Validation of asthma recording in electronic health records: protocol for a systematic review

被引:9
|
作者
Nissen, Francis [1 ]
Quint, Jennifer K. [2 ]
Wilkinson, Samantha [1 ]
Mullerova, Hana [3 ]
Smeeth, Liam [1 ]
Douglas, Ian J. [1 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Dept Noncommunicable Dis Epidemiol, London, England
[2] Imperial Coll, Natl Heart & Lung Inst, London, England
[3] GlaxoSmithKline Res & Dev Ltd, RWD & Epidemiol, Uxbridge, Middx, England
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2017年 / 7卷 / 05期
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
asthma; Electronic Health Records; Negative Predictive Value; Positive Predictive Value; sensitivity; specificity; validation;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014694
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Asthma is a common, heterogeneous disease with significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. It can be difficult to define in epidemiological studies using electronic health records as the diagnosis is based on non-specific respiratory symptoms and spirometry, neither of which are routinely registered. Electronic health records can nonetheless be valuable to study the epidemiology, management, healthcare use and control of asthma. For health databases to be useful sources of information, asthma diagnoses should ideally be validated. The primary objectives are to provide an overview of the methods used to validate asthma diagnoses in electronic health records and summarise the results of the validation studies. Methods EMBASE and MEDLINE will be systematically searched for appropriate search terms. The searches will cover all studies in these databases up to October 2016 with no start date and will yield studies that have validated algorithms or codes for the diagnosis of asthma in electronic health records. At least one test validation measure (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value or other) is necessary for inclusion. In addition, we require the validated algorithms to be compared with an external golden standard, such as a manual review, a questionnaire or an independent second database. We will summarise key data including author, year of publication, country, time period, date, data source, population, case characteristics, clinical events, algorithms, gold standard and validation statistics in a uniform table. Ethics and dissemination This study is a synthesis of previously published studies and, therefore, no ethical approval is required. The results will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal for publication. Results from this systematic review can be used to study outcome research on asthma and can be used to identify case definitions for asthma. PROSPERO registration number CRD42016041798.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Electronic health records (EHR) simulation-based training: a scoping review protocol
    Nuamah, Joseph K.
    Adapa, Karthik
    Mazur, Lukasz
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (08):
  • [42] The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Electronic Health Records A Systematic Literature Review
    Maritz, Roxanne
    Aronsky, Dominik
    Prodinger, Birgit
    APPLIED CLINICAL INFORMATICS, 2017, 8 (03): : 964 - 980
  • [43] Social determinants of health in electronic health records and their impact on analysis and risk prediction: A systematic review
    Chen, Min
    Tan, Xuan
    Padman, Rema
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (11) : 1764 - 1773
  • [44] Sanao decoction for asthma Protocol of a systematic review
    Chen, Guoming
    Chen, Yijun
    Chen, Ziyin
    Gao, Shuai
    Zhang, Peng
    Zhang, Honghui
    Huang, Yanfen
    Lin, Yingtong
    Wei, Li
    MEDICINE, 2019, 98 (18)
  • [45] Validation of a European message standard for Electronic Health Records
    Markwell, D
    Fogarty, L
    Hinchley, A
    MEDICAL INFORMATICS EUROPE '99, 1999, 68 : 818 - 823
  • [46] Validation of an electronic frailty index with electronic health records: eFRAGICAP index
    Francesc Orfila
    Lucía A. Carrasco-Ribelles
    Rosa Abellana
    Albert Roso-Llorach
    Francisco Cegri
    Carlen Reyes
    Concepción Violán
    BMC Geriatrics, 22
  • [47] Validation of an electronic frailty index with electronic health records: eFRAGICAP index
    Orfila, Francesc
    Carrasco-Ribelles, Lucia A.
    Abellana, Rosa
    Roso-Llorach, Albert
    Cegri, Francisco
    Reyes, Carlen
    Violan, Concepcion
    BMC GERIATRICS, 2022, 22 (01)
  • [48] Defining asthma and assessing asthma outcomes using electronic health record data: a systematic scoping review
    Al Sallakh, Mohammad A.
    Vasileiou, Eleftheria
    Rodgers, Sarah E.
    Lyons, Ronan A.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    Davies, Gwyneth A.
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2017, 49 (06)
  • [49] Systematic review of electronic health records to manage chronic conditions among displaced populations
    Buford, Anna
    Ashworth, Henry Charles
    Ezzeddine, Farrah Lynn
    Dada, Sara
    Nguyen, Eliza
    Ebrahim, Senan
    Zhang, Amy
    Lebovic, Jordan
    Hamvas, Lena
    Prokop, Larry J.
    Midani, Sally
    Chilazi, Michael
    Alahdab, Fares
    BMJ OPEN, 2022, 12 (09):
  • [50] Training medical students and residents in the use of electronic health records: a systematic review of the literature
    Rajaram, Akshay
    Hickey, Zachary
    Patel, Nimesh
    Newbigging, Joseph
    Wolfrom, Brent
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL INFORMATICS ASSOCIATION, 2020, 27 (01) : 175 - 180