Dental Implant Rehabilitation After Jaw Reconstruction Assisted by Virtual Surgical Planning

被引:9
|
作者
Zhu, Houwei [1 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ]
Cai, Zhigang [1 ]
Shan, Xiaofeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Sch & Hosp Stomatol, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, 22 South Ave, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
关键词
dental implants; dental rehabilitation; jaw reconstruction; surgical navigation; virtual planning; FIBULA-FREE-FLAP; OSSEOUS FREE FLAPS; MANDIBULAR RECONSTRUCTION; SUPPORTED PROSTHESES; OUTCOMES; OVERDENTURES; EXPERIENCE; GRAFTS;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.7278
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate effects of preoperative virtual planning and jaw reconstruction guided by dental implant rehabilitation on dental prosthesis rehabilitation after jaw reconstruction. Materials and Methods: Patients indicated for segmental jaw resection and who agreed to receive jaw reconstruction procedures were enrolled in the study. Appropriate surgical procedures were determined by a maxillofacial surgeon and a prosthodontist before surgery. The virtual design was created according to preoperative computed tomography. Patients were divided into navigation and non-navigation groups. Implant surgery was performed 6 months after reconstruction surgery. After treatment completion, factors such as survival rate of implants, site of reconstruction, type of graft, and type of prosthesis were compared. Results: In total, 29 patients were included in the study, with 16 patients in the non-navigation group and 13 in the navigation group. A total of 101 implants were inserted, and the implant success rate was 98.02% (2 implants extracted due to peri-implantitis). All patients received prosthetic treatment. Of the 13 navigation group patients, 9 received fixed implant-supported prostheses, whereas the other 4 received removable dentures. Of the 16 non-navigation group patients, 9 eventually received fixed implant-supported prostheses and 7 received removable dentures. There were no significant intergroup differences in terms of prosthesis type (P = .702). However, the proportion of fixed implant-supported prostheses in the navigation group was higher compared with the non-navigation group. Conclusion: Preoperative virtual planning and dental implant rehabilitation-guided jaw reconstruction through preoperative designing can provide a good opportunity to achieve high rates of implant success and dental rehabilitation. This method can also benefit fixed implant-supported prosthetic restorations. Moreover, the use of navigation after virtual planning has no effect on the type of prosthetic reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:1219 / 1226
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Immediate Dental Implantation in Oncologic Jaw Reconstruction: Workflow Optimization to Decrease Time to Full Dental Rehabilitation
    Allen, Robert J., Jr.
    Shenaq, Deana S.
    Rosen, Evan B.
    Patel, Snehal G.
    Ganly, Ian
    Boyle, Jay O.
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Matros, Evan
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2019, 7 (01)
  • [32] A new concept for mandible reconstruction after oncological resection: Multisegment virtual surgical planning
    Ismayilzade, Majid
    Yildiz, Kemalettin
    Canter, Halil Ibrahim
    JOURNAL OF STOMATOLOGY ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 125 (03)
  • [33] A Virtual Surgical Planning Algorithm for Delayed Maxillomandibular Reconstruction
    Stranix, John T.
    Stern, Carrie S.
    Rensberger, Michael
    Ganly, Ian
    Boyle, Jay O.
    Allen, Robert J.
    Disa, Joseph J.
    Mehrara, Babak J.
    Garfein, Evan S.
    Matros, Evan
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 143 (04) : 1197 - 1206
  • [34] Virtual Surgical Planning for Reconstruction of Giant Ameloblastoma of the Mandible
    Moro, Alessandro
    Pelo, Sandro
    Gasparini, Giulio
    Saponaro, Gianmarco
    Todaro, Mattia
    Pisano, Giusi
    D'Amato, Giuseppe
    Doneddu, Piero
    ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2020, 85 (01) : 43 - 49
  • [35] Virtual surgical planning in complex composite maxillofacial reconstruction
    Saad, Adam
    Winters, Ryan
    Wise, M. Whitten
    Dupin, Charles L.
    St.Hilaire, Hugo
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2013, 132 (03) : 626 - 633
  • [36] Auricular Reconstruction With Ultra-Short Dental Implant-retained Prosthesis: A Case Report on Virtual Planning Software and 3D Surgical Guides
    Song, Gun
    Park, Ji-su
    Jung, Seunggon
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2024, 35 (08) : e798 - e800
  • [37] Virtual Surgical Planning for Inferior Alveolar Nerve Reconstruction
    Miloro, Michael
    Markiewicz, Michael R.
    JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 75 (11) : 2442 - 2448
  • [38] Virtual Surgical Planning for Oncologic Mandibular and Maxillary Reconstruction
    Myers, Paige L.
    Nelson, Jonas A.
    Rosen, Evan B.
    Allen, Robert J., Jr.
    Disa, Joseph J.
    Matros, Evan
    PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY-GLOBAL OPEN, 2021, 9 (09) : E3672
  • [39] Virtual Surgical Planning for Intracranial Intraosseous Meningioma Reconstruction
    Shah, Rema
    Lu, Xiaona
    Dinis, Jacob
    Junn, Alexandra
    Alperovich, Michael
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (07) : 2536 - 2538
  • [40] A Zygomatic Bone Study Using Virtual Dental Implant Planning Software
    Moro, Sidnei Antonio
    Thome, Geninho
    Marques Padovan, Luis Eduardo
    da Silva, Ricarda Duarte
    Tiossi, Rodrigo
    Gasparini Kiatake Fontao, Flavia Noemy
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2022, 48 (03) : 171 - 176