What influences contraceptive behaviour in women who experience unintended pregnancy? A systematic review of qualitative research

被引:18
|
作者
Pratt, R. [1 ]
Stephenson, J. [1 ]
Mann, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Margaret Pyke Ctr Study & Training Family Planning, UCL Dept SRH Res, London W1T 4PL, England
关键词
Adherence; contraception behaviour; pregnancy; qualitative research; DECISION-MAKING; CONTROLLED-TRIALS; META-ETHNOGRAPHY; ABORTION; INFORMATION; INTERNET; HEALTH;
D O I
10.3109/01443615.2014.920783
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
One in five pregnancies in the UK ends in abortion. The great majority of those pregnancies are unintended, resulting from incorrect, inconsistent or non-use of contraception, rather than contraception failure. We undertook a synthesis of qualitative research with women who have unintended pregnancies as a new approach to understanding contraceptive behaviour. A literature search was carried out using four databases. Identified studies were screened against pre-set inclusion criteria. Included studies were quality assessed. Analysis followed a meta-ethnographic approach. A total of 236 studies were identified, of which nine were included. Six categories involved in contraceptive behaviour were identified - access, method factors, knowledge, societal influence, personal beliefs and motivations and relationship factors. A model of contraceptive behaviour was developed. Contraceptive behaviour is a complex, multifactorial process. Interventions targeting one aspect are unlikely to make a difference; however identifying and affecting the important factors within a population may improve contraception adherence.
引用
收藏
页码:693 / 699
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] COMPARISON OF UNINTENDED PREGNANCY RATES AMONG WOMEN WHO INITIATED ORAL CONTRACEPTIVE THERAPY WITH A 84/7 ESTRADIOL OR A 84/7 PLACEBO
    Brewster, C.
    Lage, M. J.
    Grubb, E.
    VALUE IN HEALTH, 2012, 15 (07) : A543 - A544
  • [32] Perspectives on pregnancy in women with chronic kidney disease: systematic review of qualitative studies
    Tong, Allison
    Jesudason, Shilpa
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Winkelmayer, Wolfgang C.
    NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2015, 30 (04) : 652 - 661
  • [33] Women's experiences of social support during pregnancy: a qualitative systematic review
    Al-Mutawtah, Mona
    Campbell, Emma
    Kubis, Hans-Peter
    Erjavec, Mihela
    BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [34] Women’s experiences of social support during pregnancy: a qualitative systematic review
    Mona Al-Mutawtah
    Emma Campbell
    Hans-Peter Kubis
    Mihela Erjavec
    BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 23
  • [35] A qualitative systematic review exploring factors influencing health behaviour change during pregnancy
    Rockliffe, Lauren
    Heazell, Alex
    Peters, Sarah
    Smith, Debbie
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE AND INFANT PSYCHOLOGY, 2022, 40 (02) : CVIII - CVIII
  • [36] What are adult psychiatric inpatients' experience of seclusion: A systematic review of qualitative studies
    Askew, Louise
    Fisher, Paul
    Beazley, Peter
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC AND MENTAL HEALTH NURSING, 2019, 26 (7-8) : 274 - 285
  • [37] Healthcare seeking behaviour of women who experience domestic violence in Sri Lanka: A qualitative study
    Silva, Tharuka
    Agampodi, Thilini
    Evans, Maggie
    Knipe, Duleeka
    Rathnayake, Abey
    Rajapakse, Thilini
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2022, 78 : 65 - 65
  • [38] Women's experiences of endometriosis: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research
    Young, Kate
    Fisher, Jane
    Kirkman, Maggie
    JOURNAL OF FAMILY PLANNING AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE, 2015, 41 (03): : 225 - 234
  • [39] How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research
    Woof, Victoria G.
    Howell, Anthony
    McWilliams, Lorna
    Evans, D. Gareth
    French, David P.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2022, 127 (11) : 1916 - 1924
  • [40] How do women who are informed that they are at increased risk of breast cancer appraise their risk? A systematic review of qualitative research
    Victoria G. Woof
    Anthony Howell
    Lorna McWilliams
    D. Gareth Evans
    David P. French
    British Journal of Cancer, 2022, 127 : 1916 - 1924