Sedation analgesia during office-based plastic surgery procedures: Comparison of two opioid regimens

被引:11
|
作者
Cinnella, Gilda
Meola, Salvatore
Portincasa, Aurelio
Parisi, Domenico
Morgese, Francesco
Pavone, Giovanna
Dambrosio, Michele
机构
[1] Univ Foggia, Dept Anesthesiol & Intens Care, Foggia, Italy
[2] Univ Foggia, Dept Plast Surg, Foggia, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.prs.0000260754.59310.38
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The combination of sedative and analgesic drugs is increasingly being used during minimally invasive surgery. The authors compared the clinical efficacy of two different fentanyl regimens, in combination with midazolam, for sedation analgesia in patients undergoing office-based plastic surgery procedures under local anesthesia. Methods: One-hundred patients were randomized into two groups of 50 subjects each. Group F-1 received a fentanyl bolus of 0.7 mu g/kg before infiltration with local anaesthetics; group F-2 received the same bolus plus 0.6 gg/kg fentanyl every 45 minutes. All patients received a midazolam bolus of 0.05 mu g/kg plus continuous infusion 0.08 mu g/kg per hour. Results: High-quality analgesia was obtained in every group, without significant differences between the two fentanyl regimens. Group F-1 was associated with lower intraoperative mean blood pressure and SpO(2) values compared with group F-1. No differences were detected between the two groups in perioperative side effects or postoperative pain. Conclusion: Higher doses of opioid did not improve the quality of perioperative patient comfort but acted synergistically with the sedative drugs, amplifying the hemodynamic and respiratory side effects.
引用
收藏
页码:2263 / 2270
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Management of the obese patient undergoing office-based oral and maxillofacial surgery procedures
    Chacon, GE
    Viehweg, TL
    Ganzberg, SI
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 62 (01) : 88 - 93
  • [32] Abdominoplasty: A comparison of outpatient and inpatient procedures shows that it is a safe and effective procedure for outpatients in an office-based surgery clinic
    Spiegelman, Jamie I.
    Levine, Ronald H.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 118 (02) : 517 - 522
  • [33] A comparison of patient satisfaction when office-based procedures are performed by general surgery residents versus an attending surgeon
    Wojcik, Brandon M.
    McKinley, Sophia K.
    Amari, Noor
    Chang, David C.
    Wachtel, Heather
    Petrusa, Emil
    Mullen, John T.
    Phitayakorn, Roy
    SURGERY, 2019, 166 (01) : 116 - 122
  • [34] COMPARISON OF MIDAZOLAM AND DIAZEPAM FOR SEDATION DURING PLASTIC-SURGERY
    WHITE, PF
    VASCONEZ, LO
    MATHES, SA
    WAY, WL
    WENDER, LA
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 1988, 81 (05) : 703 - 710
  • [35] Abdominoplasty: A comparison of outpatient and inpatient procedures shows that it is a safe and effective procedure for outpatients in an office-based surgery clinic - Discussion
    Mustoe, Thomas A.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2006, 118 (02) : 523 - 524
  • [36] A Comparison of Multimodal Analgesic Regimens for Opioid Reduction in Elective Plastic Surgery: A Randomized Study
    Long-Lijoi, Katherine L.
    Mukherjee, Hrijeeta
    Pinell, Ximena A.
    Grimmer, Karl
    Davison, Steven P.
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2023, 11 (08) : E5181
  • [37] Office-based ambulatory sedation - The use of the airway protector system during oral surgery: A prospective audit of the first 100 patients
    Klein, Moti
    Weksler, Nalan
    Weksler, Doron
    Bodner, Lipa
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2008, 66 (05) : 858 - 863
  • [38] The impact of music on patient tolerance during office-based laryngeal surgery
    Hamdan, Abdul-Latif
    Yammine, Yara
    Ghzayel, Lana
    Hosri, Jad
    Semaan, Zeina Maria
    Mourad, Marc
    LARYNGOSCOPE INVESTIGATIVE OTOLARYNGOLOGY, 2025, 10 (01):
  • [40] Hemodynamics and oxygen saturation during intravenous sedation for office-based laser-assisted uvuloplasty
    Cillo, JE
    Finn, R
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2005, 63 (06) : 752 - 755