INCORPORATING MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS INTO STATICS COURSE: A CASE STUDY OF VIRTUAL PLATFORM VERSUS TEXTBOOK METHODOLOGY

被引:0
|
作者
Barbosa, J. [1 ]
Ochoa, J. Restrepo [1 ]
Berrio, J. Arenas [1 ]
机构
[1] EAFIT Univ, Medellin, Colombia
关键词
Assessment; Statics; Engineering education; multiple-choice questions; virtual platform;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Traditionally, textbooks for Statics in Engineering request the final answers of the exercises without providing a guide for the students to verify step by step their procedure with partial answers, so that a virtual platform was used to implement multiple-choice questions with single response as an alternative to guide students in the solution of exercises. This work presents the use of the learning management system, Moodie, with embedded answers (cloze) to program the topics of the course through exercises and apply assignments and tests with multiple-choice questions with single response methodology, as a result, we compared exercises developed in the platform with exercises on the book about structures of engineering, and it is obtained a better procedural guide for students. In conclusion, it can be said that the method used in the Statics course in EAFIT University is a good pedagogical practice because students can perform a partial verification of the answers
引用
收藏
页码:8485 / 8489
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] AI versus human-generated multiple-choice questions for medical education: a cohort study in a high-stakes examination
    Law, Alex K. K.
    So, Jerome
    Lui, Chun Tat
    Choi, Yu Fai
    Cheung, Koon Ho
    Hung, Kevin Kei-ching
    Graham, Colin Alexander
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2025, 25 (01)
  • [23] Nursing students collaborating to develop multiple-choice exam revision questions: A student engagement study
    Craft, Judy A.
    Christensen, Martin
    Shaw, Natasha
    Bakon, Shannon
    NURSE EDUCATION TODAY, 2017, 59 : 6 - 11
  • [24] E-ASSESSMENT WITH MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS: A 5 YEAR STUDY OF STUDENTS' OPINIONS AND EXPERIENCE
    Babo, Rosalina
    Babo, Lurdes, V
    Suhonen, Jarkko T.
    Tukiainen, Markku
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION-INNOVATIONS IN PRACTICE, 2020, 19 : 1 - 29
  • [25] Student- versus teacher-generated explanations for answers to online multiple-choice questions: What are the differences?
    Yu, Fu-Yun
    Chen, Chiao-Yi
    COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2021, 173
  • [26] Estimating the Effect on Grades of Using Multiple-Choice Versus Constructive-Response Questions: Data From the Classroom
    Hickson, Stephen
    Reed, W. Robert
    Sander, Nicholas
    EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT, 2012, 17 (04) : 200 - 213
  • [27] Assessment of the Quality of Multiple-Choice Questions in the Surgery Course for an Integrated Curriculum, University of Bisha College of Medicine, Saudi Arabia
    Al Ameer, Ahmed Y.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (12)
  • [28] Using Performance Improvement Methods to Evaluate Processes for Writing Multiple-Choice Test Questions in the Postlicensure Clinical Environment: A Case Study
    Davidson, Judy E.
    Kalinowski, Amy
    Makhija, Hirsh
    Schneid, Stephen D.
    Mandel, Jess
    JOURNAL OF CONTINUING EDUCATION IN NURSING, 2024, 55 (11):
  • [29] Large language models in pathology: A comparative study of ChatGPT and Bard with pathology trainees on multiple-choice questions
    Du, Wei
    Jin, Xueting
    Harris, Jaryse Carol
    Brunetti, Alessandro
    Johnson, Erika
    Leung, Olivia
    Li, Xingchen
    Walle, Selemon
    Yu, Qing
    Zhou, Xiao
    Bian, Fang
    Mckenzie, Kajanna
    Kanathanavanich, Manita
    Ozcelik, Yusuf
    El-Sharkawy, Farah
    Koga, Shunsuke
    ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY, 2024, 73
  • [30] What faculty write versus what students see? Perspectives on multiple-choice questions using Bloom's taxonomy
    Monrad, Seetha U.
    Zaidi, Nikki L. Bibler
    Grob, Karri L.
    Kurtz, Joshua B.
    Tai, Andrew W.
    Hortsch, Michael
    Gruppen, Larry D.
    Santen, Sally A.
    MEDICAL TEACHER, 2021, 43 (05) : 575 - 582