Strong Stability Preserving Integrating Factor Two-Step Runge-Kutta Methods

被引:13
|
作者
Isherwood, Leah [1 ]
Grant, Zachary J. [2 ]
Gottlieb, Sigal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Math Dept, 285 Old Westport Rd, Dartmouth, MA 02747 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Dept Computat & Appl Math, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA
关键词
Strong stability preserving; Time stepping for hyperbolic PDEs; Integrating factor methods; Lawson type methods; Multi-step Runge-Kutta methods; EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION; IMPLICIT; CONTRACTIVITY; MONOTONICITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10915-019-01046-6
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Problems with components that feature significantly different time scales, where the stiff timestep restriction comes from a linear component, implicit-explicit (IMEX) methods alleviate this restriction if the concern is linear stability. However, when nonlinear non-inner-product stability properties are of interest, such as in the evolution of hyperbolic partial differential equations with shocks or sharp gradients, linear inner-product stability is no longer sufficient for convergence, and so strong stability preserving (SSP) methods are often needed. Where the SSP property is needed, IMEX SSP Runge-Kutta (SSP-IMEX) methods have very restrictive time-steps. An alternative to SSP-IMEX schemes is to adopt an integrating factor approach to handle the linear component exactly and step the transformed problem forward using some time-evolution method. The strong stability properties of integrating factor Runge-Kutta methods were established in Isherwood et al. (SIAM J Numer Anal 56(6):3276-3307, 2018), where it was shown that it is possible to define explicit integrating factor Runge-Kutta methods that preserve strong stability properties satisfied by each of the two components when coupled with forward Euler time-stepping. It was proved that the solution will be SSP if the transformed problem is stepped forward with an explicit SSP Runge-Kutta method that has non-decreasing abscissas. However, explicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods have an order barrier of p = 4, and sometimes higher order is desired. In this work we consider explicit SSP two-step Runge-Kutta integrating factor methods to raise the order. We show that strong stability is ensured if the two-step Runge-Kutta method used to evolve the transformed problem is SSP and has non-decreasing abscissas. We find such methods up to eighth order and present their SSP coefficients. Adding a step allows us to break the fourth order barrier on explicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods; furthermore, our explicit SSP two-step Runge-Kutta methods with non-decreasing abscissas typically have larger SSP coefficients than the corresponding one-step methods. A selection of our methods are tested for convergence and demonstrate the design order. We also show, for selected methods, that the SSP time-step predicted by the theory is a lower bound of the allowable time-step for linear and nonlinear problems that satisfy the total variation diminishing (TVD) condition. We compare some of the non-decreasing abscissa SSP two-step Runge-Kutta methods to previously found
引用
收藏
页码:1446 / 1471
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Strong stability-preserving three-derivative Runge-Kutta methods
    Qin, Xueyu
    Jiang, Zhenhua
    Yu, Jian
    Huang, Lintao
    Yan, Chao
    COMPUTATIONAL & APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 2023, 42 (04):
  • [42] STRONG STABILITY PRESERVING EXPLICIT RUNGE-KUTTA METHODS OF MAXIMAL EFFECTIVE ORDER
    Hadjimichael, Yiannis
    Macdonald, Colin B.
    Ketcheson, David I.
    Verner, James H.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 51 (04) : 2149 - 2165
  • [43] Derivation of Three-Derivative Two-Step Runge-Kutta Methods
    Qin, Xueyu
    Yu, Jian
    Yan, Chao
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (05)
  • [44] A CLASS OF IMPLICIT-EXPLICIT TWO-STEP RUNGE-KUTTA METHODS
    Zharovsky, Evgeniy
    Sandu, Adrian
    Zhang, Hong
    SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2015, 53 (01) : 321 - 341
  • [45] Continuous two-step Runge-Kutta methods for ordinary differential equations
    D'Ambrosio, Raffaele
    Jackiewicz, Zdzislaw
    NUMERICAL ALGORITHMS, 2010, 54 (02) : 169 - 193
  • [46] Implementation of two-step Runge-Kutta methods for ordinary differential equations
    Tracogna, S
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1996, 76 (1-2) : 113 - 136
  • [47] Efficient two-step Runge-Kutta methods for fluid dynamics simulations
    Figueroaa, Alejandro
    Jackiewicz, Zdzislaw
    Lohner, Rainald
    APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 2021, 159 : 1 - 20
  • [48] Explicit pseudo two-step Runge-Kutta methods for parallel computers
    Cong, NH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER MATHEMATICS, 1999, 73 (01) : 77 - 91
  • [49] Functionally fitted explicit pseudo two-step Runge-Kutta methods
    Hoang, Nguyen S.
    Sidje, Roger B.
    APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 2009, 59 (01) : 39 - 55
  • [50] Nonlinear Stability and Convergence of Two-Step Runge-Kutta Methods for Neutral Delay Differential Equations
    Yuan, Haiyan
    Song, Cheng
    Wang, Peichen
    MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2013, 2013