Moral decision-making in video games: A focus group study on player perceptions

被引:23
|
作者
Holl, Elisabeth [1 ]
Bernard, Steve [1 ]
Melzer, Andre [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Luxembourg, Dept Behav & Cognit Sci, Inst Hlth & Behav, Media & Expt Lab, Esch Sur Alzette, Luxembourg
关键词
content analysis; decision-making; focus group; gamer; interactivity; meaningful play; moral (dis)engagement; morality; qualitative data; video games; GRATIFICATIONS; ENTERTAINMENT; CHARACTER; BAD;
D O I
10.1002/hbe2.189
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Moral dilemmas have become increasingly popular in single player video games, although it is still widely unknown why players find them pleasurable, how they process dilemmas, and which variables affect the processing. Therefore, three different focus groups sessions with experienced players (N = 16) were conducted. Player perceptions of meaningful and morally relevant decision situations in video games were grouped for topics and contextualized with theoretical background (e.g., moral disengagement theory). Our findings support the notion that moral decision-making in video games is a dynamic interplay between game and user-dependent variables. Results show that in addition to interactivity, which reflects the inherent property of video games, statements can be broadly grouped into factors that describe player motivation (i.e., why they morally engage or disengage) and influencing factors that shape the moral interaction itself. In summary, the present findings provide insights into players' processing of moral dilemmas in video games.
引用
收藏
页码:278 / 287
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Health Care Decision-Making A Focus Group Study Involving Health Professionals and the General Public
    Shrimpton, Bradley
    McKie, John
    Hurworth, Rosalind
    Bell, Catherine
    Richardson, Jeff
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (02) : 43 - +
  • [42] Clinicians' Decision-Making Regarding Telehealth Services: Focus Group Study in Pediatric Allied Health
    Thomas, Donna Claire
    Litherland, Eva Frances
    Masso, Sarah
    Raymundo, Gianina
    Keep, Melanie
    JMIR FORMATIVE RESEARCH, 2024, 8
  • [43] Family planning decision-making in relation to psychiatric disorders in women: a qualitative focus group study
    Ahmad, Shahenda A. I. H.
    Holtrop, Jorina
    van den Eijnden, Monique J. M.
    Jonkman, Nini H.
    van Pampus, Maria G.
    van den Heuvel, Odile A.
    Broekman, Birit F. P.
    Schonewille, Noralie N.
    REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH, 2024, 21 (01)
  • [44] Decision-Making during Games by Professional Handball Coaches Using Regulatory Focus Theory
    Debanne, Thierry
    Angel, Vincent
    Fontayne, Paul
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 26 (01) : 111 - 124
  • [45] The Adaptive Utility of Deontology: Deontological Moral Decision-Making Fosters Perceptions of Trust and Likeability
    Sacco D.F.
    Brown M.
    Lustgraaf C.J.N.
    Hugenberg K.
    Evolutionary Psychological Science, 2017, 3 (2) : 125 - 132
  • [46] Moral literacy and school leadership Perceptions of principals in southeast Ohio on the ethics of decision-making
    Lowery, Charles
    JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION, 2019, 58 (01) : 112 - 127
  • [47] Intertemporal Decision-Making for a Group
    Richard Yi
    Leila F. King
    Anne E. Carter
    Reid D. Landes
    Warren K. Bickel
    The Psychological Record, 2010, 60 : 577 - 586
  • [48] Group decision-making in animals
    L. Conradt
    T. J. Roper
    Nature, 2003, 421 : 155 - 158
  • [49] ON THE RATIONALE OF GROUP DECISION-MAKING
    Black, Duncan
    JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1948, 56 (01) : 23 - 34
  • [50] Group decision-making in animals
    Conradt, L
    Roper, TJ
    NATURE, 2003, 421 (6919) : 155 - 158