Strong Stability Preserving Integrating Factor Two-Step Runge-Kutta Methods

被引:13
|
作者
Isherwood, Leah [1 ]
Grant, Zachary J. [2 ]
Gottlieb, Sigal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Math Dept, 285 Old Westport Rd, Dartmouth, MA 02747 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Dept Computat & Appl Math, Oak Ridge, TN 37830 USA
关键词
Strong stability preserving; Time stepping for hyperbolic PDEs; Integrating factor methods; Lawson type methods; Multi-step Runge-Kutta methods; EFFICIENT IMPLEMENTATION; IMPLICIT; CONTRACTIVITY; MONOTONICITY;
D O I
10.1007/s10915-019-01046-6
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
Problems with components that feature significantly different time scales, where the stiff timestep restriction comes from a linear component, implicit-explicit (IMEX) methods alleviate this restriction if the concern is linear stability. However, when nonlinear non-inner-product stability properties are of interest, such as in the evolution of hyperbolic partial differential equations with shocks or sharp gradients, linear inner-product stability is no longer sufficient for convergence, and so strong stability preserving (SSP) methods are often needed. Where the SSP property is needed, IMEX SSP Runge-Kutta (SSP-IMEX) methods have very restrictive time-steps. An alternative to SSP-IMEX schemes is to adopt an integrating factor approach to handle the linear component exactly and step the transformed problem forward using some time-evolution method. The strong stability properties of integrating factor Runge-Kutta methods were established in Isherwood et al. (SIAM J Numer Anal 56(6):3276-3307, 2018), where it was shown that it is possible to define explicit integrating factor Runge-Kutta methods that preserve strong stability properties satisfied by each of the two components when coupled with forward Euler time-stepping. It was proved that the solution will be SSP if the transformed problem is stepped forward with an explicit SSP Runge-Kutta method that has non-decreasing abscissas. However, explicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods have an order barrier of p = 4, and sometimes higher order is desired. In this work we consider explicit SSP two-step Runge-Kutta integrating factor methods to raise the order. We show that strong stability is ensured if the two-step Runge-Kutta method used to evolve the transformed problem is SSP and has non-decreasing abscissas. We find such methods up to eighth order and present their SSP coefficients. Adding a step allows us to break the fourth order barrier on explicit SSP Runge-Kutta methods; furthermore, our explicit SSP two-step Runge-Kutta methods with non-decreasing abscissas typically have larger SSP coefficients than the corresponding one-step methods. A selection of our methods are tested for convergence and demonstrate the design order. We also show, for selected methods, that the SSP time-step predicted by the theory is a lower bound of the allowable time-step for linear and nonlinear problems that satisfy the total variation diminishing (TVD) condition. We compare some of the non-decreasing abscissa SSP two-step Runge-Kutta methods to previously found
引用
收藏
页码:1446 / 1471
页数:26
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] STRONG STABILITY PRESERVING TWO-STEP RUNGE-KUTTA METHODS
    Ketcheson, David I.
    Gottlieb, Sigal
    Macdonald, Colin B.
    SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2011, 49 (06) : 2618 - 2639
  • [2] Strong Stability Preserving Integrating Factor Two-Step Runge–Kutta Methods
    Leah Isherwood
    Zachary J. Grant
    Sigal Gottlieb
    Journal of Scientific Computing, 2019, 81 : 1446 - 1471
  • [3] STRONG STABILITY PRESERVING INTEGRATING FACTOR RUNGE-KUTTA METHODS
    Isherwood, Leah
    Grant, Zachary J.
    Gottlieb, Sigal
    SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2018, 56 (06) : 3276 - 3307
  • [4] Strong Stability Preserving Two-Derivative Two-Step Runge-Kutta Methods
    Qin, Xueyu
    Jiang, Zhenhua
    Yan, Chao
    MATHEMATICS, 2024, 12 (16)
  • [5] Downwinding for preserving strong stability in explicit integrating factor Runge-Kutta methods
    Isherwood, Leah
    Grant, Zachary J.
    Gottlieb, Sigal
    PURE AND APPLIED MATHEMATICS QUARTERLY, 2018, 14 (01) : 3 - 25
  • [6] Two-step Runge-Kutta Methods with Quadratic Stability Functions
    D. Conte
    R. D’Ambrosio
    Z. Jackiewicz
    Journal of Scientific Computing, 2010, 44 : 191 - 218
  • [7] Two-step Runge-Kutta Methods with Quadratic Stability Functions
    Conte, D.
    D'Ambrosio, R.
    Jackiewicz, Z.
    JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC COMPUTING, 2010, 44 (02) : 191 - 218
  • [8] Explicit two-step Runge-Kutta methods
    Skvortsov L.M.
    Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations, 2010, 2 (2) : 222 - 231
  • [9] Representations of Runge-Kutta methods and strong stability preserving methods
    Higueras, I
    SIAM JOURNAL ON NUMERICAL ANALYSIS, 2005, 43 (03) : 924 - 948
  • [10] On the implementation of explicit two-step peer methods with Runge-Kutta stability
    Abdi, A.
    Hojjati, G.
    Jackiewicz, Z.
    Podhaisky, H.
    Sharifi, M.
    APPLIED NUMERICAL MATHEMATICS, 2023, 186 : 213 - 227