Action Control of Colorectal Cancer Screening Participation with fecal immunochemical test (FIT)

被引:5
|
作者
Le Bonniec, Alice [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gourlan, Mathieu [1 ,2 ]
Preau, Marie [3 ]
Cousson-Gelie, Florence [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montpellier, Univ Paul Valery Montpellier 3, Epsylon EA4556, Montpellier, France
[2] Montpellier Canc Inst, Prevent Dept, Epidaure, Montpellier, France
[3] Univ Lumiere Lyon 2, Res Grp Social Psychol GRePS, EA4163, Lyon, France
关键词
Colorectal cancer; Intention-behavior gap; Planning; Screening; Theory of planned behavior; PROTECTION MOTIVATION THEORY; PLANNED BEHAVIOR; INTENTIONS;
D O I
10.1007/s12529-021-09976-y
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Background Most of the individuals concerned by colorectal cancer screening recognize the importance of screening participation. However, the screening rates for this cancer remain low in most countries, including France. Based on the action control framework, the present study aimed to (i) explore the distribution of intentions-behavior profiles toward colorectal cancer screening and (ii) to determine to what extent the profiles could be differentiated on theory of planned behavior (TPB) (i.e., attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioral control [PBC]) and self-regulation variables (i.e., action planning, coping planning). Method A total of 149 participants from the general French population (M = 60 years, SD = 7.04) completed a questionnaire measuring TPB and self-regulation variables. Subsequent screening behavior was determined from medical records. Participants were notably categorized as non-intenders, unsuccessful intenders, or successful intenders. Data were analyzed using discriminant function analysis and analyses of covariance. Results Main findings revealed that 71% of the intenders were unsuccessful intenders. TPB and self-regulation variables were significantly correlated with the discriminant function (rs >= .40). Successful and unsuccessful intenders reported significantly higher levels of subjective norms, PBC, and coping planning than non-intenders (ps < .01). Successful intenders reported a significantly higher level of coping planning than unsuccessful intenders (p < .01). Conclusions Further research appears necessary to empirically test to what extent interventions targeting subjective norms, PBC, and coping planning could enhance the proportion of successful intenders toward colorectal cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页码:122 / 130
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Making FIT Count: Maximizing Appropriate Use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening Programs
    Cusumano, Vivy T.
    May, Folasade P.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (06) : 1870 - 1874
  • [22] Fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin in combination with fecal transferrin in colorectal cancer screening
    Gies, Anton
    Cuk, Katarina
    Schrotz-King, Petra
    Brenner, Hermann
    UNITED EUROPEAN GASTROENTEROLOGY JOURNAL, 2018, 6 (08) : 1223 - 1231
  • [23] Colorectal cancer screening with faecal immunochemical test: Patterns of participation
    Heyman, Hanna
    Blom, Johannes
    Saraste, Deborah
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2024, 31 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [24] INCREASED PARTICIPATION IN COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING DURING A PILOT OF FAECAL IMMUNOCHEMICAL TEST FOR HAEMOGLOBIN (FIT) IN ENGLAND
    Moss, S.
    Mathews, C.
    Day, T.
    Smith, S.
    Halloran, S. P.
    GUT, 2015, 64 : A1 - A1
  • [25] Performance of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) in Patients With a Family History of Colorectal Cancer
    Moosavi, Sarvenaz
    Gentile, Laura
    Gondara, Lovedeep
    McGahan, Colleen
    Enns, Robert A.
    Telford, Jennifer J.
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 150 (04) : S452 - S452
  • [26] Sustaining annual colorectal cancer screening in rural community health clinics using the fecal immunochemical test (FIT).
    Arnold, Connie L.
    Davis, Terry C.
    Rademaker, Alfred
    Morris, James
    Mills, Glenn
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2018, 27 (07) : 110 - 111
  • [27] A quantifiable fecal immunochemical test (FIT) for hemoglobin facilitates balancing sensitivity with specificity when screening for colorectal cancer
    Smith, A
    Young, GP
    Cole, S
    Morcom, J
    Chandler, H
    La Pointe, L
    GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (04) : A199 - A199
  • [28] Similar fecal immunochemical test results in screening and referral colorectal cancer
    van Turenhout, Sietze T.
    van Rossum, Leo G. M.
    Oort, Frank A.
    Laheij, Robert J. F.
    van Rijn, Anne F.
    Droste, Jochim S. Terhaar Sive
    Fockens, Paul
    van der Hulst, Rene W. M.
    Bouman, Anneke A.
    Jansen, Jan B. M. J.
    Meijer, Gerrit A.
    Dekker, Evelien
    Mulder, Chris J. J.
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2012, 18 (38) : 5397 - 5403
  • [29] Fecal immunochemical test accuracy in familial risk colorectal cancer screening
    Castro, Ines
    Cubiella, Joaquin
    Rivera, Concepcion
    Gonzalez-Mao, Carmen
    Vega, Pablo
    Soto, Santiago
    Hernandez, Vicent
    Iglesias, Felipe
    Teresa Alves, Maria
    Bujanda, Luis
    Fernandez-Seara, Javier
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 134 (02) : 367 - 375
  • [30] Fecal immunochemical test in cancer screening - colonoscopy outcome in FIT positives and negatives
    Wilen, Hanna Ribbing
    Blom, Johannes
    Hoijer, Jonas
    Andersson, Gaya
    Lowbeer, Christian
    Hultcrantz, Rolf
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2019, 54 (03) : 303 - 310