Multicollinearity and measurement error in structural equation models: Implications for theory testing

被引:796
|
作者
Grewal, R [1 ]
Cote, JA
Baumgartner, H
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Smeal Coll Adm, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] Washington State Univ, Vancouver, WA 98686 USA
关键词
multicollinearity; measurement error; structural equation models;
D O I
10.1287/mksc.1040.0070
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The literature on structural equation models is unclear on whether and when multicollinearity may pose problems in theory testing (Type 11 errors). Two Monte Carlo simulation experiments show that multicollinearity can cause problems under certain conditions, specifically: (1) when multicollinearity is extreme, Type 11 error rates are generally unacceptably high (over 80%), (2) when multicollinearity is between 0.6 and 0.8, Type 11 error rates can be substantial (greater than 50% and frequently above 80%) if composite reliability is weak, explained variance (R-2) is low, and sample size is relatively small. However, as reliability improves (0.80 or higher), explained variance R-2 reaches 0.75, and sample becomes relatively large, Type 11 error rates become negligible. (3) When multicollinearity is between 0.4 and 0.5, Type 11 error rates tend to be quite small, except when reliability is weak, R-2 is low, and sample size is small, in which case error rates can still be high (greater than 50%). Methods for detecting and correcting multicollinearity are briefly discussed. However, since multicollinearity is difficult to manage after the fact, researchers should avoid problems by carefully managing the factors known to mitigate multicollinearity problems (particularly measurement error).
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 529
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Using structural equation models to evaluate the magnitude of measurement error in blood pressure
    Batista-Foguet, JM
    Coenders, G
    Ferragud, MA
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2001, 20 (15) : 2351 - 2368
  • [22] STRUCTURAL IMPLICATIONS OF MEASUREMENT ERROR IN SOCIOMETRY
    HOLLAND, PW
    LEINHARDT, S
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL SOCIOLOGY, 1973, 3 (01): : 85 - 111
  • [23] MULTICOLLINEARITY AND MEASUREMENT ERROR IN ECONOMETRIC FINANCIAL MODELING
    GREEN, CJ
    KIERNAN, E
    MANCHESTER SCHOOL OF ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL STUDIES, 1989, 57 (04): : 357 - 369
  • [24] THE EFFECT OF MEASUREMENT ERROR IN STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING
    LOMAX, RG
    JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL EDUCATION, 1986, 54 (03): : 157 - 162
  • [25] Testing Nonnested Structural Equation Models
    Merkle, Edgar C.
    You, Dongjun
    Preacher, Kristopher J.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2016, 21 (02) : 151 - 163
  • [26] ESTIMATION OF SIMULTANEOUS EQUATION MODELS WITH MEASUREMENT ERROR
    GERACI, VJ
    ECONOMETRICA, 1977, 45 (05) : 1243 - 1255
  • [27] NONPARAMETRIC SIGNIFICANCE TESTING IN MEASUREMENT ERROR MODELS
    Dong, Hao
    Taylor, Luke
    ECONOMETRIC THEORY, 2022, 38 (03) : 454 - 496
  • [28] Learning distribution-free anchored linear structural equation models in the presence of measurement error
    Chung, Junhyoung
    Ahn, Youngmin
    Shin, Donguk
    Park, Gunwoong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN STATISTICAL SOCIETY, 2024,
  • [29] Nesting and Equivalence Testing for Structural Equation Models
    Asparouhov, Tihomir
    Muthen, Bengt
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2019, 26 (02) : 302 - 309
  • [30] Testing Structural Equation Models or Detection of Misspecifications?
    Saris, Willem E.
    Satorra, Albert
    van der Veld, William M.
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2009, 16 (04) : 561 - 582