Journalism Ethics and the Goldwater Rule in a "Post-Truth" Media World

被引:0
|
作者
Levine, Meredith A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Western Univ, Fac Informat & Media Studies, London, ON, Canada
[2] Canadian Assoc Journalists Eth Comm, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
MENTAL-ILLNESS; PSYCHIATRISTS; PRESIDENTS; MURDERERS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
This article strongly supports the Goldwater Rule, a position arrived at through an exploration of journalism ethics and practice norms for reporting on public figures, and justified by three claims. First, there is a seldom-acknowledged contradiction in ethics when it comes to journalistic reporting on public figures, one that is increasingly difficult to navigate in the current media climate. Second, the goal of informing and educating the public through offering a professional opinion about the mental health of public figures is often misaligned with the realities of journalistic storytelling. Third, there are ways to inform and educate the public about mental health and public figures that do not violate the Goldwater Rule.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 248
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条