Placing China ? s land marketization: The state, market, and the changing geography of land use in Chinese cities

被引:27
|
作者
Jiang, Ronghao [1 ]
Lin, George C. S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hong Kong, Dept Geog, Pokfulam Rd, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
Land market; Land use type; Urbanization; State-market relation; Neoliberalization; Chinese cities at and above the prefectural level; LOCAL PUBLIC-FINANCE; GOVERNMENT INTERVENTION; NEOLIBERAL URBANISM; MUNICIPAL FINANCE; OWNED ENTERPRISE; PROPERTY-RIGHTS; ECONOMIC-GROWTH; COMMODIFICATION; URBANIZATION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105293
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Existing theorization of the processes of urban transformation in different world regions has been based upon diverse interpretations of the interplay between the state and market forces. Studies of the growth and transformation of Chinese cities are characterized by continuing debates between those who insisted on the pivotal role played by the Chinese Party-state and others who envisioned urban China as moving decisively toward capitalism. This research examines the pattern and process of land marketization in urban China as a case to understand the interaction between the state and market forces in China?s ongoing urban transformation. Statistical analysis of the data for the Chinese cities at and above the prefectural level for the years of 2003?2017 has identified an uneven geography of land marketization effectively shaped by a localization of state-market interplay. A significant and positive correlation is found between the degree of land finance and extent of land marketization. The uneven geography of land marketization is significantly influenced by the legacy of the socialist planned economy as measured by the dominance of state-owned enterprises. However, the strength and direction of the correlation between the state and market are found to be contingent upon the level of urban economic growth. Spatial variation in land marketization is also shaped by the degree of openness, local state policies toward industrial vis-`a-vis commercial and residential land supply, population density, and the size of the city. Findings of this research call for a theoretical reconsideration of the state-market relationship in urban transformation more attentive to local conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] China's land market auctions: evidence of corruption?
    Cai, Hongbin
    Henderson, J. Vernon
    Zhang, Qinghua
    RAND JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2013, 44 (03): : 488 - 521
  • [22] Land Politics under Market Socialism: The State, Land Policies, and Rural-Urban Land Conversion in China and Vietnam
    Hoang Linh Nguyen
    Duan, Jin
    Zhang, Guo Qin
    LAND, 2018, 7 (02)
  • [23] Rediscovering Chinese cities through the lens of land-use patterns
    Lang, Wei
    Long, Ying
    Chen, Tingting
    LAND USE POLICY, 2018, 79 : 362 - 374
  • [24] Urban land expansion and arable land loss of the major cities in China in the 1990s
    Minghong Tan
    Xiubin Li
    Changhe Lu
    Science in China Series D: Earth Sciences, 2005, 48 : 1492 - 1500
  • [25] The Redevelopment of China's Construction Land: Practising Land Property Rights in Cities through Renewals
    Lin, George C. S.
    CHINA QUARTERLY, 2015, 224 : 865 - 887
  • [27] Urban land expansion and arable land loss of the major cities in China in the 1990s
    Tan, MH
    Li, XB
    Lu, CH
    SCIENCE IN CHINA SERIES D-EARTH SCIENCES, 2005, 48 (09): : 1492 - 1500
  • [28] Does Rural Construction Land Marketization Inhibit State-Owned Industrial Land Transactions? Evidence from Huzhou City, China
    Jiao, Man
    Xu, Hengzhou
    LAND, 2022, 11 (09)
  • [29] Differentiation and progress of urban regionalization in China: Perspectives of land use and geography
    Xu, Feng
    Wang, Zhanqi
    Chi, Guangqing
    Wang, Donghui
    Zhang, Zhexi
    Zuo, Danyu
    APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2021, 137
  • [30] Cooperation, land use, and the environment in Uxin Ju: The changing landscape of a Mongolian-Chinese borderland in China
    Jiang, H
    ANNALS OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN GEOGRAPHERS, 2004, 94 (01) : 117 - 139