Vasa previa: The impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes

被引:209
|
作者
Oyelese, Y
Catanzarite, V
Prefumo, F
Lashley, S
Schachter, M
Tovbin, Y
Goldstein, V
Smulian, JC
机构
[1] UMDNJ, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci,Robert Wood John, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[2] Georgetown Univ Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[3] Sharp Perinatal Ctr, San Diego, CA USA
[4] Sharp Mary Birch Hosp, San Diego, CA USA
[5] Univ London St Georges Hosp, Sch Med, Fetal Med Unit, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, London SW17 0RE, England
[6] Tel Aviv Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Assaf Harofeh Med Ctr, IL-69978 Tel Aviv, Israel
[7] Vasa Previa Fdn, Moline, IL USA
来源
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY | 2004年 / 103卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000123245.48645.98
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate outcomes and predictors of neonatal survival in pregnancies complicated by vasa previa and to compare outcomes in prenatally diagnosed cases of vasa previa with those not diagnosed prenatally. METHODS: We performed a multicenter study of 155 pregnancies complicated by vasa previa. Cases were obtained from the Vasa Previa Foundation and 6 large hospitals. Comparisons were made between groups based on prenatal diagnosis status and neonatal survival. RESULTS: The overall perinatal mortality was 36% (55 of 155). In 61 cases (39%), vasa previa was diagnosed prenatally; 59 of 61 (97%) infants from these pregnancies survived compared with 41 of 94 (44%) in cases not diagnosed prenatally (P < .001). Median 1- and 5-minute Apgar scores in cases diagnosed prenatally were 8 and 9, respectively, compared with 1 and 4 among survivors in cases not diagnosed prenatally (P < .001). More than half (24 of 41) of surviving neonates born to women without prenatal diagnosis required blood transfusions compared with 2 of 59 diagnosed prenatally (P < .001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that the only significant predictors of neonatal survival were prenatal diagnosis (P < .001) and gestational age at delivery (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: Good outcomes with vasa previa depend primarily on prenatal diagnosis and cesarean delivery at 35 weeks of gestation or earlier should rupture of membranes, labor, or significant bleeding occur. ( (C) 2004 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.).
引用
收藏
页码:937 / 942
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Diagnosis and management of vasa previa: a questionnaire survey
    Ioannou, C.
    Wayne, C.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 35 (02) : 205 - 209
  • [42] Prenatal diagnosis of vasa praevia in routine clinical practice: Prevention of stillbirths and impact on perinatal outcomes
    Zhang, Weiyu
    Giacchino, Tara
    Hickey, Harriet
    Ghanem, Yehia
    Akolekar, Ranjit
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2025, 305 : 117 - 121
  • [43] Individualized management of vasa previa and neonatal outcomes
    Saji, Shota
    Hasegawa, Junichi
    Oyelese, Yinka
    Furuya, Natsumi
    Homma, Chika
    Nishimura, Yoko
    Nakamura, Masamitsu
    Suzuki, Nao
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY RESEARCH, 2023, 49 (11) : 2680 - 2685
  • [44] Vasa previa: prenatal detection by three-dimensional ultrasonography
    Lee, W
    Kirk, JS
    Comstock, CH
    Romero, R
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 16 (04) : 384 - 387
  • [45] Vasa Previa
    Oyelese, Yinka
    Javinani, Ali
    Shamshirsaz, Alireza A.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 142 (03): : 503 - 518
  • [46] VASA PREVIA
    VOLK, GE
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1979, 135 (02) : 286 - 286
  • [47] VASA PREVIA
    BLAKE, TF
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1958, 75 (05) : 1117 - 1119
  • [48] VASA PREVIA
    QUEK, SP
    TAN, KL
    AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1972, 12 (03): : 206 - &
  • [49] VASA PREVIA
    PAHUJA, A
    MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 1976, 1 (15) : 526 - 528
  • [50] VASA PREVIA
    REUTER, KL
    DAVIDOFF, A
    HUNTER, T
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1988, 16 (05) : 346 - 348