A Randomized Comparison Between Infraclavicular Block and Targeted Intracluster Injection Supraclavicular Block

被引:35
|
作者
Yazer, Murray S. [1 ]
Finlayson, Roderick J. [1 ]
Tran, De Q. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Montreal Gen Hosp, Dept Anesthesia, Montreal, PQ H3G 1A4, Canada
关键词
BRACHIAL-PLEXUS BLOCK; ULTRASOUND; SINGLE;
D O I
10.1097/AAP.0000000000000193
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: This prospective, randomized trial compared ultrasound-guided targeted intracluster injection (TII) supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCB) and infraclavicular brachial plexus block (ICB). Methods: Sixty-four patients were randomly allocated to receive an ultrasound-guided TII SCB (n = 32) or ICB (n = 32). The local anesthetic agent (lidocaine 1.5% with epinephrine 5 mu g/mL) was identical in all subjects. In the TII SCB group, half the volume (16 mL) was injected inside the largest neural cluster (confluence of trunks and divisions of the brachial plexus). Subsequently, the remaining half (16 mL) was divided into equal aliquots and injected inside every single satellite cluster. In the ICB group, the entire volume (35 mL) was injected dorsal to the axillary artery. During the performance of the block, the performance time, number of needle passes, procedural pain, and complications (vascular puncture, paresthesia) were recorded. Subsequently, a blinded observer assessed the onset time, incidence of Horner syndrome, and success rate (surgical anesthesia). The main outcome variable was the total anesthesia-related time (sum of performance and onset times). Results: Due to a quicker onset [8.9 (5.6) vs 17.6 (5.3) minutes; P < 0.001], the total anesthesia-related time was shorter with TII SCB [18.2 (6.1) vs 22.8 (5.3) minutes; P < 0.001]. However no differences were observed between the 2 groups in terms of success rate (93.7%-96.9%), block-related pain scores, and adverse events such as vascular puncture and paresthesia. Expectedly, the ICB group required fewer needle passes (2 vs 6; P < 0.001) as well as shorter needling [4.8 (2.3) vs 9.0 (2.9) minutes; P < 0.001] and performance [5.6 (2.3) vs 9.5 (2.9) minutes; P < 0.001] times. Moreover, the ICB approach was associated with a decreased incidence of Horner syndrome (3.1% vs 53.1%; P < 0.001). Conclusions: Ultrasound-guided TII SCB and ICB provide comparable success rates. Due to its quick onset, TII SCB results in a shorter total anesthesia-related time.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 15
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block is more rapidly performed but less complete than ultrasound-guided supraclavicular block
    Arcand, G.
    Williams, S. R.
    Chouinard, P.
    Boudreault, D.
    Harris, P.
    Ruel, M.
    Girard, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 21 : 111 - 112
  • [32] A multicenter, randomized comparison between 2, 5, and 8 mg of perineural dexamethasone for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block
    Bravo, Daniela
    Aliste, Julian
    Layera, Sebastian
    Fernandez, Diego
    Leurcharusmee, Prangmalee
    Samerchua, Artid
    Tangjitbampenbun, Amornrat
    Watanitanon, Arraya
    Arnuntasupakul, Vanlapa
    Tunprasit, Choosak
    Gordon, Aida
    Finlayson, Roderick J.
    Tran, De Q.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2019, 44 (01) : 46 - 51
  • [33] Randomized comparison between perineural dexamethasone and combined perineural dexamethasone-dexmedetomidine for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular block
    Aliste, Julian
    Layera, Sebastian
    Bravo, Daniela
    Aguilera, German
    Erpel, Hans
    Garcia, Armando
    Lizama, Marcelo
    Finlayson, Roderick J.
    Tran, De Q.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 47 (09) : 554 - 559
  • [34] Assessment of the Incidence of Hemi-Diaphragmatic Paralysis Following Infraclavicular and Supraclavicular Approaches for Brachial Plexus Block: A Randomized Controlled Study
    Parameswari, Aruna
    Paul, Anisha Pauline
    Krithika, U.
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2025, 53 (01) : 20 - 27
  • [35] A Prospective, Randomized Comparison Between Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular, Infraclavicular, and Axillary Brachial Plexus Blocks
    Tran, De Quang Hieu
    Russo, Gianluca
    Munoz, Loreto
    Zaouter, Cedrick
    Finlayson, Roderick J.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2009, 34 (04) : 366 - 371
  • [36] A Randomized Comparison of Infraclavicular and Supraclavicular Continuous Peripheral Nerve Blocks for Postoperative Analgesia
    Mariano, Edward R.
    Sandhu, NavParkash S.
    Loland, Vanessa J.
    Bishop, Michael L.
    Madison, Sarah J.
    Abrams, Reid A.
    Meunier, Matthew J.
    Ferguson, Eliza J.
    Ilfeld, Brian M.
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2011, 36 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [37] Randomized Comparison of Extrafascial Versus Subfascial Injection of Local Anesthetic During Ultrasound-Guided Supraclavicular Brachial Plexus Block
    Sivashanmugam, T.
    Ray, Suja
    Ravishankar, M.
    Jaya, V.
    Selvam, E.
    Karmakar, Manoj Kumar
    REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE, 2015, 40 (04) : 337 - 343
  • [38] Speed of onset of 'corner pocket supraclavicular' and infraclavicular ultrasound guided brachial plexus block: a randomised observer-blinded comparison
    Fredrickson, M. J.
    Patel, A.
    Young, S.
    Chinchanwala, S.
    ANAESTHESIA, 2009, 64 (07) : 738 - 744
  • [39] Comparison of para-vascular supraclavicular brachial plexus block and costo-clavicular approach of infraclavicular brachial plexus block in providing surgical anesthesia for below elbow surgery: a randomized, single blind study
    Waindeskar, Vaishali
    Raj, Charan
    Jain, Anuj
    Trivedi, Saurabh
    AIN SHAMS JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 14 (01)
  • [40] Infraclavicular brachial plexus block versus humeral block in trauma patients: A comparison of patient comfort
    Minville, V
    Fourcade, O
    Idabouk, L
    Claassen, J
    Chassery, C
    Nguyen, L
    Pourrut, JC
    Benhamou, D
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (03): : 912 - 915