Evaluation of global gravity field models using shipborne free-air gravity anomalies over the Gulf of Guinea, Central Africa

被引:7
|
作者
Gautier, Kamto Paul [1 ,2 ]
Loudi, Yap [1 ,2 ]
Alain, Zanga Amougou [3 ]
Ludovic, Kande Houetchak [1 ,2 ]
Severin, Nguiya [2 ,4 ]
Joseph, Kamguia [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Inst Cartog NIC, Res Lab Geodesy, Yaounde, Cameroon
[2] Univ Yaounde I, Dept Phys, Fac Sci, Yaounde, Cameroon
[3] Univ Douala, Dept Phys, Fac Sci, Douala, Cameroon
[4] Univ Douala, Lab E3M, Fac Ind Engn, Douala, Cameroon
关键词
Global geopotential models; Shipborne gravity anomalies; Spectral enhancement method (SEM); EGM2008; Gulf of Guinea; GRAVIMETRIC QUASIGEOID MODEL; LEAST-SQUARES COLLOCATION;
D O I
10.1080/00396265.2021.1921519
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In this work, the principal aim is to evaluate some recent GGMs on the Gulf of Guinea region using shipborne free-air gravity data. Two types of GGMs are evaluated in this study: combined models (EGM2008, EIGEN-6C4, GECO, SGG-UGM-1, GOCO05C and XGM2016) and satellite-only models (DIR_R5, ITU_GGC16, SPW_R5, TIM_R5, GGM05G and NULP_02S). The comparisons between these GGMs and the preliminary filtered shipborne gravity data were performed before and after the Spectral Enhancement Method (SEM). The statistical results have shown that the combined models have a better performance than the satellite-only models. Before and after SEM, we note that the EGM2008 model presents the best statistical results compared to the shipborne gravity anomalies (RMS and SD values respectively changes from 3.87 to 3.55 mGal and from 3.57 to 3.32 mGal). However, the DIR_R5 model is the best of the satellite-only GGMs of this study.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 253
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] PRELIMINARY FREE-AIR GRAVITY ANOMALY MAP OF GULF OF MEXICO FROM SURFACE-SHIP MEASUREMENTS
    YUNGUL, SH
    DEHLINGER, P
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, 1962, 67 (09): : 3612 - &
  • [32] Evaluation of recent Earth's global gravity field models with terrestrial gravity data
    Karpik, Alexander P.
    Kanushin, Vadim F.
    Ganagina, Irina G.
    Goldobin, Denis N.
    Kosarev, Nikolay S.
    Kosareva, Alexandra M.
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO GEOPHYSICS AND GEODESY, 2016, 46 (01): : 1 - 11
  • [33] Validation of GOCE global gravity field models using terrestrial gravity data in Norway
    Sprlak, M.
    Gerlach, C.
    Pettersen, B. R.
    JOURNAL OF GEODETIC SCIENCE, 2012, 2 (02) : 134 - 143
  • [34] DETERMINATION OF MEAN SEA-SURFACE AND FREE-AIR GRAVITY-ANOMALIES USING SATELLITE ALIMETER DATA IN THE FAEROES ISLANDS REGION
    KNUDSEN, P
    GEOEXPLORATION, 1987, 24 (03): : 258 - 258
  • [35] Global Lunar Gravity Field Using Local Mascon Models
    Mcardle, Sean
    Russell, Ryan P.
    JOURNAL OF THE ASTRONAUTICAL SCIENCES, 2024, 71 (05):
  • [36] A comparison of the gravity field over Central Europe from superconducting gravimeters, GRACE and global hydrological models, using EOF analysis
    Crossley, David
    de Linage, Caroline
    Hinderer, Jacques
    Boy, Jean-Paul
    Famiglietti, James
    GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 189 (02) : 877 - 897
  • [37] MANTLE PHASE-TRANSITIONS AND THE FREE AIR GRAVITY-ANOMALIES OVER FENNOSCANDIA AND LAURENTIA
    PELTIER, WR
    WU, P
    GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1982, 9 (07) : 731 - 734
  • [38] Evaluation of global gravity field models by using GNSS/leveling data: a case study in Vietnam
    Thi Hong Tham Bui
    Truong Thanh Phi
    The European Physical Journal Plus, 138
  • [39] Evaluation of global gravity field models by using GNSS/leveling data: a case study in Vietnam
    Bui, Thi Hong Tham
    Phi, Truong Thanh
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2023, 138 (10):
  • [40] Resolution evaluation of the satellite altimetric gravity anomaly models with shipborne gravity data over the Cosmonaut Sea, East Antarctica (44-52° E)
    Yang, Chunguo
    Qin, Linjiang
    Ding, Weifeng
    Gao, Jinyao
    Wu, Guochao
    GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2024, 72 (08) : 3090 - 3103