family caregivers.
引用
收藏
页码:169 / 180
页数:12
相关论文