Comparative clinical evaluation of atlas and deep-learning-based auto-segmentation of organ structures in liver cancer

被引:65
|
作者
Ahn, Sang Hee [1 ]
Yeo, Adam Unjin [2 ]
Kim, Kwang Hyeon [1 ]
Kim, Chankyu [1 ]
Goh, Youngmoon [3 ]
Cho, Shinhaeng [4 ]
Lee, Se Byeong [1 ]
Lim, Young Kyung [1 ]
Kim, Haksoo [1 ]
Shin, Dongho [1 ]
Kim, Taeyoon [1 ]
Kim, Tae Hyun [1 ]
Youn, Sang Hee [1 ]
Oh, Eun Sang [1 ]
Jeong, Jong Hwi [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Canc Ctr, Proton Therapy Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, 323 Ilsan Ro, Goyang Si 10408, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Asan Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Chonnam Natl Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Med Sch, Gwangju, South Korea
关键词
Contouring; Atlas-based auto-segmentation; Deep-learning-based auto-segmentation; Deep convolution neural network (DCNN); CT IMAGES; REGISTRATION; HEAD;
D O I
10.1186/s13014-019-1392-z
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background Accurate and standardized descriptions of organs at risk (OARs) are essential in radiation therapy for treatment planning and evaluation. Traditionally, physicians have contoured patient images manually, which, is time-consuming and subject to inter-observer variability. This study aims to a) investigate whether customized, deep-learning-based auto-segmentation could overcome the limitations of manual contouring and b) compare its performance against a typical, atlas-based auto-segmentation method organ structures in liver cancer. Methods On-contrast computer tomography image sets of 70 liver cancer patients were used, and four OARs (heart, liver, kidney, and stomach) were manually delineated by three experienced physicians as reference structures. Atlas and deep learning auto-segmentations were respectively performed with MIM Maestro 6.5 (MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, OH) and, with a deep convolution neural network (DCNN). The Hausdorff distance (HD) and, dice similarity coefficient (DSC), volume overlap error (VOE), and relative volume difference (RVD) were used to quantitatively evaluate the four different methods in the case of the reference set of the four OAR structures. Results The atlas-based method yielded the following average DSC and standard deviation values (SD) for the heart, liver, right kidney, left kidney, and stomach: 0.92 +/- 0.04 (DSC +/- SD), 0.93 +/- 0.02, 0.86 +/- 0.07, 0.85 +/- 0.11, and 0.60 +/- 0.13 respectively. The deep-learning-based method yielded corresponding values for the OARs of 0.94 +/- 0.01, 0.93 +/- 0.01, 0.88 +/- 0.03, 0.86 +/- 0.03, and 0.73 +/- 0.09. The segmentation results show that the deep learning framework is superior to the atlas-based framwork except in the case of the liver. Specifically, in the case of the stomach, the DSC, VOE, and RVD showed a maximum difference of 21.67, 25.11, 28.80% respectively. Conclusions In this study, we demonstrated that a deep learning framework could be used more effectively and efficiently compared to atlas-based auto-segmentation for most OARs in human liver cancer. Extended use of the deep-learning-based framework is anticipated for auto-segmentations of other body sites.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 13
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Deep Learning-Based Auto-Segmentation of Glioblastoma in Brain Cancer Radiotherapy
    Sadeghi, S.
    Gholami, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (06)
  • [32] Deep learning-based auto-segmentation of clinical target volumes for radiotherapy treatment of cervical cancer
    Ma, Chen-Ying
    Zhou, Ju-Ying
    Xu, Xiao-Ting
    Guo, Jian
    Han, Miao-Fei
    Gao, Yao-Zong
    Du, Hui
    Stahl, Johannes N.
    Maltz, Jonathan S.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 23 (02):
  • [33] Organ Specific Deep Learning-Based Correction of Inaccurate Auto-Segmentation on Abdominal MRI
    Sarosiek, C.
    Zhang, Y.
    Ding, J.
    Amjad, A.
    Dang, N. P.
    Zarenia, M.
    Conlin, R.
    Li, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : S118 - S119
  • [34] Evaluation of auto-segmentation for brachytherapy of postoperative cervical cancer using deep learning-based workflow
    Wang, Jiahao
    Chen, Yuanyuan
    Tu, Yeqiang
    Xie, Hongling
    Chen, Yukai
    Luo, Lumeng
    Zhou, Pengfei
    Tang, Qiu
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (05):
  • [35] Deep-Learning-Based Auto Segmentation (DLAS) of Organs at Risk in the Head and Neck Region: A Clinical Evaluation
    Johnson, C.
    Tsai, P.
    Yu, G.
    Apinorasethkul, C.
    Hu, L.
    Xiong, W.
    Zhai, A.
    Press, R.
    Lin, H.
    Huang, S.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2022, 49 (06) : E124 - E124
  • [36] Evaluation of Atlas-Based Auto-Segmentation On Daily In-Room CT for Prostate Cancer
    Li, W.
    Zhong, Y.
    Vassil, A.
    Xia, P.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (06) : 3676 - 3676
  • [37] Deep-Learning-Based Multi-Organ Auto-Segmentation on 3D Transrectal Ultrasound for Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Brachytherapy
    Yang, X.
    Lei, Y.
    Wang, T.
    Roper, J. R.
    Patel, S. A.
    Jani, A.
    Bradley, J. D.
    Patel, P. R.
    Liu, T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2021, 111 (03): : E119 - E119
  • [38] Clinical Usability-Oriented Automatic Contour Quality Evaluation for Deep Learning Auto-Segmentation
    Zhang, Y.
    Amjad, A.
    Ding, J.
    Sarosiek, C.
    Zarenia, M.
    Conlin, R.
    Dang, N. P.
    Hall, W. A.
    Erickson, B. A.
    Paulson, E. S.
    Li, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : S144 - S145
  • [39] Evaluation of a Deep-Learning Auto-Segmentation Model of Cardiac Substructures
    Tam, A.
    Liu, J. R.
    Ketcherside, T.
    Eustace, N. J.
    Chen, Q.
    Chen, Y. J.
    Liu, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2023, 117 (02): : E724 - E725
  • [40] Clinical evaluation of deep learning–based clinical target volume three-channel auto-segmentation algorithm for adaptive radiotherapy in cervical cancer
    Chen-ying Ma
    Ju-ying Zhou
    Xiao-ting Xu
    Song-bing Qin
    Miao-fei Han
    Xiao-huan Cao
    Yao-zong Gao
    Lu Xu
    Jing-jie Zhou
    Wei Zhang
    Le-cheng Jia
    BMC Medical Imaging, 22