Consumer Perspectives on Access to Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Role of Demographic Factors and the Testing Experience

被引:26
|
作者
Gollust, Sarah E. [1 ]
Gray, Stacy W. [2 ]
Carere, Deanna Alexis [3 ]
Koenig, Barbara A. [4 ]
Lehmann, Lisa Soleymani [5 ,7 ]
McGuire, Amy L. [9 ]
Sharp, Richard R. [10 ,11 ]
Spector-Bagdady, Kayte [12 ,13 ]
Wang, Na [14 ]
Green, Robert C. [6 ,8 ]
Roberts, J. Scott [15 ]
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Hlth Policy & Management, 420 Delaware St SE,MMC 729, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Beckman Res Inst, City Hope Comprehens Canc Ctr, Monrovia, CA USA
[3] McMaster Univ, Dept Pathol & Mol Med, Genet Epidemiol, Hamilton, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Calif San Francisco, Inst Hlth & Aging, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[5] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Genet, Res Program Translat Genom & Hlth Outcomes G2P, Broad Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[7] Harvard Med Sch, Med, Boston, MA USA
[8] Harvard Med Sch, Boston, MA USA
[9] Baylor Coll Med, Ctr Med Eth & Hlth Policy, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[10] Mayo Clin, Biomed Eth Program, Ctr Individualized Med Bioeth Program, Rochester, MN USA
[11] Mayo Clin, Clin & Translat Res Eth Program, Rochester, MN USA
[12] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[13] Univ Michigan, Sch Med, Program Res Eth, CBSSM, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[14] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Data Coordinating Ctr, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[15] Univ Michigan, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav & Hlth Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
来源
MILBANK QUARTERLY | 2017年 / 95卷 / 02期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
genetic testing; ethics; regulation; public opinion; SELF-INTEREST; PUBLIC-OPINION; UNITED-STATES; ATTITUDES; POLICY; RISK; IMPACT; PERCEPTIONS; AWARENESS; SUPPORT;
D O I
10.1111/1468-0009.12262
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
ContextWhile policymakers have been considering the appropriateness of direct-to-consumer personal genomic testing (DTC-PGT) for more than a decade, there is little empirical data on consumers' views regarding the regulation of these products. No research has assessed whether consumers' personal experience with testing is related to their views about access to and regulation of DTC tests. MethodsData were analyzed from the PGen Study, a longitudinal prospective cohort of DTC-PGT customers of 23andMe (n = 564) and Pathway Genomics (n = 377; total N = 941). Consumers were sent an electronic survey before receiving genetic test results and again 6 months after receipt of results. FindingsAt the 6-month follow-up, more than 80% of participants believed that people have a right to access genetic information directly, that parents should be able to get DTC-PGT testing for their children, and that genetic information should be kept private. Participants supported health insurance coverage of PGT (60%), wider availability of PGT (68%), and inclusion of genetic information in medical records (63%). Participants were less supportive of government regulation (28%) and restricting testing to clinical settings (14%). Conservative political ideology was associated with less support for government regulation (P < 0.001), as was feeling more confident in one's genetic knowledge (P < 0.05). Participants' level of computed genetic risk for common diseases, as indicated by their actual test results received from companies, showed no relationship with attitudes. However, those who perceived that they had received elevated risk results expressed lower support for expanded availability and incorporation of PGT into health care (P < 0.01). Those who reported being upset by their genetic test results were less likely to endorse access to DTC products without a medical professional (P < 0.01). ConclusionsPGT consumers supported expanded access to these services and opposed additional regulation. Users who had a negative personal experience with PGT testing were less supportive of expanded availability without a medical professional.
引用
收藏
页码:291 / 318
页数:28
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a bibliometric analysis
    Xavier, Bracke
    McVeigh, T. P.
    IRISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 190 (SUPPL 2) : 73 - 73
  • [22] User Attitudes On Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Saha, Debjani
    Chan, Anna
    Stacy, Brook
    Javkar, Kiran
    Patkar, Sushant
    Mazurek, Michelle L.
    2020 5TH IEEE EUROPEAN SYMPOSIUM ON SECURITY AND PRIVACY (EUROS&P 2020), 2020, : 120 - 138
  • [23] Predictors of interest in direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Sweeny, Kate
    Legg, Angela M.
    PSYCHOLOGY & HEALTH, 2011, 26 (10) : 1259 - 1272
  • [24] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Comprehensive Review
    Jiang, Sharon
    Liberti, Lawrence
    Lebo, David
    THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE, 2023, 57 (6) : 1190 - 1198
  • [25] The Ethical Challenges of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing
    Cheryl Berg
    Kelly Fryer-Edwards
    Journal of Business Ethics, 2008, 77 : 17 - 31
  • [26] The ethics and regulation of direct-to-consumer genetic testing
    Paula Boddington
    Genome Medicine, 1
  • [27] Direct-to-consumer genetic testing - clinical considerations
    Trent, Ronald J.
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2013, 198 (09) : 496 - 498
  • [28] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Reliable or Risky?
    Spencer, David H.
    Lockwood, Christina
    Topol, Eric
    Evans, James P.
    Green, Robert C.
    Mansfield, Elizabeth
    Tezak, Zivana
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2011, 57 (12) : 1641 - 1644
  • [29] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk
    Majumder, Mary A.
    Guerrini, Christi J.
    McGuire, Amy L.
    ANNUAL REVIEW OF MEDICINE, VOL 72, 2021, 2021, 72 : 151 - 166
  • [30] Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing for Domestic Cats
    Lyons, Leslie A.
    Buckley, Reuben M.
    VETERINARY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA-SMALL ANIMAL PRACTICE, 2020, 50 (05) : 991 - +