Process Simulation Development of Fast Pyrolysis of Wood Using Aspen Plus

被引:65
|
作者
Onarheim, Kristin [1 ]
Solantausta, Yrjo [1 ]
Lehto, Jani [1 ]
机构
[1] VTT, Espoo 02044, Finland
关键词
BIOMASS FAST PYROLYSIS; BIO-OILS; FLASH PYROLYSIS; CELLULOSE; RESIDUES; LIQUID;
D O I
10.1021/ef502023y
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
A steady-state Aspen Plus simulation model has been developed that provides estimated mass and energy balances for an industrial fluidizing-bed fast pyrolysis process to produce bio-oil. The tool can be used to assess plant performance under varying process conditions using different feedstocks. A 30 MW lower heating value (LHV) bio-oil plant was modeled utilizing two different feedstock types (pine and forest residues). The fast pyrolysis product yields are functions of feedstock ash content and were calculated on the basis of data generated by a 0.5 t/d fast pyrolysis test unit. The UNIQUAC activity coefficient method was used for the calculation of the liquid phase, and the ideal-gas fugacity coefficient method was used for the vapor-phase calculations. Modeling of the condensation of fast pyrolysis vapors was also verified against experimental data gained from the 0.5 t/d test unit. Production costs were estimated for the two concepts. The results show that the pine-based fast pyrolysis process has better process efficiency and lower production costs compared with the forest-residue-based process. The total estimated capital investment costs including plant fixed capital investment (FCI), startup, working capital, and interest over construction period were estimated to be 24 and 28 M epsilon for the pine- and forest-residue-based processes, respectively. Sensitivity analyses showed that the bio-oil quality and bio-oil production efficiency can be improved by drying the recycle gas. Varying the production cost parameters within an industrially relevant range resulted in a production cost of bio-oil between 50 and 70 epsilon/MWh. However, unless the wood price is lower than current market price (20 epsilon/MWh assumed here) or excess heat may be valued higher than the fuel price, production is not currently competitive compared with fossil alternatives.
引用
收藏
页码:205 / 217
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Pyrolysis Study of Different Fruit Wastes Using an Aspen Plus Model
    AlNouss, Ahmed
    Parthasarathy, Prakash
    Mackey, Hamish R.
    Al-Ansari, Tareq
    McKay, Gordon
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS, 2021, 5
  • [42] Provisional investigation of biomass pyrolysis in CSTR using Simulink® and Aspen Plus
    Yamini, K.
    Charan, Sandeep K.
    Poddar, Sourav
    Babu, Sarat Chandra J.
    BIOMASS CONVERSION AND BIOREFINERY, 2023, 13 (17) : 15903 - 15916
  • [43] MODELING OF WOOD CHIPS GASIFICATION PROCESS IN ASPEN PLUS WITH MULTIPLE VALIDATION APPROACH
    Cekovic, Ivana
    Manic, Nebojsa
    Stojiljkovic, Dragoslava
    Trninic, Marta
    Todorovic, Dusan
    Jovovic, Aleksandar
    CHEMICAL INDUSTRY & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING QUARTERLY, 2019, 25 (03) : 217 - 228
  • [44] Process simulation of multi-stage chemical-looping combustion using Aspen Plus
    Meng, William X.
    Banerjee, Subhodeep
    Zhang, Xiao
    Agarwal, Ramesh K.
    ENERGY, 2015, 90 : 1869 - 1877
  • [45] Simulation of Membrane Gas Separation Process Using Aspen Plus (R) V8.6
    Sharifian, Seyedmehdi
    Harasek, Michael
    Haddadi, Bahram
    CHEMICAL PRODUCT AND PROCESS MODELING, 2016, 11 (01): : 67 - 72
  • [46] Simulation of reactive distillation process for esterification of terephthalic acid with ethylene glycol using Aspen Plus
    Zhao, Guosheng
    Yang, Bolun
    Yin, Xiaobo
    Shiyou Huagong/Petrochemical Technology, 2004, 33 (05):
  • [47] Process simulation of biomass entrained flow gasification based on aspen plus
    East China University of Science and Technology, Institute of Clean Coal Technology, Shanghai 200237, China
    Taiyangneng Xuebao/Acta Energiae Solaris Sinica, 2007, 28 (12): : 1360 - 1364
  • [48] Aspen Plus® Modeling and Simulation of an Industrial Biomass Direct Liquefaction Process
    Cecilio, Duarte M.
    Goncalves, J. Ricardo M.
    Correia, Maria Joana Neiva
    Mateus, Maria Margarida
    FUELS, 2023, 4 (02): : 221 - 242
  • [49] Sensitivity analysis of biomass pyrolysis for renewable fuel production using Aspen Plus
    Rosha, Pali
    Kumar, Sandeep
    Ibrahim, Hussameldin
    ENERGY, 2022, 247
  • [50] Simulation and Optimization of Chlorella vulgaris Gasification Using Aspen Plus
    Atikah, M. S. N.
    Harun, Razif
    PROCESS INTEGRATION AND OPTIMIZATION FOR SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 3 (03) : 349 - 357