Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers: In vitro and in vivo evaluation at 0.5 Tesla.

被引:26
|
作者
Sommer, T
Lauck, G
Schimpf, R
von Smekal, A
Wolke, S
Block, W
Gieseke, J
Schneider, C
Funke, HD
Schild, H
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Radiol Klin, D-53127 Bonn, Germany
[2] Krankenhaus Marienhof, Koblenz, Germany
[3] Univ Bonn, Med Klin & Poliklin, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[4] Univ Munich, Radiol Klin, Munich, Germany
[5] Univ Bonn, Inst Strahlen & Kernphys, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
[6] Philips Med Syst, Hamburg, Germany
[7] Univ Bonn, Klin Herz & Gefasschirurg, D-5300 Bonn, Germany
关键词
MRI; cardiac pacemakers; metal implants;
D O I
10.1055/s-2007-1015179
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: MRI is currently regarded as absolutely contraindicated in patients with implanted cardiac pacemakers. In this prospective study safety and feasibility of MRI in patients with new generation pacemakers (PM) was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Methods: 14 PM models in vitro and 18 patients with implanted new generation PM underwent a MRI exam at 0.5 Tesla with standard spin, turbo spin, and gradient echo (FFE) sequences under continuous EGG-monitoring. PM inquiry was performed before and after the MRI exam, including assessment of stimulation thresholds. Results: In the static magnetic field all PM switched to the asynchronous mode due to activation of the Reed switch, resulting in continuous pacing at a fixed rate. In three PM models in vitro, however, after activation of the Reed switch, there was a software-induced switch back to the demand mode. In these PM inhibition and triggering were observed after starting the MRI scan due to influence of the pulsed magnetic fields. PM program changes, damage of PM components, dislocation/torque of the PM and rapid pacing of the PM were observed neither in vitro nor in vivo. Atrial and ventricular stimulation thresholds remained unchanged. Conclusion: MRI at 0.5 Tesla should not be regarded as absolutely contraindicated in patients with implanted new generation PM. However, knowledge of the behaviour of the specific PM model in static and pulsed magnetic fields is required, if necessary also changes of the PM program prior to the MRI exam, continuous ECG monitoring and cardiological stand-by.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 43
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MRI for patients with pacemakers: In vitro and in vivo evaluation at 0.5 Tesla
    Sommer, T
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1998, 168 (06): : 634 - 635
  • [2] MRI for patients with pacemakers: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of 0.5 Tesla
    Moshage, W
    Achenbach, S
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 1998, 168 (06): : 634 - 634
  • [3] Interference with cardiac pacemakers by magnetic resonance imaging:: Are there irreversible changes at 0.5 Tesla?
    Vahlhaus, C
    Sommer, T
    Lewalter, T
    Schimpf, R
    Schumacher, B
    Jung, W
    Lüderitz, B
    PACE-PACING AND CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 24 (04): : 489 - 495
  • [4] Cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators:: In vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation at 1.5-Tesla
    Shellock, Frank G.
    Fischer, Laura
    Fieno, David S.
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2007, 9 (01) : 21 - 31
  • [5] Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
    Kiblboeck, D.
    Reiter, C.
    Kammler, J.
    Schmit, P.
    Blessberger, H.
    Kellermair, J.
    Lukas, T.
    Kypta, A.
    Fellner, F.
    Steinwender, C.
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2018, 130 : 113 - 113
  • [6] MR imaging and cardiac pacemakers:: In vitro evaluation and in vivo studies in 51 patients at 0.5 T
    Sommer, T
    Vahlhaus, C
    Lauck, G
    Von Smekal, A
    Reinke, M
    Hofer, U
    Block, W
    Träber, F
    Schneider, C
    Gieseke, J
    Jung, W
    Schild, H
    RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (03) : 869 - 879
  • [7] Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
    Daniel Kiblboeck
    Christian Reiter
    Juergen Kammler
    Pierre Schmit
    Hermann Blessberger
    Joerg Kellermair
    Franz Fellner
    Clemens Steinwender
    Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, 20
  • [8] Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers
    Kiblboeck, Daniel
    Reiter, Christian
    Kammler, Juergen
    Schmit, Pierre
    Blessberger, Hermann
    Kellermair, Joerg
    Fellner, Franz
    Steinwender, Clemens
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE, 2018, 20
  • [9] Magnetic Resonance Imaging at 1.5 Tesla in Patients with Cardiac Pacemakers: A prospective study in 388 patients
    Becker, Alexander
    Muehling, Olaf
    Gleixner, Julia
    Morhard, Dominik
    Wakili, Reza
    Brueckmann, Hartmut
    Knez, Andreas
    CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (21)
  • [10] Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac pacemakers
    Sommer, T
    Naehle, CP
    Schild, H
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2005, 46 (03) : 561 - 562