Validity and Reliability of the Dutch Adaptation of the Actinic Keratosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (AKQoL)

被引:4
|
作者
Vis, Kelly [1 ]
Waalboer-Spuij, Rick [1 ,2 ]
Snels, Dyon G. C. T. M. [3 ]
Hollestein, Loes M. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC Canc Inst, Dept Dermatol, Postbus 2040, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Elisabeth TweeSteden Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Tilburg, Netherlands
[3] Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Dept Dermatol, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Canc Registry, Netherlands Comprehens Canc Org IKNL, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
Actinic keratosis; Health-related quality of life; GRONINGEN FRAILTY INDICATOR; SPANISH VERSION; SOLAR KERATOSES; POPULATION; PREVALENCE; SKIN;
D O I
10.1159/000489118
中图分类号
R75 [皮肤病学与性病学];
学科分类号
100206 ;
摘要
Background: The Actinic Keratosis Quality of Life Questionnaire (AKQoL) is a disease-specific instrument to measure the impact of actinic keratosis (AK) on patients' lives. Objective: To validate and test the psychometric properties of the AKQoL translated into the Dutch language (AKQoL-NL). Methods: All new patients >= 50 years of age with untreated AK in a university medical center and a general hospital between August 2014 and August 2015 were eligible. The AKQoL was obtained and repeated after 2 weeks. The feasibility was tested by missing responses and response distribution. The internal consistency reliability of each domain was investigated with the Cronbach alpha, and test-retest reliability and validity with the Spearman correlation coefficient. AKQoL scores were compared to the Skindex-17 for convergent validity and to the Groningen Frailty Indicator scores for divergent validity. Results: A total of 153 of 190 eligible patients consented to participate. Feasibility analysis showed that none of the items missed >= 10% of responses but 5 of the 9 items showed floor effect. The AKQoL subscales showed a moderate internal consistency (Cronbach a = 0.235-0.468) and an excellent test-retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficient = 0.997-1). The AKQoL correlated poorly with the symptom component and moderately with the psychosocial component of the Skindex-17 (rho = -0.015 to 0.346 and 0.324 to 0.501, respectively), which is less than expected. The AKQoL scored poorly in both of the Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) components (rho = -0.97 to 0.12 and 0.185 to 0.276, respectively), as expected. Conclusion: The AKQoL-NL is a feasible, moderately valid, and moderately reliable health-related quality of life questionnaire. (C) 2018 The Author(s) Published by S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 65
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Chinese version of the chronic urticaria quality of life questionnaire: cultural adaptation, factor analysis, assessment of reliability and validity
    Zhao, Zuotao
    Zhang, Chong
    Jiang, Yu
    Peng, Cong
    Zhu, Wu
    Zhao, Shuang
    Chen, Xiang
    Li, Jie
    ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2022, 314 (09) : 847 - 855
  • [32] The Turkish version of the angioedema quality of life questionnaire and angioedema activity score: cultural adaptation, assessment of reliability and validity
    Kocaturk, E.
    Degirmentepe, E.
    Gelincik, A.
    Demir, S.
    Aydin, O.
    Baskan, E. B.
    Buyukozturk, S.
    Colakoglu, B.
    Maurer, M.
    Weller, K.
    ALLERGY, 2017, 72 : 710 - 710
  • [33] Reliability and validity of the Dutch translation of the Work Design Questionnaire
    Gorgievski, Marjan J.
    Peeters, Patty
    Rietzschel, Eric F.
    Bipp, Tanja
    GEDRAG & ORGANISATIE, 2016, 29 (03): : 273 - 301
  • [34] Reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the Readiness to Change Questionnaire
    Defuentes-Merillas, L
    Dejong, CAJ
    Schippers, GM
    ALCOHOL AND ALCOHOLISM, 2002, 37 (01): : 93 - 99
  • [35] Reliability and validity of the Dutch Recovery Stress Questionnaire for athletes
    Nederhof, Esther
    Brink, Michel S.
    Lemmink, Koen A. P. M.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORT PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 39 (04) : 301 - 311
  • [36] Validity and reliability of the Dutch version of the displaced aggression questionnaire
    Smeijers, Danique
    Denson, Thomas F.
    Bulten, Erik H.
    Brazil, Inti A.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2021, 11 (12): : 1288 - 1300
  • [37] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF A QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE IN CANCER-PATIENTS
    BALLATORI, E
    ROILA, F
    BASURTO, C
    BRACARDA, S
    PICCIAFUOCO, M
    SOLDANI, M
    CRINO, L
    TONATO, M
    MILELLA, G
    DELFAVERO, A
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 29A : S63 - S69
  • [38] VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE SUBJECTIVE QUALITY-OF-LIFE PROFILE (PQVS)
    GERIN, P
    DAZORD, A
    CIALDELLA, P
    LEIZOROVICZ, A
    BOISSEL, JP
    THERAPIE, 1991, 46 (02): : 131 - 138
  • [39] Quality of life in osteoporosis: Reliability, consistency, and validity of the osteoporosis assessment questionnaire
    Randell, AG
    Bhalerao, N
    Nguyen, TV
    Sambrook, PN
    Eisman, JA
    Silverman, SL
    JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1998, 25 (06) : 1171 - 1179
  • [40] Assessment of the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a Spanish asthma quality of life questionnaire
    Perpiñá, M
    Belloch, A
    Marks, GB
    Martinez-Moragón, E
    Pascual, LM
    Compte, L
    JOURNAL OF ASTHMA, 1998, 35 (06) : 513 - 521