Establishing Clinical Cutoffs for Response and Remission on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED)

被引:33
|
作者
Caporino, Nicole E. [1 ]
Sakolsky, Dara [2 ]
Brodman, Douglas M. [3 ]
McGuire, Joseph F. [4 ]
Piacentini, John [4 ]
Penis, Tara S. [4 ]
Ginsburg, Golda S. [5 ]
Walkup, John T. [6 ]
Iyengar, Satish [7 ]
Kendall, Philip C. [8 ]
Birmaher, Boris [2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ, Washington, DC 20016 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] NYU, Langone Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[5] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Farmington, CT USA
[6] New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Med Ctr, New York, NY USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[8] Temple Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
关键词
anxiety; treatment; measurement; SIGNAL-DETECTION ANALYSIS; OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER; DEFINING TREATMENT RESPONSE; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; DSM-IV; INTERVIEW SCHEDULE; PARENT; SYMPTOMS; VALIDITY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jaac.2017.05.018
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine optimal percent reduction and raw score cutoffs on the parent- and child-report Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) for predicting treatment response and remission among youth with anxiety disorders. Method: Data were obtained from youth (N = 438; 7-17 years old) who completed treatment in the Child/Adolescent Anxiety Multimodal treatment Study, a multisite, randomized clinical trial that examined the relative efficacy of medication (sertraline), cognitive behavioral therapy (Coping Cat), their combination, and pill placebo for the treatment of separation anxiety disorder, generalized anxiety disorder, and social phobia. The parent- and youth-report SCARED were administered at pre- and posttreatment. Quality receiver operating characteristic methods evaluated the performance of various SCARED percent reduction and absolute cutoff scores in predicting treatment response and remission, as defined by posttreatment ratings on the Clinical Global Impression scales and the Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule. Results: Reductions of 55% on the SCARED-Parent and 50% on the SCARED-Youth optimally predicted treatment response. Posttreatment absolute raw scores of 10 (SCARED-Parent) and 12 (SCARED-Youth) optimally predicted remission in the total sample, although separate SCARED-Parent cutoffs for children (12-13) and adolescents (9) showed greatest quality of efficiency. Each cutoff significantly predicted response and remission at 6-month follow-up. Conclusion: Results serve as guidelines for operationalizing treatment response and remission on the SCARED, which could help clinicians systematically monitor treatment outcomes of youth with anxiety disorders in a cost and time-efficient manner.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 702
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Psychometric properties and factor structure of the Korean version of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED)
    Shin, Jiyoon
    Kim, Kyoung Min
    Lee, Kyung Hwa
    Hong, Soon-Beom
    Lee, Jung
    Choi, Chi-Hyun
    Han, Ji Youn
    Kim, Seong Hae
    Suh, Da Eun
    Cho, Soo-Churl
    Kim, Jae-Won
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [22] Sensitivity and Specificity of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): A Community-Based Study
    DeSousa, Diogo Araujo
    Salum, Giovanni Abrahao
    Isolan, Luciano Rassier
    Manfro, Gisele Gus
    CHILD PSYCHIATRY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2013, 44 (03) : 391 - 399
  • [23] German Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): Reliability, Validity, and Cross-Informant Agreement in a Clinical Sample
    Weitkamp K.
    Romer G.
    Rosenthal S.
    Wiegand-Grefe S.
    Daniels J.
    Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, 4 (1)
  • [24] Differences in Parent and Child Report on the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): Implications for Investigations of Social Anxiety in Adolescents
    Maureen E. Bowers
    Lori B. Reider
    Santiago Morales
    George A. Buzzell
    Natalie Miller
    Sonya V. Troller-Renfree
    Daniel S. Pine
    Heather A. Henderson
    Nathan A. Fox
    Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 2020, 48 : 561 - 571
  • [25] Differences in Parent and Child Report on the Screen for Child Anxiety-Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): Implications for Investigations of Social Anxiety in Adolescents
    Bowers, Maureen E.
    Reider, Lori B.
    Morales, Santiago
    Buzzell, George A.
    Miller, Natalie
    Troller-Renfree, Sonya V.
    Pine, Daniel S.
    Henderson, Heather A.
    Fox, Nathan A.
    JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 2020, 48 (04) : 561 - 571
  • [26] Psychometric properties of the screen for child anxiety related emotional disorders (SCARED) among elementary school children in Finland
    Kaajalaakso, Katri
    Lempinen, Lotta
    Ristkari, Terja
    Huttunen, Jukka
    Luntamo, Terhi
    Sourander, Andre
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 62 (01) : 34 - 40
  • [27] The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): Informant Discrepancy, Measurement Invariance, and Test–Retest Reliability
    Brigid Behrens
    Caroline Swetlitz
    Daniel S. Pine
    David Pagliaccio
    Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2019, 50 : 473 - 482
  • [28] Psychometric Properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) in a Non-Clinical Sample of Children and Adolescents in Saudi Arabia
    Arab, Arwa
    El Keshky, Mogeda
    Hadwin, Julie A.
    CHILD PSYCHIATRY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 47 (04) : 554 - 562
  • [29] Psychometric Properties of the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED) in a Non-Clinical Sample of Children and Adolescents in Saudi Arabia
    Arwa Arab
    Mogeda El Keshky
    Julie A. Hadwin
    Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 2016, 47 : 554 - 562
  • [30] The Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED): Informant Discrepancy, Measurement Invariance, and Test-Retest Reliability
    Behrens, Brigid
    Swetlitz, Caroline
    Pine, Daniel S.
    Pagliaccio, David
    CHILD PSYCHIATRY & HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 50 (03) : 473 - 482