Investment decisions: The trade-off between economic and environmental objectives

被引:14
|
作者
Narayanan, Venkateshwaran [1 ]
Baird, Kevin [2 ]
Tay, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] RMIT Univ, Sch Accounting Informat Syst & Supply Chain, 445 Swanston St, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
[2] Macquarie Univ, Dept Accounting & Corp Governance, N Ryde, NSW 2019, Australia
来源
BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW | 2021年 / 53卷 / 03期
关键词
Managerial decision-making; Trade-offs; Investment decisions; Performance reward systems; Environmental consciousness; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; BUSINESS PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; CORPORATE; FINANCIALISATION; FINANCIALIZATION; TECHNOLOGIES; INCENTIVES; CHALLENGES; NARRATIVES;
D O I
10.1016/j.bar.2020.100969
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
While there are broader socio-political, psychological, and structural factors that influence investment decisions (see Harris et al., 2016), in line with the critical approach, this study provides an empirical insight into the notion that financialization, specifically the tendency to prioritise economic over environmental objectives, has a strong bearing on how managers view investment trade-off decisions in relation to sustainability issues. The study empirically investigates this notion by examining the investment trade-off preferences of Australian managers in relation to three decision attributes - economic outcomes (i.e. financial returns), environmental impact (i.e. carbon emissions) and stakeholder pressure to consider environmental issues. We use the discrete choice experimental method to quantify the trade-offs between the above mentioned three attributes. In addition, we also investigate the potential effect of three contingency factors on individual's preferences. Specifically, at the organisational level, we explore the effects of financial and environmental rewards and at the individual level, we explore the effect of environmental consciousness. In line with the financialization hypotheses our results indicate that managers prioritise financial returns over carbon emissions and stakeholder pressures with the preference for financial returns found to be positively associated with rewards for financial performance. However, in line with the pragmatic approach and despite the overall dominance of financial returns, there is evidence that manager's focus on financial returns can be influenced, with the preference for financial returns negatively associated with rewards for environmental performance and environmental consciousness. In addition, while stakeholder pressure was not found to be associated with any of the three contingency factors and, manager's emphasis on carbon emissions was not associated with financial rewards, manager's emphasis on carbon emissions was found to be positively associated with both rewards for environmental performance and environmental consciousness. Therefore, our findings suggest that corporate management have an important role to play, both in respect to the design of performance rewards systems and the recruitment of environmentally conscious managers, in order to promote the sustainability agenda. (c) 2020 British Accounting Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Is green and profitable sustainable? Assessing the trade-off between economic and environmental aspects
    Figge, Frank
    Hahn, Tobias
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2012, 140 (01) : 92 - 102
  • [22] The trade-off between costs and carbon emissions from economic lot-sizing decisions
    Turkensteen, Marcel
    van den Heuvel, Wilco
    INFOR, 2023, 61 (02) : 169 - 198
  • [23] No Evidence for a Trade-Off between Reproductive Investment and Immunity in a Rodent
    Xu, Yan-Chao
    Yang, Deng-Bao
    Wang, De-Hua
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (05):
  • [24] Trade-off between the economic and environmental impact of different decarbonisation strategies for residential buildings
    Conci, Mira
    Konstantinou, Thaleia
    van den Dobbelsteen, Andy
    Schneider, Jens
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 155 : 137 - 144
  • [25] CONSUMPTION-INVESTMENT TRADE-OFF, WAGE-PROFIT TRADE-OFF, AND TERMS OF TRADE
    SCHMITTRINK, G
    WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1979, 7 (10) : 955 - 960
  • [26] Environmental protection versus economic development: A false trade-off?
    Feiock, RC
    Stream, C
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2001, 61 (03) : 313 - 321
  • [27] Assess economic and environmental trade-off for inland port location
    Chang, Zheng
    Weng, Jinxian
    Qi, Zhuang
    Yang, Dong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SHIPPING AND TRANSPORT LOGISTICS, 2019, 11 (2-3) : 243 - 261
  • [28] The trade-off between economic growth and environmental quality: does economic freedom asymmetric matter for Pakistan?
    Majeed, Muhammad Tariq
    Yu, Zhiyuan
    Maqbool, Adnan
    Genie, Mesfin
    Ullah, Sana
    Ahmad, Waheed
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (31) : 41912 - 41921
  • [29] The trade-off between economic growth and environmental quality: does economic freedom asymmetric matter for Pakistan?
    Muhammad Tariq Majeed
    Zhiyuan Yu
    Adnan Maqbool
    Mesfin Genie
    Sana Ullah
    Waheed Ahmad
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 2021, 28 : 41912 - 41921
  • [30] The impact of central government environmental inspection on the trade-off between economic growth and environmental improvement in China
    Penghao Cheng
    Long Cao
    Digital Economy and Sustainable Development, 3 (1):